| previous meeting | next meeting |
| Attendance | |||
| 1. | Adoption of the agenda |
In accordance with Chapter III, Rule 7 of the Rules of Procedure (TRANS/WP.29/690, Amend. 1 and Amend. 2) of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), the first item on the provisional agenda is the adoption of the agenda.
GRSP-64-17/Rev.1 | GRSP-64: Running order of the agenda
GRSP-64-18 | GRSP-64: Internal annotations to the agenda
|
GRSP/2018/23 | Annotated provisional agenda for the 64th GRSP session
GRSP-64-17/Rev.1 | GRSP-64: Running order of the agenda
|
| 2. | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 7 (Head restraints) |
GRSP agreed to resume discussion based on the latest results of work of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on UN Global Technical Regulation (UN GTR) No. 7, Phase 2 and its revised proposals on: (a) UN GTR Phase 2 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/27) and (b) a proposal of amendments to the Mutual Resolution No. 1 (M.R.1).
GRSP-64-40 | GTR 7: Draft 8th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
|
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
GRSP-64-39/Rev.1 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1 (Phase 2 development)
Proposal to introduce a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID). This proposal eliminates the backset measurement test procedure using the HRMD method.
GRSP-64-44 | GTR 7: Dynamic criteria for the BioRID dummy
Report on CLEPA assessments of the proposed GTR 7 Phase 2 BioRID criteria.
GRSP-64-40 | GTR 7: Draft 8th progress report of the informal group on Phase 2
GRSP-64-25 | UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
GRSP/2018/27 | GTR 7: Proposal for Amendment 1
Latest developments from the GTR 7 informal group to implement the Phase 2 development of the GTR. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
|
| 3. | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety) | ||
| 3. (a) | Proposal for Amendment 2 (Phase 2) |
The Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) may resume discussion on a possible proposal of amendments to part I of the UN GTR (statement of technical rationale and justification) to reflect the activity of the IWG on Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems (DPPS), submitted by the expert from the Republic of Korea. GRSP may also resume discussion on a proposal of amendment concerning an Addendum 3 M.R.1 to include specifications of Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (FlexPLI).
WP.29/2018/160 | GTR 9: Proposal for Amendment 2
Proposal to introduce the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) test tool, a new bumper test area definition, and related Injury Assessment Reference Values (IARVs).
|
GRSP-64-41 | Pedestrian safety in Japan
|
| 3. (b) | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 9: Proposal for Amendment 3 |
GRSP may resume consideration of Amendment 3 of the UN GTR (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2014/5) on new requirements for head form tests and the revised final report (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2012/2), pending the results of analysis from the expert of the United States of America.
GRSP/2014/5 | Proposal for amendment to draft Phase 2 to global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety)
Proposal to clarify provisions of the headform tests of UN GTR No. 9.
|
GRSP/2014/5 | Proposal for amendment to draft Phase 2 to global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety)
Proposal to clarify provisions of the headform tests of UN GTR No. 9.
GRSP-64-36 | Status Report of the Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems informal group (IWG-DPPS)
|
| 3. (c) | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 9: Proposal for Amendment 4 |
GRSP will resume consideration on a proposal of an amendment to incorporate provisions for active deployable systems in the bonnet area prepared by the IWG of Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems (IWG-DPPS).
GRSP-64-36 | Status Report of the Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems informal group (IWG-DPPS)
|
GRSP-64-36 | Status Report of the Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems informal group (IWG-DPPS)
GRSP-64-36 | Status Report of the Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems informal group (IWG-DPPS)
|
| 4. | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 13 (Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles) |
GRSP will resume discussion on Phase 2 of the UN GTR, based on the latest results of work of the IWG. |
|
| 5. | Harmonization of side impact dummies |
GRSP will continue exchanges of information about the ongoing activities of the IWG or of an advisory group of experts (pending decision of WP.29 and AC.3 at their March 2018 sessions) and on the availability of the full set of drawings and specifications, including the user manual of the 50th percentile World Side Impact dummy (WorldSID), in preparation for the final draft addendum to M.R.1. |
|
| 6. | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 20 (Electric vehicle safety) |
GRSP agreed to resume discussion on the Phase 2 of the UN GTR and on the work progress of the IWG on Electric Vehicle Safety Phase 2 (EVS PH2). |
|
| 7. | UN Regulation No. 14 (Safety-belt anchorages) |
GRSP may wish to consider a revised proposal of editorial update in Annex 1 to the UN Regulation, prepared by the expert from France. |
GRSP-64-12 | UN R14: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
GRSP-64-12 | UN R14: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to Supplement 6 to the 07 series of amendments
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
|
| 8. | UN Regulation No. 16 (Safety-belts) |
GRSP may wish to consider a proposal of corrigendum tabled by the expert from the Netherlands to clarify some text in UN Regulation No. 16 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/25). |
GRSP/2018/25 | UN R16: Proposal for a corrigendum 1 to the 07 series of amendments
Proposal to update the Communication Form since from the 07 series of amendments rear safety belt reminders have been added.
|
| 9. | UN Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seats) |
GRSP might resume consideration on a revised proposal to clarify the possibility of installing side-facing seats in buses of certain classes of vehicles. Moreover, GRSP might wish to resume consideration on a proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/34) tabled by the experts from Japan and the European Commission, proposing to align UN Regulation No. 17 to the provisions of the draft UN GTR No. 7, Phase 2.
GRSP-64-21 | UN R17: Proposal for amendments
Revised proposal (superseding GRSP-63-24) to clarify the possibility to install side-facing seats in buses of category M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>3</sub> of classes A and I.
GRSP-64-37 | UN R17: Presentation on the revision to align UN R17 with GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/34)
GRSP-64-37 | UN R17: Presentation on the revision to align UN R17 with GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/34)
|
GRSP/2018/34 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
Proposal transposing the provisions of the draft GTR 7-Amendment 1 (aka Phase 2) into UN R17. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
GRSP-64-21 | UN R17: Proposal for amendments
Revised proposal (superseding GRSP-63-24) to clarify the possibility to install side-facing seats in buses of category M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>3</sub> of classes A and I.
GRSP-64-25 | UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.
GRSP-64-37 | UN R17: Presentation on the revision to align UN R17 with GTR 7 (document GRSP/2018/34)
GRSP-64-25 | UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.
GRSP/2018/34 | UN R17: Proposal for the 10 series of amendments
Proposal transposing the provisions of the draft GTR 7-Amendment 1 (aka Phase 2) into UN R17. Phase 2 addresses a new measurement procedure for the effective height of the head restraint and introduction of the Biofidelic Rear Impact Device (BioRID).
GRSP-64-25 | UN R17: Proposal for a 10 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify the application of GTR 7 Phase 2 static alternative provisions and to modify the allowed range of tolerances under the backset retention and energy dissipations test.
|
| 10. | UN Regulation No. 22 (Protective helmets) |
GRSP may wish resume discussion on this agenda item to receive information on the progress of work of the IWG. |
|
| 11. | UN Regulation No. 29 (Cabs of commercial vehicles) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion of this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any.
GRSP-62-11 | UN R29: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a tolerance for the position of the loading device during the test. The loading device is required to be parallel to the x-y plane of the chassis. This proposal would add a z dimension to the x-y plane and set a tolerance such that the loading device may not deviate by more than 5° along the z-axis.
|
GRSP-62-11 | UN R29: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a tolerance for the position of the loading device during the test. The loading device is required to be parallel to the x-y plane of the chassis. This proposal would add a z dimension to the x-y plane and set a tolerance such that the loading device may not deviate by more than 5° along the z-axis.
|
| 12. | UN Regulation No. 44 (Child Restraint Systems) |
GRSP will consider a proposal tabled by the expert from the European Association for the Co-ordination of Consumer Representation in Standardisation on behalf of Consumers International on preventing new type approval of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/26).
GRSP-64-32 | UN R44: Phase out of belted integral CRS approvals
GRSP-64-33 | Child Restraint System Evaluation Programme (PESRI)
GRSP/2018/26 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to prohibit the granting of new approvals under UN R44 from [1 September 2020] and to amend the transitional provisions accordingly.
|
GRSP/2018/26 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to prohibit the granting of new approvals under UN R44 from [1 September 2020] and to amend the transitional provisions accordingly.
GRSP-64-32 | UN R44: Phase out of belted integral CRS approvals
GRSP-64-33 | Child Restraint System Evaluation Programme (PESRI)
GRSP-64-35/Rev.1 | UN R44: Proposal for Supplement 16 to the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to cease new CRS approvals under UN Regulation No. 44 as of [1 September 2020], including amended transitional provisions.
|
| 13. | UN Regulation No. 80 (Strength of seats and their anchorages (buses)) |
GRSP may consider a revised proposal aimed at removing the static tests and improving the dynamic test on seat anchorages.
GRSP-64-19/Add.1 | Study of the passengers’ level of protection in a frontal collision for buses equipped with the seats with lap belts and lap-shoulder belts
GRSP-64-23 | UN R80: Proposal for the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Appendix 1 by reducing the forward movement of the head of the manikin to 1.2 m in alignment with UN R14. The proposal would also limit the movement of the seat anchorages to 100 mm to ensure a minimum residual space for the passenger between the seats. Lastly, to ensure that seat fixations are reliably fastened after relocation, the proposal would require the necessary information to be marked directly on the seat and provided in the owner’s manual.
|
GRSP-64-19 | UN R80: Proposal for amendments to document GRSP/2018/10
Proposal to add injury criteria in relation to the neck bending moment along the lateral axis (not to exceed 57 Nm when stretched), clarify the distance between the seats to align with IN R107, and annulation of the proposal to delete paragraph 2.1.2 because the scope of UN R80 provides for testing of seats for vehicles of M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>3</sub> categories of II, III and B classes where approval is allowed via testing without a vehicle and mounted rigidly on a test platform.
GRSP-64-19/Add.1 | Study of the passengers’ level of protection in a frontal collision for buses equipped with the seats with lap belts and lap-shoulder belts
GRSP-64-22 | UN R80: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to delete Appendix 5 as a basis for type approval and thereby end static testing as a compliance option.
GRSP-64-23 | UN R80: Proposal for the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to amend Appendix 1 by reducing the forward movement of the head of the manikin to 1.2 m in alignment with UN R14. The proposal would also limit the movement of the seat anchorages to 100 mm to ensure a minimum residual space for the passenger between the seats. Lastly, to ensure that seat fixations are reliably fastened after relocation, the proposal would require the necessary information to be marked directly on the seat and provided in the owner’s manual.
|
| 14. | UN Regulation No. 94 (Frontal collision) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion of this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. GRSP may wish to continue discussion of this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
|
| 15. | UN Regulation No. 95 (Lateral collision) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion of this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
|
| 16. | UN Regulation No. 100 (Electric power trained vehicles) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion of this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any.
GRSP-64-24 | UN R100: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to explicitly state that functional safety requirements apply to categories of vehicles beyond M<sub>1</sub>.
GRSP-64-24 | UN R100: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to explicitly state that functional safety requirements apply to categories of vehicles beyond M<sub>1</sub>.
|
GRSP-64-24 | UN R100: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to explicitly state that functional safety requirements apply to categories of vehicles beyond M<sub>1</sub>.
|
| 17. | UN Regulation No. 111 (Uniform provisions concerning the approval of tank vehicles of categories N and O with regard to rollover stability) | ||
| 18. | UN Regulation No. 127 (Pedestrian safety) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion of this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
GRSP-64-20 | UN R127: Proposal for collective amendments to 00, 01 and 02 series of amendments
Proposal to address new active suspension technologies that can raise the height of the vehicle in motion up to a defined speed. Since the vehicle height has an influence on the headform test area (WAD) and on the test results for legform tests, all possible vehicle heights up to a driving speed of 11.1 m/s (40 km/h) should be considered to be relevant for the impact with a pedestrian. The proposal is a clarification on this issue.To ensure that such an active suspension system is considered for type approval, there should be a detailed description in the information document. Due to the fact that extensions for an existing vehicle type concerning UN Regulation No. 127 are still possible according to 00 and 01 series of amendments, the proposal is relevant for all series of amendments of the UN R127.
GRSP-64-41 | Pedestrian safety in Japan
|
| 19. | UN Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems) |
GRSP agreed to resume consideration on a proposal tabled by the expert from the Netherlands (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/33) to introduce provisions concerning “inserts” of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS). Moreover, GRSP might wish to consider six proposals tabled by the expert from the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA): (i) clarifying the definition of an “infant carrier” and to amend the transitional provisions (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/24), (ii) to clarify certain information to users (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/28), (iii) to introduce provisions concerning ECRS booster cushion category (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/29), (iv) to clarify the provisions required for booster seats in the 02 series of amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/30), (v) to introduce the definition of the “door panel geometry” (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/31) and (vi) to clarify the provisions required for booster seats in the 03 series of amendments to the UN Regulation (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2018/32).
GRSP-64-01 | UN R129: Proposal for draft Corrigendum 3 (Russian text only)
English wording “Upper neck tension force” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Сжимающая сила верхней части шеи”. English wording “Upper neck flexion moment” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Изгибающий момент верхней части шеи”.
GRSP-64-05/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP-64-08/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions. The current layout of the module label in UN R129.02 is technically impossible because the example provides a rectangular shape, with the module and base placed next to each other and joined with a plus mark while the given symbols are on top of each other and joined with an arrow mark.
GRSP-64-11 | UN R129: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 03 Series of amendments
Proposal to align the French version with the adopted English version of the text (reference document WP.29/2018/45).
GRSP-64-15 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal of corrections to document GRSP/2018/29 (previously submitted by CLEPA) regarding the introduction of booster-cushion provisions into UN R129.
GRSP-64-27 | UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/32
Proposal to clarify the use of the i-Size logo on i-Size boosters.
GRSP-64-28 | UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/28
Labels under UN R129, paragraph 4.5. highlight that the ECRS should not be used by children under 15 months old. This proposal presents the same layout for rearward/forward-facing and for forward-only CRS.
GRSP-64-28 | UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/28
Labels under UN R129, paragraph 4.5. highlight that the ECRS should not be used by children under 15 months old. This proposal presents the same layout for rearward/forward-facing and for forward-only CRS.
GRSP-64-29 | Child Restraint Document Summary: GRSP-64
GRSP-64-29 | Child Restraint Document Summary: GRSP-64
GRSP-64-30/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to specify that, in the case of an infant carrier, the dummy shall be restrained in the Enhanced Child Restraint System before it is installed on the test bench.
GRSP-64-31 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to specify the dimensions of the approval number, correct term from " Regulation No. 129-02" to "UN Regulation No. 129/02", and change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to the 150 cm stature as this is the upper limit.
GRSP-64-42 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval. This proposal supersedes the proposal to require testing of Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the door panel geometry of the 00 series of UN R129 (document GRSP/2018/31).
GRSP-64-42 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval. This proposal supersedes the proposal to require testing of Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the door panel geometry of the 00 series of UN R129 (document GRSP/2018/31).
GRSP-64-43 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions for the booster cushion category of child restraint systems under UN R129.
GRSP/2018/28 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments, Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS.
GRSP/2018/29 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of the booster cushion category of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP/2018/30 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP/2018/32 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
|
GRSP/2018/24 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to remove references to age limits in preference for limits based on stature in the definition of "infant carrier", to update the transitional provisions in line with the new guidelines on regulatory procedures (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2), especially concerning extensions of approvals, and to replace a reference in para. 16.11 to "vehicle approval" with "Enhanced Child Restraint Systems".
GRSP/2018/28 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments, Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments, Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce new and modified labeling and to clarify packaging information to distinguish between forward-facing-only, rear-facing-only, and convertible CRS in order to reduce the risk of users misusing these enhanced CRS.
GRSP/2018/29 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of the booster cushion category of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP/2018/30 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP/2018/31 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
The 01 series of amendments to UN R129 amended the door panel geometry to create a small opening close to the seat bight. This change protected the panel from interaction with the anchorage of the adult seat belt on the test bench (added subsequently in the 02 series). Although Integral ISOFIX Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) do not use the belt, these CRS were also required to use this new door panel geometry. This proposal amends the 02 series of amendments to require Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the original door panel geometry with no opening (except during extensions of approvals in which the new panel geometry was used). The proposal ensures that ISOFIX ECRS designs cannot use the opening to mitigate loads to the ECRS and dummy.
GRSP/2018/32 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP/2018/33 | UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a definition for "insert" and provisions for their use.
GRSP-64-01 | UN R129: Proposal for draft Corrigendum 3 (Russian text only)
English wording “Upper neck tension force” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Сжимающая сила верхней части шеи”. English wording “Upper neck flexion moment” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Изгибающий момент верхней части шеи”.
GRSP-64-02/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP-64-03/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 6 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP-64-04/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP-64-05/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP-64-06 | UN R129: D-E Plane Assessment Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/19 to 22
Explanatory notes related to formal documents GRSP/2018/ 19 through 22 (superseded by informal documents GRSP-64-02 to GRSP-64-05) submitted by Spain for the 63rd GRSP session.
GRSP-64-07 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to modify the approval markings:<ul><li>specify the dimensions of the approval number</li><li>update i-Size universal ISOFIX, Specific Vehicle ISOFIX, i-Size Booster seat and Specific Vehicle Booster seat numbering (omitted in WP29-2018-045)</li><li>rearrange the dimensions mark for arrangements of the approval mark where used in combination with the module mark</li><li>change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to 150 cm stature as this is the correct upper limit.</li></ul>
GRSP-64-08/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions. The current layout of the module label in UN R129.02 is technically impossible because the example provides a rectangular shape, with the module and base placed next to each other and joined with a plus mark while the given symbols are on top of each other and joined with an arrow mark.
GRSP-64-09 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to modify the approval markings for consistency between technical services and approval authorities and between the labels of products approved under the 02 and 03 series. Combinations of approval marks can be made as long as the categories are able to be combined (category-wise as given in paragraph 3.2.2 and as long as it is one approval number). By combining approval marks, space on the Enhanced Child Restraint can be saved and more space is available for clear installation and use instructions.
GRSP-64-10 | UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
Explanation of informal documents GRSP-64-07 to -09 regarding the rearrangement of approval markings.
GRSP-64-11 | UN R129: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 03 Series of amendments
Proposal to align the French version with the adopted English version of the text (reference document WP.29/2018/45).
GRSP-64-15 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal of corrections to document GRSP/2018/29 (previously submitted by CLEPA) regarding the introduction of booster-cushion provisions into UN R129.
GRSP-64-16/Rev.1 | UN R129: Presentation on the Introduction of Booster Cushions (04 series)
GRSP-64-27 | UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/32
Proposal to clarify the use of the i-Size logo on i-Size boosters.
GRSP-64-28 | UN R129: Proposal of amendments to GRSP/2018/28
Labels under UN R129, paragraph 4.5. highlight that the ECRS should not be used by children under 15 months old. This proposal presents the same layout for rearward/forward-facing and for forward-only CRS.
GRSP-64-29 | Child Restraint Document Summary: GRSP-64
GRSP-64-30/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to specify that, in the case of an infant carrier, the dummy shall be restrained in the Enhanced Child Restraint System before it is installed on the test bench.
GRSP-64-31 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to specify the dimensions of the approval number, correct term from " Regulation No. 129-02" to "UN Regulation No. 129/02", and change the 145 cm stature of the Specific Vehicle Booster seat to the 150 cm stature as this is the upper limit.
GRSP-64-34 | UN R129: Proposal for a Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to specify usage requirements for unfixed CRS inserts.
GRSP-64-42 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval. This proposal supersedes the proposal to require testing of Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the door panel geometry of the 00 series of UN R129 (document GRSP/2018/31).
GRSP-64-43 | UN R129: Proposal for the 04 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions for the booster cushion category of child restraint systems under UN R129.
GRSP-64-02/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP-64-02/Rev.1 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 9 to the 00 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that assessment of the DE plane only applies to rearward-facing Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in UN Regulation No. 44 and therefore does not apply to forward-facing child restraints that maintain structure of the child restraint behind the head of the dummy.
GRSP/2018/32 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP-64-10 | UN R129: Explanatory notes on the proposals to update approval mark arrangements
Explanation of informal documents GRSP-64-07 to -09 regarding the rearrangement of approval markings.
GRSP-64-16/Rev.1 | UN R129: Presentation on the Introduction of Booster Cushions (04 series)
GRSP-64-01 | UN R129: Proposal for draft Corrigendum 3 (Russian text only)
English wording “Upper neck tension force” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Сжимающая сила верхней части шеи”. English wording “Upper neck flexion moment” corresponds to the following Russian wording “Изгибающий момент верхней части шеи”.
GRSP/2018/24 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to remove references to age limits in preference for limits based on stature in the definition of "infant carrier", to update the transitional provisions in line with the new guidelines on regulatory procedures (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2), especially concerning extensions of approvals, and to replace a reference in para. 16.11 to "vehicle approval" with "Enhanced Child Restraint Systems".
GRSP-64-42 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify that Conformity of Production assessments shall be conducted under the same requirements as those of the original approval or, if applicable, the extension of the approval. This proposal supersedes the proposal to require testing of Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the door panel geometry of the 00 series of UN R129 (document GRSP/2018/31).
GRSP/2018/32 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify provisions for booster seats under the 02 series of amendments to avoid possible confusion with the provisions for booster cushions in the proposal for the 04 series of amendments (see document GRSP/2018/29). The proposal also adds a missing reference to Appendix 5 of UN R16 that defines envelopes for non-integral Enhanced Child Restraint Systems.
GRSP/2018/31 | UN R129: Proposal for Supplement 5 to the 02 series of amendments and Supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments
The 01 series of amendments to UN R129 amended the door panel geometry to create a small opening close to the seat bight. This change protected the panel from interaction with the anchorage of the adult seat belt on the test bench (added subsequently in the 02 series). Although Integral ISOFIX Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) do not use the belt, these CRS were also required to use this new door panel geometry. This proposal amends the 02 series of amendments to require Integral ISOFIX ECRS to use the original door panel geometry with no opening (except during extensions of approvals in which the new panel geometry was used). The proposal ensures that ISOFIX ECRS designs cannot use the opening to mitigate loads to the ECRS and dummy.
|
| 20. | UN Regulation No. 134 (Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Vehicles (HFCV)) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion on this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
|
| 21. | UN Regulation No. 135 (Pole Side Impact (PSI)) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion on this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
GRSP-64-14 | UN R135: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 00 and 01 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce objective criteria for evaluating whether a door remains latched following the pole impact test. Under UN R135, rear doors on the impacted side of the vehicle not directly struck by the pole may nonetheless be subjected to heavy loads and therefore need to be assessed. This proposal corresponds to a similar clarification already introduced into UN R95 on side impacts.
|
| 22. | UN Regulation No. 136 (Electric Vehicles of category L (EV-L)) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion on this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
|
| 23. | UN Regulation No. 137 (Frontal impact with focus on restraint systems) |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion on this agenda item on the basis of new proposals, if any. |
|
| 24. | UN Regulation No. 145 (ISOFIX anchorage systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions) |
GRSP will resume discussion of a revised proposal tabled by the expert from France to include editorial update on communication annex of UN Regulation No. 145. |
GRSP-64-13/Rev.1 | UN R145: Proposal for Corrigendum 1 to 00 series of amendments
Proposal to update a reference regarding ISOFIX exemptions permitted under paragraph 5.3.8.8. (related to vehicles with one seat position per row). The reference should read 5.3.8.8. and 5.3.8.9.
|
| 25. | Mutual Resolution No. 1 |
GRSP will resume discussion of proposals to include dummy specifications and drawings (e.g.: Q dummies) into M.R.1. |
|
| 26. | Securing of children in buses and coaches |
GRSP will resume discussion on how to secure children in buses, on the basis of an exchange of research data and statistical analysis, to be provided by the experts of contracting parties (e.g.: France, Sweden and United States of America). |
|
| 27. | Exchange of views on Vehicle Automation |
GRSP may wish to be informed about the outcome of the recent sessions of WP.29 on vehicle automation activities (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1139, paras. 22-42).
GRSP-64-45 | Highlights of the first GRVA session
|
GRSP-64-45 | Highlights of the first GRVA session
|
| 28. | The strategy of the Inland Transport Committee |
GRSP may wish to be informed about the outcome of the future strategy of the Inland Transport Committee. |
|
| 29. | Election of Officers |
In compliance with Rule 37 of the Rules of Procedure (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/690/Rev.1), GRSP will elect the Chair and Vice-Chair of the sessions scheduled for the year 2019. |
|
| 30. | Other business |
GRSP-64-41 | Pedestrian safety in Japan
|
|
| 30. (a) | Exchange of information on national and international requirements on passive safety |
GRSP may wish to exchange information.
GRSP-64-26 | New Legislation for Systems to Prevent Small Children from Being Left Unattended in Vehicles
Presentation on Italy's National Law No.117 of 1 October 2018 which makes the use systems to prevent children from being left unattended in vehicles mandatory from 1 July 2019 for M<sub>1</sub>, N<sub>1</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.
GRSP-64-41 | Pedestrian safety in Japan
|
GRSP-64-26 | New Legislation for Systems to Prevent Small Children from Being Left Unattended in Vehicles
Presentation on Italy's National Law No.117 of 1 October 2018 which makes the use systems to prevent children from being left unattended in vehicles mandatory from 1 July 2019 for M<sub>1</sub>, N<sub>1</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.
GRSP-64-41 | Pedestrian safety in Japan
|
| 30. (b) | Definitions and acronyms in Regulations under GRSP responsibilities |
GRSP may wish to continue discussion on this agenda item, and update the definitions and acronyms. |
|
| 30. (c) | Development of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) system and involvement of the Working Parties |
GRSP may wish to be informed by the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) Ambassador about the outcome of the recent meetings of the IWG on IWVTA and the follow-up of the horizontal issue on the new provisions on the numbering of UN type approvals in accordance with Schedule 4 and the existing format of the communication form affecting all UN Regulations annexed to the 1958 Agreement. |
|
| 30. (d) | Highlights of the June and November 2018 sessions of WP.29 |
GRSP will be briefed by the secretariat about the highlights of the June and November 2018 sessions of WP.29, on GRSP and common issues. |
|
| 30. (e) | Three-dimensional H-point machine |
GRSP may wish to consider the draft terms of references and the work progress of the IWG to harmonize provisions on the three-dimensional H-point machine. |
|
| 30. (f) | Intelligent transport systems |
GRSP may resume discussion on this agenda item. |