Show admin view
UN R51: China is finding common solutions for M1 and N1 sub-categories
Document GRB-57-05
28 January 2013

Presentation aimed at resolving differences in vehicle categorizations used around the world.

Submitted by CATARC
Download document
Previous Documents, Discussions, and Outcomes
3. (b) | New limit values

7. GRB resumed consideration on vehicle categories and their limit values on the basis of an existing database in China, Japan and EC. The expert from Japan introduced again GRB-56-05 and then GRB-57-22 explaining that according to the monitoring database in his country, the best fitting threshold for vehicle categories N2 and M3particularly should be 135 kW of power mass ratio (PMR). He continued that this value would encompass properly downsized vehicles that have a high impact on noise emissions from the vehicle fleets in Asian countries. He urged finding a compromise on vehicle categories and the adoption of a concrete proposal of the 03 series of amendments to the UN Regulation (i.e. ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2012/7). He stated that the introduction of additional sound emission provisions (ASEP) was much awaited in Japan. The expert from China gave two presentations (GRB-57-05 and GRB-57-06), to introduce possible compromise solutions (GRB-57-07) focusing on design characteristics as well as on PMR. The expert from OICA expressed appreciation for the efforts made by the expert from China to find convergence on the vehicle classification and introduced a possible compromise solution (GRB-57-19). The expert from Germany recalled that GRB started discussion with the agreement of developing a proposal for amendments focused on performance criteria rather than on design requirements. Moreover, he added that the allowance of 1 dBA for vehicles with direct injection diesel engines no longer justified. Finally, he recommended simplifying classes and subclasses, to avoid cumbersome vehicle classification thresholds that could hamper technical progress.

Relates to UN R51 |