|
The World Forum will consider the following proposals and may decide to submit them to AC.1 with recommendations on their adoption by vote.
Proposals not subject to presentation by the GRVA Chair (A-Points):
4.7.1. Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments to UN R90
4.7.2. Supplement 1 to UN R152
Proposals subject to presentation by the GRVA Chair:
4.7.3. New 01 series of amendments to UN R152
4.7.4. Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to UN R79
|
WP.29/2020/8 | UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
|
UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2020/8
|
|
Proposal to align approval numbers and markings under UN R90 with Schedule 4 of Revision 3 to the 1958 Agreement. Please note that WP.29 adopted document WP.29/2019/47 as Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments to UN R90 during its June 2019 session. Therefore, this proposal (if adopted) would be Supplement 6.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 180th WP.29 session (9-12
Mar 2020)
|
|
Document date: 20 Dec 19
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/8) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 46 applying UN R90 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29/2020/11 | UN R79: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
UN R79: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2020/11
|
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for - the approval of Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) systems
- a “two-step Human Machine Interface” in the requirements for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF) of Category C lane-change functions, and
- to resolve measurement concerns in the test requirements for ACSF of Category B1 and C by introducing provisions for tolerances, including:
- inclusion of the position at which the lateral acceleration was measured and the position of the centre of gravity of the vehicle for better traceablility,
- sampling rate of at least 100 Hz for dynamic testing,
- specification of filters and cut-off frequency for determination of lateral acceleration,
- option to measure “overriding force” torque via an internal sensor or an external device (e.g., steering robot).
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 180th WP.29 session (9-12
Mar 2020)
|
|
Document date: 06 Jan 20
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/11) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 46 applying UN R79 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29/2020/9 | UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 1
|
UN R152: Proposal for Supplement 1
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2020/9
|
|
Proposal to improve and clarify the text of the Regulation.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 180th WP.29 session (9-12
Mar 2020)
|
|
Document date: 20 Dec 19
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/9) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 56 applying UN R152 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29/2020/10 | UN R152: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
|
UN R152: Proposal for the 01 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2020/10
|
|
Proposal to introduce new and enhanced requirements for the car-to-pedestrian test scenario. These requirements would be phased in from May 2024.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 180th WP.29 session (9-12
Mar 2020)
|
|
Document date: 31 Dec 19
|
|
Document status: Adopted text published
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2020/10) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-nine Contracting Parties out of the 56 applying UN R152 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-nine voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|