Proposal to demonstrate compliance with the object size (paragraph 3, Annex 9) regarding the camera mounting position by calculation in order to cover variations in camera positions efficiently.

There are some vehicle configurations for which MOIS may not work correctly (e.g.: because of the vehicle body, the vehicle use). This proposal would exempt these vehicles from the MOIS requirements as long as they are not ready to drive off or during operation of incompatible auxiliary equipment if it is agreed by the Type Approval Authority.

Proposal to introduce appropriate trajectories for each type of M3 vehicle. Envelope 4 represents a specific trajectory for a Class I non-articulated (rigid) M3 vehicle. Envelope 5 represents trajectories for Class II, Class III and articulated M3 vehicles of all classes. The proposal also adds ‘Classification of power-driven vehicles and trailers’ in line with the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3.).

Proposal to replace “audible/acoustic system” with “detection system” to clarify that the type of signal mentioned in para. 1 of Annex 10 is not limited to acoustic signals and to replace “warning signal” with “information signal” to align paras. 1.3.2. and 1.4.2. of Annex 10 with the requirements of chapter 17 (detection systems).