| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG/2013/27 |
|
Proposal to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 24 Jul 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-06 |
|
IRU observations and conclusions regarding the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear under-run protection devices. |
| Submitted by: IRU |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 18 Sep 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-20 |
|
OICA counter-proposal to the German proposal (document GRSG/2013/27) to introduce more stringent requirements for rear underrun protection devices. |
| Submitted by: OICA |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 03 Oct 13 |
| Document status: Superseded |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-23 |
|
Justification for raising the stringency of rear underrun protection device requirements as proposed in document GRSG/2013/27. |
| Submitted by: Germany |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 07 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 |
| Reference Number: GRSG-105-26 |
|
CLCCR recommendation to establish an expert group to further consider the German proposal to raise rear underrun protection device (RUPD) requirements. CLCCR raises concerns over the cost-benefit and in particular, over the relative effectiveness of higher requirements across the range of vehicle categories that would be affected. |
| Submitted by: CLCCR |
| Meeting Sessions: 105th GRSG session (8-11 Oct 2013) |
| Document date: 08 Oct 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| GRSG-105-06 | IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 | |
| GRSG-105-06 | IRU comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 | |
| GRSG-105-20 | Proposal for draft amendments to Regulation No. 58 | |
| GRSG-105-23 | Justification for more stringent RUPD requirements | |
| GRSG-105-26 | CLCCR comments on the proposal to increase the stringency of Regulation No. 58 | |
| GRSG/2013/27 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 | |
| GRSG/2013/27 | Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 58 |