GAR | GRVA-09-17

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 131 \| Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Document:	Revision 1 \| Amendment 3
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 24 Sep 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2023/11 Proposal to increase the potential speed reduction during the collision warning phase and clarify the interpretation of “engine start/run cycle”.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 131 \| Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Document:	Revision 2 \| Amendment 1
Corresponds to:	02 series of amendments \| Supplement 1 (Entered into force on 24 Sep 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2023/12 Proposal to align provisions with corresponding provisions of UN R152 and to clarify the interpretation of the provisions on system robustness when applied to heavy duty vehicles.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 137 \| Restraint System in Frontal Impact
Document:	Revision 2
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 1 (Entered into force on 29 Dec 2018)
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 2 (Entered into force on 28 May 2019)
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 3 Jan 2021)
Corresponds to:	02 series of amendments (Entered into force on 9 Jun 2021)

UN R152: Proposal to amend the Peak Braking Coefficient reference

Document GRVA-09-17

29 January 2021

9th GRVA session (1-5 Feb 2021)

Argument for revising the PBC values used in the regulation based on technological progress in tyres and impact on road-friction parameters.

Submitted by CLEPA and OICA

9th GRVA session (1-5 Feb 2021)

7. | Advanced Emergency Braking Systems

89. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-09-18 and mentioned GRVA-09-17 explaining an issue related to the PBC reference in UN Regulation No. 152. She explained that deceleration of nine m/s² were the basis for calculation of performance criteria and that therefore a PBC value of 0.9 was not sufficient. She mentioned a revised proposal contained in GRVA-09-18/Rev.1 (document not available) to be discussed until the next session of GRVA.

90. The expert from Germany supported the proposed way forward. The expert from Canada raised a study reservation. The experts from Korea and the European Commission supported the OICA proposal.

91. GRVA agreed to resume consideration of this item at its next session.

Reference Number:	SIGTP-04-07
Meeting Session(s):	4th SIGTP session (4 Jul)
Document date:	04 Jul 24
Regarding:	UN R100 Electric Powertrain Vehicles \| GTR No. 20 Electric Vehicle Safety

Reference Number:	SIGTP-04-05/Rev.1
Submitted by:	EC
Meeting Session(s):	4th SIGTP session (4 Jul)
Document date:	04 Jul 24
Regarding:	UN R100 Electric Powertrain Vehicles

Reference Number:	SIGTP-04-02/Rev.3
Meeting Session(s):	4th SIGTP session (4 Jul)
Document date:	04 Jul 24
Regarding:	UN R100 Electric Powertrain Vehicles \| GTR No. 20 Electric Vehicle Safety

Reference Number:	SIGTP-04-03/Rev.4
Meeting Session(s):	4th SIGTP session (4 Jul)
Document date:	04 Jul 24
Regarding:	UN R134 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety \| GTR No. 20 Electric Vehicle Safety

How Do You Want Call Up the List of Documents?

AC.3 Select Year

GRB Select Year

GRBP Select Year

GRE Select Year

GRPE Select Year

GRRF Select Year

GRSG Select Year

GRSP Select Year

GRVA Select Year

WP.29 Select Year

Documents concerning UN R152 Light Vehicle AEBS

AC.3

Select Year

GRB

Select Year

GRBP

Select Year

GRE

Select Year

GRPE

Select Year

GRRF

Select Year

GRSG

Select Year

GRSP

Select Year

GRVA

Select Year

WP.29

Select Year