| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/129 |
|
Report on the development of the Flex-PLI legform impactor and its use within pedestrian protection performance testing. |
| Meeting Sessions: 161st WP.29 session (12-15 Nov 2013) |
| Document date: 22 Aug 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2013/36 |
|
Progress report submitted by the chair of the Informal Group on the Phase 2 development of the pedestrian safety GTR. |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 21 Dec 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Report of the World Forum on its 159th session |
| Reference Number: WP.29/1102 |
| Meeting Sessions: 159th WP.29 session (12-15 Mar 2013) |
| Document date: 25 Mar 13 |
| View full document file for more information |
| Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/120 |
| Meeting Sessions: 158th WP.29 session (13-16 Nov 2012) |
| Document date: 20 Jul 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2012/58 |
|
First progress report of the informal group developing the Flex-PLI legform impactor test tool for use in the GTR on pedestrian safety. |
| Meeting Sessions: 157th WP.29 session (26-29 Jun 2012) |
| Document date: 05 Apr 12 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2014/29 |
|
Progress report on the second-phase development of the GTR on pedestrian safety focused on the introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) as a single harmonized test tool in order to enhance the level of protection for lower legs of pedestrians. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 20 Dec 13 |
| Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety |
| Reference Number: WP.29-162-03 |
|
Phase 2 of GTR No. includes proposals for injury assessment reference values (IARV). The United States has asserted that the IARV have not been sufficiently validated through cost-benefit analysis, which is a requirement in US rulemaking. Therefore, the US has proposed to permit regulators to select IARV that correspond to their local vehicle populations. However, adding this qualification (through a footnote) would create a precedent for future GTR and OICA has lamented that such diversity in application hampers the goal of harmonization. Therefore, the GTR 9 informal group and GRSP are putting this issue before the World Forum for guidance. |
| Meeting Sessions: 162nd WP.29 session (11-14 Mar 2014) |
| Document date: 06 Feb 14 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety |
| Reference Number: GRSP-54-32 |
|
Statement of US concerns with the draft amendment to introduce the Flex PLI test tool into GTR No. 9 (document GRSP/2013/25) in particular with regard to the use of the injury assessment reference values (IARVs). US definition of the IARV will be dependent upon the outcome of a US cost-benefit analysis based upon the characteristics of the American vehicle population. The US cannot accept injury curves that do not fall within what is justifiable according to US traffic conditions. |
| Submitted by: USA |
| Meeting Sessions: 54th GRSP session (17-20 Dec 2013) |
| Document date: 17 Dec 13 |
|
Relevant to
|
| View full document file for more information |
| GRSP-54-32 | US comments on the draft amendment [2] to Global Technical Regulation No. 9 on pedestrian safety | |
| WP.29-162-03 | Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety | |
| WP.29-162-03 | Guidance, by consensus decision on elements of draft GTR No. 9 – Phase 2 that have not been resolved by the Working Party on Passive Safety | |
| WP.29/1102 | Report of the World Forum on its 159th session | |
| WP.29/2012/58 | First progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 | |
| WP.29/2012/120 | Second progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 | |
| WP.29/2013/36 | Third progress report for Phase 2 of Global Technical Regulation No. 9 | |
| WP.29/2013/129 | Fourth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 | |
| WP.29/2014/29 | Fifth progress report for Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 |