4.7. Consideration of draft amendments to existing UN Regulations submitted by GRRF
|
88. The World Forum considered the draft amendments under agenda items 4.7.1 to 4.7.8 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting, subject to the following corrections:
|
|
|
|
|
|
89. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/8, the title, for “Supplement 1 to the 01 series”, read “Supplement 17 to the 00 series”.
|
WP.29/2018/8 | UN R13-H: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 00 series of amendments
|
UN R13-H: Proposal for Supplement 17 to the 00 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2018/8
|
|
Proposal to enable activation of the ESC optical symbol in cases of a corrective steering function intervention when the CSF intervention is activated under the control of an ESC system. The aim is to avoid separate requirements for brake-actuated and steering-actuated vehicle stability functions (VSF) that would lead to two optical warnings where only one is necessary. This would enable use of the ESC intervention tell-tale for CSF steering intervention.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 174th WP.29 session (12-16
Mar 2018)
|
|
Document date: 26 Dec 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/8), as amended by para. 89, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 49 applying UN R13-H were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
90. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/9, Annex 21, paragraph 2.1.4., second subparagraph, amend to read:
“Additionally, interventions by systems related to the vehicle stability function (including traction control, trailer stability assist, corner brake control, other similar functions that use throttle individual torque control to operate and share common components with vehicle stability function, and ESC or VSF intervention on the steering angle of one or more wheels for the purpose of vehicle stability) may also be indicated to the driver by this flashing optical warning signal.”
|
WP.29/2018/9 | UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 15 to the 11 series of amendments
|
UN R13: Proposal for Supplement 15 to the 11 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2018/9
|
|
Proposal to - delete redundant provisions (paragraphs 2.2. and 2.2.1.) in favor of paragraph 5.2.2.13. which requires all O4 trailers to be equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) of Category A.
- clarify exemptions from electronic stability control requirements, and
- enable the verification of sufficient movement of the balancer without having to take measurements underneath the trailer.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 174th WP.29 session (12-16
Mar 2018)
|
|
Document date: 28 Dec 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/9), as amended by para. 90, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R13 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
91. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/12, on page 4, for “Qp”, read “qp”.
|
WP.29/2018/12 | UN R90: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments
|
UN R90: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2018/12
|
|
Proposal to expand the scope of UN R90 to include requirements for the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies for L-category vehicles.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 174th WP.29 session (12-16
Mar 2018)
|
|
Document date: 26 Dec 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/12), as amended by para. 91, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-three Contracting Parties out of the 43 applying UN R90 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-three voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|
|
92. In ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/35, paragraphs 2.1.4., amend to read: | 12.2.2. | As from 1 September 2019, Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation shall not be obliged to accept UN type approvals to the preceding series (02) of amendments, first issued after 1 September 2019. | | 12.2.3. | Until 1 September 2021, Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation shall continue to accept UN type approvals to the preceding series (02) of amendments to the UN Regulation, first issued before 1 September 2019. | | 12.2.4. | As from 1 September 2021, Contracting Parties applying this UN Regulation shall not be obliged to accept type approval issued to the preceding series of amendments to this UN Regulation. |
93. WP.29 noted the concern raised by the representative of OICA on the selection of an early date of application for the transitional provisions in paragraphs 12.2.3. and 12.2.4., which could create serious development difficulties, due to the introduction of new requirements compared to the very recently adopted 02 series of amendments, while vehicles are currently under development for the latter.
|
WP.29/2018/35 | UN R79: Proposal for the 03 series of amendments
|
UN R79: Proposal for the 03 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2018/35
|
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for driver-initiated automated lane-change systems (Category C ASCF) and for automated emergency steering functions (ESF). This proposal includes amendments the annex on complex electronic systems (Annex 6), in particular, to require auditing of the methodologies used to ensure system safety at both concept and system level. The concept level specifically requires consideration of interaction with other vehicle systems.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 174th WP.29 session (12-16
Mar 2018)
|
|
Document date: 28 Dec 17
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2018/35), as amended by para. 92, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 43 applying UN R79 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|
|
|
|