Regarding: |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal for amendments to the proposal for 02 series of amendments |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-08 |
Description: Proposal by the experts from the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for heavy duty vehicles in order to supplement the proposal of document GRVA/2022/7 |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 18 Jan 22 (Posted 18 Jan 22) |
Document status: Superseded |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2022/7 |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-41 |
Submitted by: Germany |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
Document status: Superseded |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal for amendments to the 02 series of amendments |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-42/Rev.1 |
Submitted by: Germany |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
Document status: Superseded |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: Views on two-step approach to UN R131 revisions |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-44 |
Submitted by: Germany |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-12-41 |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-46 |
Submitted by: Japan |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
Document status: Superseded |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2022/7 |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-47 |
Description: Proposal concerning deactivation of AEBS related to use of front-mounted devices (e.g., snow plow). |
Submitted by: Australia |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
Document status: Withdrawn |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2022/7 |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-49 |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
Document status: Superseded |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal to amend document GRVA/2022/7 |
Document Reference Number: GRVA-12-49 |
Meeting Session: 12th GRVA session (24-28 Jan) |
Document date: 27 Jan 22 (Posted 27 Jan 22) |
Document status: Superseded |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports |
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 12 | 24-28
Jan
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art. 69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems. 70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring. 71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS. 72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions. |
Document Title: UN R131: Proposal for the 02 series of amendments |
Document Reference Number: WP.29/2022/76 |
Description: Proposal from GRVA to adapt the performance requirements in UN R131 to the current state of the art. |
Meeting Session: 187th WP.29 session (20-24 Jun) |
Document date: 11 Apr 22 (Posted 11 Apr 22) |
Document status: Formal WP.29 review |
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 131 | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
68. GRVA received a report (GRVA-12-09/Rev.1) from the expert from Germany, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS for heavy duty vehicles, on the progress made by the group to upgrade UN Regulation No. 131. He presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 (amended by GRVA-12-08), proposing to adjust the performance requirements in UN Regulation No. 131 to the current state of the art.
69. The expert from the Czech Republic highlighted that the upgraded provisions would be a significant contribution to road safety. He denied that the provisions corresponded to the current state of art technology. He explained that this assessment would only be true for a limited number of truck manufacturers and added that smaller truck manufacturers would be impacted as they were not working closely enough with the big systems suppliers for such systems.
70. The expert from ETSC mentioned the potential positive impact on road safety that this amendment, if adopted, could bring.
71. GRVA worked during the week on different options to introduce the requirements related to the vehicle to vehicle and the vehicle to pedestrian use cases and the corresponding transitional provisions as well as the AEBS deactivation conditions, on the basis of positions expressed by Australia, Germany, Japan, CLEPA, ETSC and OICA (GRVA-12-38, GRVA-12-39, GRVA-12-41, GRVA-12-42/Rev.1, GRVA-12-44, GRVA-12-46 and GRVA-12-47). GRVA also discussed provisions restricting the ability to switch off AEBS.
72. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/7 as amended by GRVA-12-49 (reproduced in GRVA-12-50/Rev.1), to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2022 sessions.