Proposal based on informal document GRVA-25-43 to amend Annex 4, para. 3.5.1. to require the manufacturer to demonstrate to the Type Approval Authority at least every three years that the safety management system continues to comply with requirements for software and hardware employed in the system. This amendment applies the same principle regarding Safety Management System compliance as specified in UN Regulation No. 171 on Driver Control Assistance Systems.

Proposal to insert para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of Automated Lane Keeping Systems active in multiple Contracting Party territories to provide information on traffic rules identification, territory-specific testing, and contact details, insert paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform and consult receiving approval authorities at least 30 days before approval, allow receiving authorities 30 days to comment on regulation interpretation, require dispute resolution under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and insert footnote [Y] stating these provisions shall be kept under periodic review by GRVA for amendment as necessary.

Proposal to:

• Insert new para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of ALKS active in territories other than the approving Contracting Party to provide summaries of how applicable traffic rules were identified, interpreted, and assessed, summaries of specific testing carried out, and a single point of contact,
• Insert new paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform receiving approval authorities of such ALKS, requiring information sharing at least 30 days prior to approval, permitting receiving authorities to comment within 30 days, establishing dispute settlement under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and requiring the same procedures when extending type approval to additional territories,
• Insert footnotes [Y] and [X] regarding periodic review and contact details for approval authorities.

Proposal to clarify the provisions
applicable to the type-approval of Risk Mitigation Functions (RMF): Amend para. 5.1.6.3.4. to clarify that the signal to activate hazard warning lights is generated with the start of the intervention and is deemed to start the intervention, amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.1. to specify that hazard warning lights are activated at the earliest five seconds after the warning signal, and amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.2. (Scenarios A and B) to specify the same timing requirement for hazard warning lights activation in tests for RMF bringing the vehicle to a safe stop outside its own lane of travel. The proposal clarifies that the starting time of RMF operation comes with the driver warning and that five seconds should be measured until the hazard warning lights come.

Proposal based on informal document GRVA-25-43 to amend Annex 4, para. 3.5.1. to require the manufacturer to demonstrate to the Type Approval Authority at least every three years that the safety management system continues to comply with requirements for software and hardware employed in the system. This amendment applies the same principle regarding Safety Management System compliance as specified in UN Regulation No. 171 on Driver Control Assistance Systems.

Proposal to insert para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of Automated Lane Keeping Systems active in multiple Contracting Party territories to provide information on traffic rules identification, territory-specific testing, and contact details, insert paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform and consult receiving approval authorities at least 30 days before approval, allow receiving authorities 30 days to comment on regulation interpretation, require dispute resolution under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and insert footnote [Y] stating these provisions shall be kept under periodic review by GRVA for amendment as necessary.

Proposal to:

• Insert new para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of ALKS active in territories other than the approving Contracting Party to provide summaries of how applicable traffic rules were identified, interpreted, and assessed, summaries of specific testing carried out, and a single point of contact,
• Insert new paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform receiving approval authorities of such ALKS, requiring information sharing at least 30 days prior to approval, permitting receiving authorities to comment within 30 days, establishing dispute settlement under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and requiring the same procedures when extending type approval to additional territories,
• Insert footnotes [Y] and [X] regarding periodic review and contact details for approval authorities.

Proposal to clarify the provisions
applicable to the type-approval of Risk Mitigation Functions (RMF): Amend para. 5.1.6.3.4. to clarify that the signal to activate hazard warning lights is generated with the start of the intervention and is deemed to start the intervention, amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.1. to specify that hazard warning lights are activated at the earliest five seconds after the warning signal, and amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.2. (Scenarios A and B) to specify the same timing requirement for hazard warning lights activation in tests for RMF bringing the vehicle to a safe stop outside its own lane of travel. The proposal clarifies that the starting time of RMF operation comes with the driver warning and that five seconds should be measured until the hazard warning lights come.

Proposal based on informal document GRVA-25-43 to amend Annex 4, para. 3.5.1. to require the manufacturer to demonstrate to the Type Approval Authority at least every three years that the safety management system continues to comply with requirements for software and hardware employed in the system. This amendment applies the same principle regarding Safety Management System compliance as specified in UN Regulation No. 171 on Driver Control Assistance Systems.

Proposal to insert para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of Automated Lane Keeping Systems active in multiple Contracting Party territories to provide information on traffic rules identification, territory-specific testing, and contact details, insert paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform and consult receiving approval authorities at least 30 days before approval, allow receiving authorities 30 days to comment on regulation interpretation, require dispute resolution under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and insert footnote [Y] stating these provisions shall be kept under periodic review by GRVA for amendment as necessary.

Proposal to:

• Insert new para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of ALKS active in territories other than the approving Contracting Party to provide summaries of how applicable traffic rules were identified, interpreted, and assessed, summaries of specific testing carried out, and a single point of contact,
• Insert new paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform receiving approval authorities of such ALKS, requiring information sharing at least 30 days prior to approval, permitting receiving authorities to comment within 30 days, establishing dispute settlement under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and requiring the same procedures when extending type approval to additional territories,
• Insert footnotes [Y] and [X] regarding periodic review and contact details for approval authorities.

Proposal to clarify the provisions
applicable to the type-approval of Risk Mitigation Functions (RMF): Amend para. 5.1.6.3.4. to clarify that the signal to activate hazard warning lights is generated with the start of the intervention and is deemed to start the intervention, amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.1. to specify that hazard warning lights are activated at the earliest five seconds after the warning signal, and amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.2. (Scenarios A and B) to specify the same timing requirement for hazard warning lights activation in tests for RMF bringing the vehicle to a safe stop outside its own lane of travel. The proposal clarifies that the starting time of RMF operation comes with the driver warning and that five seconds should be measured until the hazard warning lights come.

Proposal based on informal document GRVA-25-43 to amend Annex 4, para. 3.5.1. to require the manufacturer to demonstrate to the Type Approval Authority at least every three years that the safety management system continues to comply with requirements for software and hardware employed in the system. This amendment applies the same principle regarding Safety Management System compliance as specified in UN Regulation No. 171 on Driver Control Assistance Systems.

Proposal to insert para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of Automated Lane Keeping Systems active in multiple Contracting Party territories to provide information on traffic rules identification, territory-specific testing, and contact details, insert paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform and consult receiving approval authorities at least 30 days before approval, allow receiving authorities 30 days to comment on regulation interpretation, require dispute resolution under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and insert footnote [Y] stating these provisions shall be kept under periodic review by GRVA for amendment as necessary.

Proposal to:

• Insert new para. 3.2.2. requiring manufacturers of ALKS active in territories other than the approving Contracting Party to provide summaries of how applicable traffic rules were identified, interpreted, and assessed, summaries of specific testing carried out, and a single point of contact,
• Insert new paras. 4.8. to 4.8.6. establishing procedures for granting approval authorities to inform receiving approval authorities of such ALKS, requiring information sharing at least 30 days prior to approval, permitting receiving authorities to comment within 30 days, establishing dispute settlement under Article 10 and Schedule 6 of the 1958 Agreement, and requiring the same procedures when extending type approval to additional territories,
• Insert footnotes [Y] and [X] regarding periodic review and contact details for approval authorities.

Proposal to clarify the provisions
applicable to the type-approval of Risk Mitigation Functions (RMF): Amend para. 5.1.6.3.4. to clarify that the signal to activate hazard warning lights is generated with the start of the intervention and is deemed to start the intervention, amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.1. to specify that hazard warning lights are activated at the earliest five seconds after the warning signal, and amend Annex 8 para. 3.6.2. (Scenarios A and B) to specify the same timing requirement for hazard warning lights activation in tests for RMF bringing the vehicle to a safe stop outside its own lane of travel. The proposal clarifies that the starting time of RMF operation comes with the driver warning and that five seconds should be measured until the hazard warning lights come.