Based upon a proposal (GRSP/2012/17) from OICA to include requirements for automatic door locking systems that would allow for “mixed configurations” of locked and unlocked doors in the test procedures, this text was adopted by the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) at its 52nd session. The proposals allows for automatically unlocking systems to enable exit post-crash.
| Reference Number: | WP.29/2013/48 |
| Meeting Session(s): | 160th WP.29 session (25-28 Jun 2013) |
| Document date: | 05 Apr 13 |
| Document status: | Adopted text published |
| Regarding: | UN R95 Lateral Collision Protection |
| View full document file for more information | |
Proposal as approved by the GRSP to introduce provisions for coupling systems used in charging a Rechargeable Energy Storage System (REESS).
| Reference Number: | WP.29/2013/108 |
| Meeting Session(s): | 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: | 19 Jul 13 |
| Document status: | Adopted text published |
| Regarding: | UN R95 Lateral Collision Protection |
| View full document file for more information | |
Proposal to delete Appendix 3 (examination of the mobile impact barrier) to Annex 5 of UN R95. Appendix 3 was rendered redundant by the 02 series of amendments to the regulation (which introduced the EEVC mobile deformable barrier).
| Reference Number: | WP.29/2015/50 |
| Meeting Session(s): | 166th WP.29 session (23-26 Jun 2015) |
| Document date: | 08 Apr 15 |
| Document status: | Adopted text published |
| Regarding: | UN R95 Lateral Collision Protection |
| View full document file for more information | |
Pursuant to GRPE work on vehicle propulsion system definitions (VPSD informal group; see document WP.29-165-17), this proposal would update the definition of the acronym “REESS” to refer to “rechargeable electrical energy storage system” across the passive safety regulations and currently proposed texts that make use of this acronym. (REESS had previously referred generically to “rechargeable energy storage systems”.)
| Reference Number: | WP.29/2015/97 |
| Meeting Session(s): | 167th WP.29 session (10-13 Nov 2015) |
| Document date: | 24 Aug 15 |
| Document status: | Adopted text published |
| Regarding: | UN R95 Lateral Collision Protection |
| Adoption Vote | |
| This proposal (WP.29/2015/97), Not amended, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 38 applying UN R95 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining. | |
| View full document file for more information | |
Proposal to clarify the conditions where a door is deemed to be open under UN R95. Technical Services have interpreted the definition of “open” under paragraph 5.3.1. differently, resulting in divergent outcomes. The proposed definitions are taken from UN Regulation No. 135 Revision 1. The proposal reduces the force level from 500 N to 400 N for the test to open the door.
| Reference Number: | WP.29/2018/133 |
| Meeting Session(s): | 176th WP.29 session (12-16 Nov 2018) |
| Document date: | 15 Aug 18 |
| Document status: | Adopted by WP.29 |
| Regarding: | UN R95 Lateral Collision Protection |
| Adoption Vote | |
| This proposal (WP.29/2018/133) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 41 applying UN R95 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining. | |
| View full document file for more information | |