1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Document Title ALKS: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA-06-02
Reference Number GRVA-06-16
Date
3 Mar 2020
Summary Proposals to clarify provisions for collision avoidance in a cut-in scenario, collision avoidance with regard to crossing pedestrians, on “other activities than driving”, and on "permanent visibility" of the means for the driver to activate and deactivate the system.
Source(s) CLEPA and OICA
Rulemaking Area(s) UN R157 Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Proposal Status Informal GR review
Meeting(s)
Related Documents
GRVA-06-02 ALKS: Updated proposal for a new UN Regulation on Automated Lane Keeping Function (superseded)
Downloads
UNECE server .pdf format .docx format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
GRVA | Session 6 | 3-4 Mar 2020

7. GRVA reviewed in detail GRVA-06-02 prepared by the ACSF group for consideration at this session.

8. GRVA reviewed the scope of the proposed Regulation, discussed a number of items such as the alignment of definitions with existing standards, whether or not the Software Indentification Number (RxSWIN) mechanism in the draft UN Regulation on Software Updates and Software Update Management Systems should be implemented on a mandatory basis.

13. The Secretary produced upon request of GRVA a consolidated version of the draft UN Regulation on ALKS based on the input received during the session (GRVA-06-02-Rev.1). The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-06-16 with amendment proposal to the revision 1. After each half day session, the Secretary produced revised consolidation reflecting the current state of the discussions. GRVA adopted GRVA-06-02-Rev.4 and requested the secretariat to submit it (without square brackets) as a draft new UN Regulation on ALKS to WP.29 and the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC.1) for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions. GRVA decided that the collection of data to determine the competent and careful driver model as per Appendix 3 to Annex 4 shall be performed in order to gather information and allow Type Approval Authorities to provide feedback to the IWG on VMAD.

24. The Chair regretted that GRVA did not have enough time for reviewing the proposal submitted by the expert from AVERE and also for the proposal submitted by the expert from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. GRVA agreed to consider these two items at its September 2020 session.