Proposal to extend the scope of UN R131 to include light vehicles in line with priorities in Japan, the EU, and USA with regard to the installation of AEB systems on passenger cars and light trucks.

Proposal to authorize the establishment of an expert group to draft test procedures and performance requirements for M1/N1 with regard to automatic emergency braking, including stationary and moving obstacles, and for pedestrian AEBS.

Revised version of the draft terms of reference (document GRRF-83-18) to authorize the establishment of an expert group to draft test procedures and performance requirements for M1/N1 with regard to automatic emergency braking, including stationary and moving obstacles, and for pedestrian AEBS.

Proposal to restrict manual deactivation of AEB systems to speeds under 30 km/h. The proposal would require automatic reactivation of the AEBS when the vehicle speed exceeds 30 km/h.

Objectives and rules of procedure for the informal group established to expand the scope of UN R131 to include M₁ and N₁ vehicles. The informal group proposal leaves open the option to develop AEBS requirements for these vehicles as a new UN Regulation.

OICA/CLEPA comments on the proposal to restrict manual deactivation of AEB systems to speeds under 30 km/h, noting cases where, given the current state of the technology, manual deactivation (regardless of speed) is warranted.

“In depth cost-effectiveness analysis of the identified measures and features regarding the way forward for EU vehicle safety”: In 2015, the European Commission published the report conducted by TRL: “Benefit and Feasibility of a Range of new Technologies and Unregulated Measures in the Fields of Occupant Safety and Protection of Vulnerable Road Users”. The report considered more than 50 safety measures that could be implemented as part of the amendment to the General Safety Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 661/2009) and the Pedestrian Safety Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 78/2009). This TRL study reviews in more detail the 24 candidate measures selected by the Commission for potential inclusion in the regulations.

Potential impact of automatic braking on stationary and moving rear-end collisions in Japan.

1. Definition of AEBS
2. Speed Range
3. Timing of Braking Control
4. Collision Judgment Line
5. Requirement of Braking Deceleration
6. Enhance Damage Reducing Effect Collision Risk Judgment Line
7. Emergency Event Preparation and Collision Warning
8. Other Principal Requirements

OICA and CLEPA positions on the development of regulatory requirements for light vehicle automatic emergency braking systems.

Japanese guidelines on automated emergency braking systems (AEBS) pursuant to Kokujigi No. 353 of February 21, 2003 as amended by Kokujigi No. 181 of November 15, 2005, Kokujigi No. 143 of October 25, 2007, Kokujigi No. 139 of October 7, 2008, and Kokujigi No. 127 of June 30, 2011.