| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | UN R0 Pretesting: Issue Report concerning "Inconsistency between approval number and its extension number" | ||||||||
| Reference Number | SGR0-19-12/Rev.1 | ||||||||
| Date |
30 May 2016
|
||||||||
| Summary | Updated MLIT report raising concerns over the way approval numbers reflect the supplements covered. The draft Revision 3 of the 1958 Agreement requires that each approval number include the applicable supplement number; however, the application for a change of the supplement number does not constitute application for an extension of the approval. As a result, the approval number will not be changed even if a different supplement comes into force, resulting in a product having a supplement number that is different from the actual number of the supplement in force. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | Japan and MLIT | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R0 International Whole Vehicle Type Approval | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| SGR0-19-12 | UN R0 Pretesting: Issue Report concerning "Inconsistency between approval number and its extension number | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .docx format | ||||||||