1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Document Title ACSF function per category
Reference Number ACSF-05-13
Date
20 Jan 2016
Summary Table of requirements for automatically commanded steering function capabilities (e.g., hazard warning activation, driver alerts, minimum risk maneuvers, etc.) according the ACSF category.
Source(s) Japan
Rulemaking Area(s) UN R79 Steering Equipment
Meeting(s)
Related Documents
ACSF-05-15 Automated steering (ACSF) function per category overview
Downloads
UNECE server .pdf format .xls format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
ACSF | Session 5 | 20-22 Jan 2016

Presentation of J (ACSF-05-15)
(J): presented the document as a proposal, how the different requirements can be linked to other categories

(C-D): we should first check table for CAT C.

Discussion: how should the CATs be linked together – CAT B1 should not be a ACSF category

(D): CAT B1 should (only) be a system which enables a LKAS system to work continuously
(SE): confirmed D comments
(OICA): there may be systems in different countries, which would like to have single CAT C or CAT D systems
(C-D): is there a Contracting Party who proposes to have a single CAT C or CAT D system?
(F): if there will be systems on the market, we should not prohibit this.
(EC): we have to think about this
(D): CAT C Systems without CAT B makes no sense. D will not support a CAT C system alone.
(OICA): will bring proposals for a single CAT C system the next meeting.
(C-D): Are there concrete Systems in planning, which perform only CAT C?
(F): maybe there will be future systems of CAT C alone. We should not prohibit this. GRRF to decide.
(C-D): shares F opinion, but we have to specify a minimum safety standard.
(OICA): we should take in consideration, that ACSF is not reserved for High-End cars.
(F): cannot agree, that the row for CAT C is marked in “green” (edit.: so it remains yellow)