| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Comments on the Trilateral White Paper on Improvement in the Implementation of the 1998 Global Agreement | ||||||||
| Reference Number | WP.29-167-12 | ||||||||
| Date |
7 Nov 2015
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | MEMA, CLEPA, and JAPIA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | 1998 Agreement | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| WP.29-166-17 | Trilateral White Paper: Improvement in the Implementation of the 1998 Global Agreement | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| WP.29 | Session 167 | 10-13 Nov 2015 |
71. WP.29 agreed that agenda items 5.1 to 5.5 should be considered by AC.3. 112. AC.3 also considered WP.29-167-12 from MEMA/CLEPA/JAPIA. The representative of the three organizations made suggestions to define the programme of work, encouraged Contracting Parties to use domestic regulatory processes to communicate and share information for the sake of full transparency and public participation, such as “Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” in the United States of America. She also reiterated a recommendation to WP.29 and AC.3 to establish basic criteria to identify priorities to address the development of UN GTRs and identify possible barriers in developing them. 118. AC.3 decided to keep WP.29-167-12, WP.29-167-24 and WP.29-167-30 on the agenda and to form a drafting group with representatives of OICA, CLEPA/MEMA/JAPIA, the Chair of AC.3 and other interested parties, to review the trilateral white paper. |
||||||||