Proposal by IWG SLR introducing a completely new text based on previously introduced supplements

Proposal by IWG SLR introducing a completely new text based on previously introduced supplements

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal to amend text resulting that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal aim to allow driver assistance projections on the road ahead of the vehicle as part of the Adaptive Driving Beam (ADB), to allow the installation of Adaptive Driving Beams (ADB) on vehicles of category L₃, and otherwise to comprehensively clarify and update the text.

Proposal by IWG SLR introducing a completely new text based on previously introduced supplements

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal to amend text resulting that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal to amend text resulting that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal aim to allow driver assistance projections on the road ahead of the vehicle as part of the Adaptive Driving Beam (ADB), to allow the installation of Adaptive Driving Beams (ADB) on vehicles of category L₃, and otherwise to comprehensively clarify and update the text.

Proposal aim to allow driver assistance projections on the road ahead of the vehicle as part of the Adaptive Driving Beam (ADB), to allow the installation of Adaptive Driving Beams (ADB) on vehicles of category L₃, and otherwise to comprehensively clarify and update the text.

Proposal by IWG SLR introducing a completely new text based on previously introduced supplements

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal by the Informal Working Group on Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations (IWG SLR) with the aim to clarify and to correct the text that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal to amend text resulting that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal to amend text resulting that may be misinterpreted as if now only systems that include “means of an appropriate adjustment” need to be marked with the double-headed arrow, and symmetrical devices are no longer required to be marked.

Proposal aim to allow driver assistance projections on the road ahead of the vehicle as part of the Adaptive Driving Beam (ADB), to allow the installation of Adaptive Driving Beams (ADB) on vehicles of category L₃, and otherwise to comprehensively clarify and update the text.