|
95. The World Forum considered draft amendments under agenda items 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.4 to 4.9.9, 4.9.11, 4.9.12, 4.9.14 and 4.9.15 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
96. For agenda items 4.9.3, 4.9.10 and 4.9.13, the GRE Chair proposed the following editorial corrections: - Agenda tem 4.9.3., ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2024/18, title, for ‘Proposal for Supplement 13 to the original series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 45’ read ‘Proposal for Supplement 13 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 45’.
- Agenda item 4.9.10, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2024/25, Annex 10, Table A10-1, delete an empty line.
- Agenda item 4.9.13, document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2024/28, paragraph 6.22.9.1., for ‘item 9.3.2.3.’ read ‘item 9.2.2.3.’
97. Subject to the above corrections, the World Forum considered draft amendments under agenda items 4.9.3, 4.9.10 and 4.9.13 and recommended their submission to AC.1 for voting.
98. The representative of Japan pointed out their full support to the proposal for new 09 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 under agenda item 4.9.13. (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2024/28) and stressed its importance to road safety.
|
WP.29/2024/18 | UN R45: Proposal for Supplement 13 to the 01 series of amendments
|
UN R45: Proposal for Supplement 13 to the 01 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2024/18
|
|
Proposal to remove the list of classes and to refer in general only to passing-beams and driving-beams.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 192nd WP.29 session (4-8
Mar 2024)
|
|
Document date: 19 Dec 23
|
|
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2024/18), as amended by para. 96, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 48 applying UN R45 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29/2024/25 | UN R149: Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments
|
UN R149: Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 01 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2024/25
|
|
Proposal to remove the failure mode and light source failure detection requirements for the cornering lamp, to modify the photometric stability test point of the passing beam and adaptive front-lighting system (AFS) Class C, and to correct and clarify the text of the 01 series of amendments.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 192nd WP.29 session (4-8
Mar 2024)
|
|
Document date: 20 Dec 23
|
|
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2024/25), as amended by para. 96, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties out of the 59 applying UN R149 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-eight voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
WP.29/2024/28 | UN R48: Proposal for a new 09 series of amendments
|
UN R48: Proposal for a new 09 series of amendments
|
|
Reference Number: WP.29/2024/28
|
|
Proposal to introduce new requirements for headlamp levelling, in particular on the vertical inclination in relation to the dipped-beam headlamp mounting height, to permit manual levelling only for off-road vehicles, to clarify usage of daytime running lamps (DRL) with other lamps, to improve the definition of photometric stability and provisions for visibility of red light, to introduce provisions for lighting under parked condition and for manoeuvring lamps on trailers, to enable the phasing out of the installation of older lamps and devices following the measures undertaken pursuant to the simplification of lighting regulations under GRE, to introduce technology-neutral failure provisions, and to correct and otherwise clarify the text.
|
|
Meeting Sessions: 192nd WP.29 session (4-8
Mar 2024)
|
|
Document date: 21 Dec 23
|
|
Document status: Adopted by WP.29
|
|
Relevant to
|
|
Adoption Vote
|
|
This proposal (WP.29/2024/28), as amended by para. 96, was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-six Contracting Parties out of the 52 applying UN R48 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-six voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.
|
|
View full document file for more information
|
|