The document establishes procedures for demonstrating equivalence between vehicle circuit and indoor drum test facilities. It defines requirements for selecting exercise tyres and participating facilities, establishing baseline values from multiple facilities, and comparing facility results against baselines. For indoor drum facilities, transfer functions mathematically relate drum results to vehicle results, either as generic (fixed coefficient) or specific (facility-determined coefficient). Facilities must meet statistical criteria including result deviation limits and root mean square deviation thresholds to demonstrate equivalence.

The 47th session of the Task Force on Tyre Abrasion convened on 2 April 2026. The review committee prepared final consolidation of a new UN Regulation on Tyre Abrasion for WP.29. TFTA reviewed the workplan including data assessment, tyre batch use, and equivalence assessment governance. For C2, ETRTO presented findings on the vehicle test method at 10,000 km, while JASIC reported on indoor drum test development. Discussion on C3 Heavy-Duty Vehicle tyre applications was deferred. The next session is scheduled for 11 May 2026.

The agenda includes discussion of status of the work plan 2026 including the ITTAC proposal on tyre abrasion Convoy Method -Dual-Normalisation Framework (TA-45-08/Rev.1) and UTAC Tyre abrasion timeline Gantt (TA-46-03/Rev.1), development of the C1 tyre mileage potential metric and tread depth measurement prescription, and test method development status under C2 and C3.

ETRTO proposed three ways to estimate service life (TA-36-04): tread depth measurements, initial tread depth and abrasion index, and tread mass. JRC presented a service life index (TA-32-04) based on tread depth measurements and conducted a preliminary assessment of the second concept. Service life is estimated by linear extrapolation to 1.6 mm from tread measurements at test start and end. The Service life index is calculated as the ratio of candidate to reference tyre service life. Next steps include confirming the equation for service life via tyre characteristics and clarifying which tyre characteristics are needed.

Existing C1 tyre-abrasion test methods cannot be directly applied to C3 tyres because vehicles equipped with C3 tyres are used differently. Japan is developing a vehicle test method using WHVC mode and plans to develop a drum test method based on test conditions and results. Test conditions will convert vehicle driving conditions representing the world into indoor drum test settings. C2 test method uses driving mode based on WLTP with fixed test load details, with verification tests using reference tyres. For C3, driving modes and test conditions are under preliminary investigation, with verification tests to be planned.

The document presents a European heavy-duty vehicle and tyre market overview and C3 test method development status. The C3 tyre market is complex and diversified, with applications including long haul, regional, on/off road, winter, and urban use. A test concept has been developed focusing on road usage with 22.5" tyres, using convoys of up to four vehicles with defined acceleration standards, road distribution of 60% motorway and 40% regional roads, and tests per axle comparing candidate tyres to reference tyres. Current activities include assessment of reference tyres strategy, temperature sensitivity evaluation, and confirmation of test parameters for heavy trucks in N₃/O₃ configuration, with tests reaching 30,000 to 45,000 kilometres.

TA-48-02 updates TA-47-02. C2 tyre abrasion rate index vehicle method uses a convoy of up to 4 vehicles with single tyres, GVW up to 3.5T, FWD, loaded 60%–74% of tyre nominal load with 50/50 front/rear distribution. Test distance is 10000 km at 80% nominal pressure. Reference tyres use 2 sets of test runs with C2 candidate SRTT and existing C1 SRTTs. 2025 testing in 235/65R16C and 205/65R16C sizes showed C2 tyres sensitivity to temperature similar to C1 tyres. 2026 plan repeats and extends 2025 testing to confirm reference tyres strategy, assess temperature sensitivity and pressure impact, and define validation plan.