GRE/2026/14
UN R150: Proposal for a Supplement to the 01 series of amendments
Source(s)
GTB
Date
10 Feb 2026
Status
Formal GR review
Subject
Impact
01 series of amendments | Supplement 3
Meeting(s)

Proposal to amend UN R150-01 addressing three main issues. First, since the GRE-adopted proposal to delete the unique identifier (GRE-92-18) was not part of the March 2026 WP.29 submission, the regulation text requires amendment in the interim, though this may become unnecessary if merged with GRE-92-18. Second, the approval marking approach is aligned with UN R148 by including one example in the body text and referencing other arrangements in Annex 10, allowing deletion of the Table 1 reference and redundant ratio explanations from Figure A10-I. Third, the outdated requirement for function symbols to be placed diametrically opposite the approval number — inherited from UN R3 and R7 but already removed in UN R148 — is deleted from Annex 10, along with a clarifying amendment to the note below Figure A10-I to prevent inconsistent interpretations among technical services. Further details can be found in informal document GRE-94-11.

UNECE server
Excerpts from session reports
GRE | Session 93 | 21-23 Oct 2025

9. GRE recalled the package of amendment proposals to UN Regulations Nos. 148, 149 and 150 that had been submitted by the expert from Netherlands (Kingdom of the) with the aim to take onboard the recent amendments to Schedule 5 of the 1958 Agreement on the Unique Identifier (UI) (GRE-92-13, GRE-92-14, GRE-92-15, GRE-92-16, GRE-92-17, GRE-92-18). GRE adopted these proposals and decided to merge them with other possible amendment proposals to the same series of amendments before submitting to WP.29.

GRE | Session 92 | 22-25 Apr 2025

11. The expert from the Netherlands (Kingdom of) recalled the recent amendments to Schedule 5 of the 1958 Agreement on the Unique Identifier (UI) and presented a package of amendment proposals to UN Regulations Nos. 148, 149 and 150 (GRE-92-13, GRE-92-14, GRE-92-15, GRE-92-16, GRE-92-17, GRE-92-18). Some experts requested more time to study these proposals. GRE noted that the proposals were not urgent and could be combined with other amendments to the same UN Regulations in the future. Finally, GRE decided to revert to these proposals at the next session. In the interim, GRE invited experts to send their comments to the expert from the Netherlands (Kingdom of).