Presentation by the Secretariat giving the general information and WP.29 highlights

29. The secretariat reported on the highlights of the November 2019 session of WP.29 (GRBP-71-14). GRBP took note of this information.

2. GRBP considered and adopted the agenda (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/1, as amended by GRBP-71-01). GRBP noted the running order proposed by the Chair (GRBP-71-02-Rev.1). The list of informal documents is contained in Annex I of the session report. The list of GRBP informal groups is reproduced in Annex VIII.

The text was prepared by the expert from the International Motorcycle Manufacturers Association (IMMA) to amend Supplement 6 to 04 series of amendments, aiming to minimize proliferation of approval numbers

3. The expert from IMMA presented a revised proposal which aims to minimize a proliferation of approval numbers (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/25/Rev.1 and GRBP-71-18-Rev.2). Following an in-depth discussion, GRBP adopted the proposal, as laid down in Annex II. GRBP requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and the Administrative Committee (AC.1) for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as a draft Supplement 8 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 41, together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/24 adopted at the previous session.

Proposal to minimize proliferation of approval numbers from models with differences in vehicle exhaust and silencing systems.

4. The expert from IMMA proposed amendments with the aim to minimize proliferation of approval numbers from models with differences in vehicle exhaust and silencing systems (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/25). The experts from Germany, Japan, Russian Federation and Spain commented on the proposal. The Chair invited IMMA to prepare a revised document for the next session.

3. The expert from IMMA presented a revised proposal which aims to minimize a proliferation of approval numbers (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/25/Rev.1 and GRBP-71-18-Rev.2). Following an in-depth discussion, GRBP adopted the proposal, as laid down in Annex II. GRBP requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and the Administrative Committee (AC.1) for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as a draft Supplement 8 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 41, together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/24 adopted at the previous session.

Proposal is to correct an omission regarding the compensating resevoir fill time thereby aligning UN R41 with the other noise UN Regulations Nos. 9, 51 and 63.

5. The expert from IMMA proposed correcting an omission (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/24). GRBP adopted the document, but agreed to postpone its submission to WP.29 and AC.1, awaiting other amendment proposals.

3. The expert from IMMA presented a revised proposal which aims to minimize a proliferation of approval numbers (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/25/Rev.1 and GRBP-71-18-Rev.2). Following an in-depth discussion, GRBP adopted the proposal, as laid down in Annex II. GRBP requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and the Administrative Committee (AC.1) for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as a draft Supplement 8 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 41, together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/24 adopted at the previous session.

The text prepared by the expert from the International Motorcycle Manufacturers Association (IMMA) to amend UN Regulation No. 41-04 (up to Supplement 7), in order to clarify the implications of footnote one on the requirements specified in Annex 4.

4. The expert from IMMA proposed to clarify the specifications of the test site in Annex 4, following the end of the transitional period in paragraph 12.9. (GRBP-71-09). The experts from Germany, ISO and OICA raised questions on the purpose of the proposal. GRBP invited IMMA to discuss the issue with these experts and to prepare a revised proposal for the next session.

Proposal for amendment by IMMA to address the issue of stationary noise measurements on a single sided dual exhaust system.

5. The expert from IMMA proposed to modify the microphone position for measuring stationary noise in the case of several exhaust outlets (GRBP-71-10). GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex III, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as part of a draft Supplement 8 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 41.

The text was prepared by the expert from the International Motorcycle Manufacturers Association (IMMA) to amend the ASEP requirements

7. The expert from IMMA pointed out the differences in applying the concept of real driving between UN Regulation Nos. 41 and 51 (GRBP-71-19-Rev.1) and introduced draft revised ASEP provisions in UN Regulation No. 41 (GRBP-71-17). The Chair invited IMMA to continue working on this proposal in the framework of IWG ASEP with the aim to submit a formal document to the next session of GRBP.

Presentation by the expert of IMMA supporting the proposed amendment to ASEP (GRBP-71-17)

7. The expert from IMMA pointed out the differences in applying the concept of real driving between UN Regulation Nos. 41 and 51 (GRBP-71-19-Rev.1) and introduced draft revised ASEP provisions in UN Regulation No. 41 (GRBP-71-17). The Chair invited IMMA to continue working on this proposal in the framework of IWG ASEP with the aim to submit a formal document to the next session of GRBP.

GRBP to note the report from the TF MU on its aim to harmonize measures for evaluating systematic errors and random errors to improve the test procedures.

9. The expert from OICA reported on the progress of the Task Force on Measurement Uncertainties (TF MU) (GRBP-71-04) and presented a strategy on how to handle measurement uncertainties in UN Regulations (GRBP-71-21). GRBP noted that the suggested approach could first apply to UN Regulations Nos. 51 and 117 and, at a later stage, to other UN Regulations as well.

10. Given the importance of this topic, GRBP decided to convert TF MU into an Informal Working Group on Measurement Uncertainties (IWG MU) and approved its Terms of Reference (GRBP-71-05, GRBP-71-31-Rev.1), as laid down in Annex IV. GRBP noted that IWG MU would be chaired by Norway, while OICA would act as secretary.

The text proposed by the Chairman of TFMU for the guidelines on the objectives and rules of procedure of the task force.

9. The expert from OICA reported on the progress of the Task Force on Measurement Uncertainties (TF MU) (GRBP-71-04) and presented a strategy on how to handle measurement uncertainties in UN Regulations (GRBP-71-21). GRBP noted that the suggested approach could first apply to UN Regulations Nos. 51 and 117 and, at a later stage, to other UN Regulations as well.

10. Given the importance of this topic, GRBP decided to convert TF MU into an Informal Working Group on Measurement Uncertainties (IWG MU) and approved its Terms of Reference (GRBP-71-05, GRBP-71-31-Rev.1), as laid down in Annex IV. GRBP noted that IWG MU would be chaired by Norway, while OICA would act as secretary.

Text submitted by the expert of EC to update on the study and investigate the sound level limits of M- and N-category vehicles in Europe.

8. The expert of EC informed GRBP about a study on the sound level limits of M- and N-category vehicles which had started in December 2019 and was expected to be completed by June 2021 (GRBP-71-11). The aim of the study was to propose improved sound level limits for next phases of Regulation No. 540/2014 of the European Union in the coming years. The experts from Germany, ETRTO and OICA encouraged the study contractor to follow a holistic approach and to take into account various factors that contribute to sound emissions. GRBP invited those experts to send their comments to the contractor and requested the expert of EC to regularly inform GRBP about the study progress. The expert from Japan pointed out that his country would launch soon a similar study and that the recommendations of both studies should be harmonized internationally.

Update by the Chair of Task Force Measurement Uncertainty (TF MU) on the strategic approach to handle measurement uncertainties in UN Regulations

9. The expert from OICA reported on the progress of the Task Force on Measurement Uncertainties (TF MU) (GRBP-71-04) and presented a strategy on how to handle measurement uncertainties in UN Regulations (GRBP-71-21). GRBP noted that the suggested approach could first apply to UN Regulations Nos. 51 and 117 and, at a later stage, to other UN Regulations as well.

10. Given the importance of this topic, GRBP decided to convert TF MU into an Informal Working Group on Measurement Uncertainties (IWG MU) and approved its Terms of Reference (GRBP-71-05, GRBP-71-31-Rev.1), as laid down in Annex IV. GRBP noted that IWG MU would be chaired by Norway, while OICA would act as secretary.

Text by IWG ASEP for revision of ASEP as a future concept of real driving

6. On behalf of the Informal Working Group on Additional Sound Emission Provisions (IWG ASEP), the expert from Germany reported on the IWG ASEP activities (GRBP-71-25). He also introduced in detail the future revision of ASEP in UN Regulation No. 51, based on the concept of real driving and sound expectation model (GRBP-71-24).

Text submitted by chair of IWG ASEP for the status report

6. On behalf of the Informal Working Group on Additional Sound Emission Provisions (IWG ASEP), the expert from Germany reported on the IWG ASEP activities (GRBP-71-25). He also introduced in detail the future revision of ASEP in UN Regulation No. 51, based on the concept of real driving and sound expectation model (GRBP-71-24).

The text submitted by the Chairman of TF MU for the draft terms of reference

9. The expert from OICA reported on the progress of the Task Force on Measurement Uncertainties (TF MU) (GRBP-71-04) and presented a strategy on how to handle measurement uncertainties in UN Regulations (GRBP-71-21). GRBP noted that the suggested approach could first apply to UN Regulations Nos. 51 and 117 and, at a later stage, to other UN Regulations as well.

10. Given the importance of this topic, GRBP decided to convert TF MU into an Informal Working Group on Measurement Uncertainties (IWG MU) and approved its Terms of Reference (GRBP-71-05, GRBP-71-31-Rev.1), as laid down in Annex IV. GRBP noted that IWG MU would be chaired by Norway, while OICA would act as secretary.

Proposal to reconcile UN R138 with UN R51 with regard to maximum sound pressure levels at speeds greater than 20 km/h by clarifying that the 75 dB(A) limit for AVAS under UN R138 concerns only the 0-20 km/h speed range.

31. The expert from Germany proposed amendments to UN Regulation No. 138 with the aim to introduce a maximum sound level for the acoustic vehicle alerting system (AVAS) at speeds greater than 20 km/h (GRBP-70-04). Following a brief discussion, the Chair invited the expert to submit a working document for consideration at the next session.

Proposal to clarify that it is not necessary to require an ISO 10844 asphalt track surface in cases where the vehicle is at a standstill provided that the surface is dense and without substantial absorption characteristics.

11. The expert from Poland proposed to allow surfaces other than ISO 10844 for measurements in standstill condition (GRBP-71-28-Rev.1). GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex V, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as a draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 138.

ETRTO report on the study on the Dimensional Requirements for tyres with radial or run flat structure after having performed the load speed endurance test. ETRTO proposes to amend the UN Regulations No 30, 54 [and 75] by removing the requirements for tyres with radial and run flat structure.

12. The expert from ETRTO introduced a new Supplement to UN Regulation No. 30 and an accompanying transitional provision (paragraph 11.4.) that would delay for three months the mandatory application of the Supplement (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/3). In particular, he proposed excluding tyres with radial and run flat structure from the dimensional requirements after the load speed endurance test (GRBP-71-07). Various experts commented on the proposal and suggested modifications (GRBP-71-30). Finally, GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex VI, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as Supplement 22 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 30.

13. GRBP noted that the adopted transitional provision 11.4. does not contradict the WP.29 Guidelines for regulatory procedures and transitional provisions in UN Regulations (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2). At the same time, several GRBP experts expressed concerns about the rationale given by ETRTO for this provision which was the delays in issuance by the United Nations Office for Legal Affairs (OLA) of depository notifications about the entry into force of amendments to UN Regulations. GRBP was of the view that this is a general problem that affects all UN Regulations and other WP.29 Working Parties as well. Therefore, GRBP requested the Chair to raise this issue at the next session of the Administrative Committee for Coordination of Work (AC.2).

ETRTO proposal for amending tyre marking method by the removal of the use of wording “moulded” in the marking clause as this is only one of the various technical solutions currently available.

14. The expert from ETRTO proposed amending the tyre marking method in the UN Regulations (GRBP-71-08). Following a brief discussion, the Chair invited ETRTO to submit an official document to the next session.

Changes to the proposal to align definitions across tyre regulations and align the regulations with technological progress, correct an editorial error, and clarify that the ply rating is not applicable to T-type temporary use tyres.

12. The expert from ETRTO introduced a new Supplement to UN Regulation No. 30 and an accompanying transitional provision (paragraph 11.4.) that would delay for three months the mandatory application of the Supplement (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/3). In particular, he proposed excluding tyres with radial and run flat structure from the dimensional requirements after the load speed endurance test (GRBP-71-07). Various experts commented on the proposal and suggested modifications (GRBP-71-30). Finally, GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex VI, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as Supplement 22 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 30.

13. GRBP noted that the adopted transitional provision 11.4. does not contradict the WP.29 Guidelines for regulatory procedures and transitional provisions in UN Regulations (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2). At the same time, several GRBP experts expressed concerns about the rationale given by ETRTO for this provision which was the delays in issuance by the United Nations Office for Legal Affairs (OLA) of depository notifications about the entry into force of amendments to UN Regulations. GRBP was of the view that this is a general problem that affects all UN Regulations and other WP.29 Working Parties as well. Therefore, GRBP requested the Chair to raise this issue at the next session of the Administrative Committee for Coordination of Work (AC.2).

Proposal to align definitions across tyre regulations and align the regulations with technological progress (see document GRRF-82-21), correct an editorial error, and clarify that the ply rating is not applicable to T-type temporary use tyres.

12. The expert from ETRTO introduced a new Supplement to UN Regulation No. 30 and an accompanying transitional provision (paragraph 11.4.) that would delay for three months the mandatory application of the Supplement (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/3). In particular, he proposed excluding tyres with radial and run flat structure from the dimensional requirements after the load speed endurance test (GRBP-71-07). Various experts commented on the proposal and suggested modifications (GRBP-71-30). Finally, GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex VI, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as Supplement 22 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 30.

13. GRBP noted that the adopted transitional provision 11.4. does not contradict the WP.29 Guidelines for regulatory procedures and transitional provisions in UN Regulations (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1044/Rev.2). At the same time, several GRBP experts expressed concerns about the rationale given by ETRTO for this provision which was the delays in issuance by the United Nations Office for Legal Affairs (OLA) of depository notifications about the entry into force of amendments to UN Regulations. GRBP was of the view that this is a general problem that affects all UN Regulations and other WP.29 Working Parties as well. Therefore, GRBP requested the Chair to raise this issue at the next session of the Administrative Committee for Coordination of Work (AC.2).

Proposal to align the provisions for retreaded tyres to be tested and marked with the three-peak-mountain snow-flake (3PMSF) symbol with the amendment proposals to UN R117 (document GRBP/2019/19).

11. GRBP agreed to postpone consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/6 to the next session.

15. GRBP reverted to the postponed proposal on retreaded tyres to be tested and marked with the three-mountain-peak snow-flake (3PMSF) symbol, which was submitted by the experts of BIPAVER. GRBP adopted the document and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as Supplement 5 to UN Regulation No. 108.

In document GRRF/2016/40, an ellipsis “…”, indicating that the remainder of the sentence was to be retained, was omitted in the proposed amendment to paragraph 3.2.1. As a result, the remaining text was unintentionally removed following adoption of the proposal. A similar error resulted from the adoption of document WP.29/2017/9 regarding paragraph 4.9.2. This proposal also reintroduces the unintentionally deleted text.

16. The expert of BIPAVER proposed to restore several sentences which had been deleted by mistake in documents ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/40 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2017/9 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/4). GRBP adopted the correction and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as Supplement 10 to UN Regulation No. 109.

Proposal to align the provisions for retreaded tyres to be tested and marked with the three-peak-mountain snow-flake (3PMSF) symbol with the amendment proposals to UN R117 (document GRBP/2019/19).

12. GRBP agreed to postpone consideration of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/7 to the next session.

Proposal to align the provisions for retreaded tyres marked using the three-peak-mountain snow-flake (3PMSF) symbol with the amendment proposals to UN R117 (GRBP/2019/19) and to complement GRBP/2019/17.

17. The expert from BIPAVER presented a proposal that aligns the provisions for retreaded tyres marked with the three-peak-mountain snow-flake (3PMSF) symbol with the previously adopted amendment proposals to UN Regulation No. 117 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/5). GRBP adopted the document and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions as part of Supplement 10 to UN Regulation No. 109.

The status report submitted by the group of interested experts (GOIE) from Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Russian Federation, BIPAVER, ETRTO and OICA

19. On behalf of the Group Of Interested Experts on snow tyre provisions (GOIE), the expert from Germany reported on their progress (GRBP-71-20). In particular, he proposed establishing a new task force on studded tyres with the objective to draft a new UN Regulation on the approval of studded tyres regarding their snow performance. GRBP endorsed this proposal and noted that the duties of the Chair and Secretary of the task force would be performed by the experts from Finland and ETRTO, respectively.

20. With additional explanations of GOIE (GRBP-71-26), GRBP resumed discussion on the new class of special use tyres intended for use under severe snow conditions (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/14). GRBP noted that the proposed new class would provide for better road safety characteristics under severe snow conditions, but with a small increase in the rolling noise. The experts from Germany, Netherlands and Russian Federation supported the proposal. The expert from EC was not in position to agree to the proposal, due to the envisaged higher noise limits which would require modifications of European Union legislation. GRBP decided to revert to this issue at the next session.

Supporting information regarding the proposal for the type approval of special-use tyres designed for severe snow conditions.

19. On behalf of the Group Of Interested Experts on snow tyre provisions (GOIE), the expert from Germany reported on their progress (GRBP-71-20). In particular, he proposed establishing a new task force on studded tyres with the objective to draft a new UN Regulation on the approval of studded tyres regarding their snow performance. GRBP endorsed this proposal and noted that the duties of the Chair and Secretary of the task force would be performed by the experts from Finland and ETRTO, respectively.

20. With additional explanations of GOIE (GRBP-71-26), GRBP resumed discussion on the new class of special use tyres intended for use under severe snow conditions (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/14). GRBP noted that the proposed new class would provide for better road safety characteristics under severe snow conditions, but with a small increase in the rolling noise. The experts from Germany, Netherlands and Russian Federation supported the proposal. The expert from EC was not in position to agree to the proposal, due to the envisaged higher noise limits which would require modifications of European Union legislation. GRBP decided to revert to this issue at the next session.

Proposal from the group of interested experts to allow for the type approval of special-use tyres designed for severe snow conditions.

13. On behalf of the group of interested experts (GOIE) on snow tyre provisions, the experts from Germany and ETRTO introduced draft amendments which would allow the type approval of special use tyres that fulfil the requirements for snow performance in Annex 7 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/14). The experts of China, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and OICA raised several questions on the proposed new definitions and limits. The expert from EC made a reservation, because the EU member States should first reach a common position on the proposal which would set up new less stringent limits. The expert of the Russian Federation, being part of GOIE, volunteered to deliver a presentation at the next session with the aim to provide additional explanations. GRBP decided to continue this discussion at the next session.

19. On behalf of the Group Of Interested Experts on snow tyre provisions (GOIE), the expert from Germany reported on their progress (GRBP-71-20). In particular, he proposed establishing a new task force on studded tyres with the objective to draft a new UN Regulation on the approval of studded tyres regarding their snow performance. GRBP endorsed this proposal and noted that the duties of the Chair and Secretary of the task force would be performed by the experts from Finland and ETRTO, respectively.

20. With additional explanations of GOIE (GRBP-71-26), GRBP resumed discussion on the new class of special use tyres intended for use under severe snow conditions (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2019/14). GRBP noted that the proposed new class would provide for better road safety characteristics under severe snow conditions, but with a small increase in the rolling noise. The experts from Germany, Netherlands and Russian Federation supported the proposal. The expert from EC was not in position to agree to the proposal, due to the envisaged higher noise limits which would require modifications of European Union legislation. GRBP decided to revert to this issue at the next session.

The text submitted by the experts from the European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation (ETRTO) to amend the Japanese proposal for a Supplement to the 02 series of amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRBP/2020/6)

21. The expert from Japan introduced an amendment which addressed unique light trucks available on the Japanese market (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/6). The expert of ETRTO proposed a slight modification (GRBP-71-29). GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex VII, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions Supplement 12 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 117.

Proposal to adapt the rolling-sound measurement procedures to accommodate special C2 tyres presenting a section width wider than 200 mm, aspect ratio lower than 55, rim diameter code lower than 15 and without any dual fitting indication (i.e. the front size 175/75R15 LT and the rear size 235/50R14 LT or the front size 175/75R15 LT and the rear size 265/50R14 LT).

21. The expert from Japan introduced an amendment which addressed unique light trucks available on the Japanese market (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2020/6). The expert of ETRTO proposed a slight modification (GRBP-71-29). GRBP adopted the proposal, as contained in Annex VII, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their June 2020 sessions Supplement 12 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 117.

22. The expert from France, Chair of the IWG on Wet Grip Performance of Tyres in a Worn State (IWG WGWT), reported on their progress (GRBP-71-23). She pointed out that the IWG WGWT objectives were to present an informal document to the seventy-second session of GRBP in September 2020 and to submit a formal paper to the seventy-third session of GRBP in January 2021.

18. The expert of ETRTO pointed out the need for a new definition of “traction tyres”, because the current definition did not well segregate real traction tyres from non-traction ones (GRBP-70-19). The experts from OICA commented on the document. The Chair invited ETRTO, in cooperation with OICA, to prepare a formal proposal for consideration at the next session.

17. The expert from ETRTO provided an update of tyre industry and ISO activities on improving the wet grip test method for passenger car tyres (C1) (GRBP-70-20) and indicated his intention to submit a working document to the next session of GRBP. The Chair encouraged GRBP experts to send their comments to ETRTO.

ETRTO proposal for the replacement of the current Standard Reference Test Tyre as it is being phased out as production will stop mid of 2020. Snow performance test in R117 currently requires SRTT14 as a reference tyre. SRTT14 needs to be replaced and test procedure amended.

18. The expert from ETRTO reported that, in 2020-2021, the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) would be phasing out the Standard Reference Test Tyre SRTT14 (ASTM E1136) which was referenced in UN Regulations Nos. 108 and 117 (GRBP-71-06). Therefore, these references would need to be replaced by SRTT16 (ASTM F2493) tyre, and the test procedure should be amended accordingly. The Chair invited ETRTO to submit an official document with draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 117 for consideration at the next session. The expert from BIPAVER volunteered to cooperate with ETRTO with the aim to prepare similar amendments to UN Regulation No. 108.

Status report

23. On behalf of the Task Force on Reverse Warning (TF RW), the expert from Japan reported on the progress of TF RW (GRBP-71-27-Rev.1) and on the ongoing cooperation with the Working Party on General Safety (GRSG), thanks to the expert from Switzerland in his capacity as GRBP Ambassador to GRSG. GRBP noted that the next meeting of TF RW would be convened in Brussels from 25 to 27 May 2020.

28. The expert from the Netherlands presented a revised draft Resolution on Road Surface Labelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2019/2) and requested that it should be published as a reference document on the GRB website. GRB was also informed that WP.29, at its November 2018 session, had encouraged GRB to consult the road construction industry, to continue work on the draft Resolution and to report back to WP.29 in due course (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1142, para. 69). The Vice-Chair proposed to solicit views on the document of the national road authorities. To this end, GRB invited all experts to consult their national road administrations and send feedback to the Vice-Chair who volunteered to consolidate the replies and report back to GRB at its next session.

37. The representative from the Russian Federation introduced GRPE-79-07 raising awareness of non-exhaust particulate emissions from brake, tyre and road abrasion. The Chair highlighted the topic was in the agenda of IWG on PMP, highlighting the relevance of the topic. He also mentioned GRBP was considering a proposal from Netherlands on road surface labelling that included traffic noise reduction, wet skid resistance, rolling resistance and lifespan (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2019/2).

23. The expert from the Russian Federation reported on the feedback from GRBP experts on the Draft Resolution on Road Surface Labelling (GRBP-70-11). He indicated that replies had been received from Austria, Finland, France, Norway, Russian Federation, Switzerland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. According to the expert, the main conclusions of the survey were as follows:

• The Draft Resolution on Road Surface Labelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRB/2019/2) in many aspects does not seem suitable for international implementation;
• There was not much interest expressed to pursue the issue of grading and labelling road surfaces in the framework of GRBP;
• GRBP and WP.29 do not seem to be appropriate fora to consider this issue, as it is currently out of their scope;
• The issue should be communicated to the European Committee for Standardization (its technical committee CEN/TC 227) and/or to the relevant ISO technical committee, if available.

Presentation by the Secretariat giving the general information and WP.29 highlights

29. The secretariat reported on the highlights of the November 2019 session of WP.29 (GRBP-71-14). GRBP took note of this information.

Table of GRBP regulatory priorities and timelines.

29. The Chair presented a revised document on priorities of the future work (GRBP-70-10). The expert from EC reported on their ongoing study on requirements and test procedures for the tyre pressure monitoring system (TPMS) for vehicle categories M2, M3, N2, N3, O3 and O4 (GRBP-70-14) which might result in preparing amendment proposals to UN Regulation No. 141 on TPMS. GRBP decided to come back to the list of priorities, once the outcome of the study would be known.

30. The Chair introduced an updated list of priorities and recurrent items (GRBP-71-22-Rev.1). GRBP noted that AC.2, at its next meeting in March 2020, would consider such lists prepared by various Working Parties (GRs) with the aim to prepare the WP.29 programme of work for 2020.

Proposal from expert from France for amendment to Supplement 1. Tyre pressure monitoring system (TPMS) could refer to UN R64 (till 02 series of amendment) and/or R141.
R64 series 02 concerns temporary use spare unit, run-flat tyres and/or a run-flat system and/or a tyre pressure monitoring system for M1 or N1 category vehicles. R141 is dedicated M1-category vehicles approved for their TPMS

33. The expert from France proposed to add a reference to UN Regulation No. 141 (TPMS) to the communication form in Annex II to UN Regulation No. 142 (GRBP-71-12). GRBP supported the proposal and invited the expert from France to prepare an official document for the next session. In this context, the expert from the Russian Federation recalled the pending editorial amendments to UN Regulation No. 142 that had been agreed on by the former Working Party on Braking and Running Gear (GRRF) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2016/43).

Proposal to introduce tyre-pressure monitoring system tyre installation requirements for all vehicle categories in Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 following the requirements in UNECE Regulation No. 142.

31. The expert from EC presented a set of amendments to UN Regulation No. 141 (Tyre Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS)) with the aim to extend its scope, for the purpose of implementing the TPMS requirements in Regulation 2019/2144 of the European Union (GRBP-71-15). Several GRBP experts expressed concerns about the tight schedule in the European Union Regulation and the volume of the proposed amendments. To speed up the work, GRBP decided to establish a task force under the leadership of the expert from EC. All GRBP experts were invited to send him their comments on GRBP-71-15.

32. Similarly, the expert from EC introduced draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 142 (Installation of tyres) aimed at extending its scope, for the purpose of implementing the tyre installation requirements in Regulation 2019/2144 of the European Union (GRBP-71-16). GRBP requested the newly established task force (see para. 31) to consider this document as well.

Information from Chair on 2020 schedule of meetings of interest to GRBP experts

34. The expert from France presented a draft 2020 schedule of meetings that was of interest to GRBP experts (GRBP-71-13-Rev.1). GRBP welcomed this document as a useful planning tool and invited its IWGs and TFs to provide updates to the expert from France, with the aim to issue a revised schedule on the GRBP website.

In line with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, proposal to expand the scope of UN R142 to establish requirements for tyre-pressure monitoring systems for category M₂, M₃, N₂, N₃, O₃ and O₄ vehicles.

31. The expert from EC presented a set of amendments to UN Regulation No. 141 (Tyre Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS)) with the aim to extend its scope, for the purpose of implementing the TPMS requirements in Regulation 2019/2144 of the European Union (GRBP-71-15). Several GRBP experts expressed concerns about the tight schedule in the European Union Regulation and the volume of the proposed amendments. To speed up the work, GRBP decided to establish a task force under the leadership of the expert from EC. All GRBP experts were invited to send him their comments on GRBP-71-15.

32. Similarly, the expert from EC introduced draft amendments to UN Regulation No. 142 (Installation of tyres) aimed at extending its scope, for the purpose of implementing the tyre installation requirements in Regulation 2019/2144 of the European Union (GRBP-71-16). GRBP requested the newly established task force (see para. 31) to consider this document as well.