UN R0 Pretesting: Issue Report concerning "Inconsistency between approval number and its extension number"
Document SGR0-19-12/Rev.1
26 May 2016

Updated MLIT report raising concerns over the way approval numbers reflect the supplements covered. The draft Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement requires that each approval number include the applicable supplement number; however, the application for a change of the supplement number does not constitute application for an extension of the approval. As a result, the approval number will not be changed even if a different supplement comes into force, resulting in a product having a supplement number that is different from the actual number of the supplement in force.

Submitted by Japan and MLIT
Download document
Previous Documents, Discussions, and Outcomes
Related and Previous Documents
SGR0-19-12
Relates to UN R0 |