GAR | GRRF/2017/9

1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
Document Title	Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 106
Reference Number	GRRF/2017/9
Date	11 Nov 2016
Summary	Proposal to: Align definitions and contents of paragraphs with the other tyre regulations (UN R30, R54, R117, etc.); Include a definition of "Manufacturer" extracted from the resolution "R.E.3"; Adopt a common definition and use of the terms "Manufacturer’s name"," Brand name", "Trademark", "Trade description" and "Commercial name" and their links; Clarify which markings shall be moulded on both sidewalls of the tyre; and those which shall be moulded on one sidewall only; Add information in the certificate to clarify the relationship with the certified products; Align definitions with Regulation EU 167/2013 which defines vehicles in category S as "interchangeable towed equipment" and includes tread patterns for ‘implement traction tyres’ that consist of blocks rather than lugs or cleats; Eliminate redundant marking requirements with the requirement for "@kPa" markings effective from 1 September 2017; Clarify the inflation pressure to be used for measurements and tests and related tyre markings; Align the current rules for calculating the dimensional limits in accordance with ISO, all major tyre standards, and as proposed for UN R30, R54, and R75;
Source(s)	ETRTO
Rulemaking Area(s)	UN R106 Agricultural Tires
Proposal Status	Superseded
Meeting(s)	GRRF \| Session 83 \| 23-27 Jan 2017 7. (e) Tyres: Regulation No. 106
Related Documents
	GRRF/2016/38		Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 106 (superseded)
	GRRF-83-14		Proposal for amendments to document GRRF/2017/9 (superseded)
	GRRF-83-23		Amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/9 (superseded)
Downloads
UNECE server	.pdf format		.docx format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
GRRF \| Session 83 \| 23-27 Jan 2017			38. The expert from ETRTO presented a revised proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/9 with provisions which were already supported at the last session. He introduced the revised transitional provisions related to new marking requirements. The experts from EC and UK proposed an alternative wording (GRRF-83-14). Both proposals received several comments. Therefore GRRF agreed to adopt the agreed provisions that would not be subject to transitional provisions and to remove the others, as reproduced in GRRF-83-23. 38. The expert from ETRTO presented a revised proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/9 with provisions which were already supported at the last session. He introduced the revised transitional provisions related to new marking requirements. The experts from EC and UK proposed an alternative wording (GRRF-83-14). Both proposals received several comments. Therefore GRRF agreed to adopt the agreed provisions that would not be subject to transitional provisions and to remove the others, as reproduced in GRRF-83-23. 38. The expert from ETRTO presented a revised proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/9 with provisions which were already supported at the last session. He introduced the revised transitional provisions related to new marking requirements. The experts from EC and UK proposed an alternative wording (GRRF-83-14). Both proposals received several comments. Therefore GRRF agreed to adopt the agreed provisions that would not be subject to transitional provisions and to remove the others, as reproduced in GRRF-83-23. 39. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit the adopted proposals ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/9 amended by Annex VI (based on GRRF-83-23 and GRRF-83-15) as well as ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/39 as draft Supplement 15 to Regulation No. 106 (Agricultural tyres) to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2017 sessions. 39. GRRF requested the secretariat to submit the adopted proposals ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2017/9 amended by Annex VI (based on GRRF-83-23 and GRRF-83-15) as well as ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/39 as draft Supplement 15 to Regulation No. 106 (Agricultural tyres) to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2017 sessions.