Listing notations

Note Document Agenda Provision Meeting Headline Filedate Vote Rule
RIVA related? Proposal seems to set requirement in terms of use case scenarios. 16111 Show Edit Destroy
There cannot be a regulation dedicated to a technology with an "if-fitted" clause. If a manufacturer is applying for approval, they obviously have the technology on the vehicle. OICA interprets "if fitted" to mean that a CP does not have to mandate the technology, but can still use the regulation in cases where the technology is optional. Frost says CP can first decide whether to sign the regulation. Then whether just to accept approvals. Then whether to require technology. Frost does not see "if fitted" as changing this and agrees that you cannot apply the BAS regulation to a vehicle without BAS. OICA still concerned that under IWTVA a CP may interpret "shall" to mean mandatory installation. Guichard says that's issue for UN R0, not UN R142--component regulation specifies provisions for approval of a system and its installation on a vehicle. Bocharev says OICA concern is about implementation of regulation, not the regulation itself. 15646 7063 Show Edit Destroy
Same as 2018/03. No problem with clarifying the year of the ISO standard. 15648 7063 Show Edit Destroy
Two items. 1) align what has been done in UN R79 and R13/13-H. Consistency in use of remote controls for parking, including release of parking brake. Frost raises concern over UN R79 language since proposal seems to describe RCM rather than RCP which raises question over when RCM ends. OICA repeats UN R79 definition of RCP as an ACSF-A system for low-speed parking and maneuvering. Also says that driver does not have direct control over functions: it's an on-off where the system controls the maneuver from start to finish. Does UN R79 describe the "unparking maneuver"? Does the vehicle reapply the parking brake after pulling out and stopping. UN R79 says that whenever the vehicle is stationary, the system must prevent the vehicle from rolling away. This can be handled by automatic transmission to park, actuate service brake, or turn off engine. Germany: does the proposal need additional provision to cover brake behavior at end of unpark maneuver? Frost: 5.6.1.2.6 on rolling away addresses interrupted maneuver. 5.6.1.2.5 only addresses when the engine is switched off at the end of parking maneuver. OICA interprets unparking as unfinished parking maneuver so 5.6.1.2.6 applies. Proposal approved. 16084 7063 Show Edit Destroy
2) stop lamp signal under regenerative braking. currently 2 thresholds. no signal under 0.7m/s2. over 1.3 m/s2 must generate signal. in between, may generate signal. OICA concern for one-pedal driving where release of accelerator activates regenerative braking to save energy and brake wear. (akin to endurance braking on heavy vehicles). CP concerns over too many signals under very light deceleration and France concern over when braking stops. Frost recalls that regenerative braking not allowed for use as service braking under Cat A, but can be used under Cat B where braking signal generated. Part of concern to ensure that friction materials remain clean and ready for use. OICA: Cat A regen not part of service braking where Cat B can be part of service braking. Problem is coasting to a stop under regenerative braking where under 0.7 requires brake lights to be turned off. So maybe address concerns by specifying that lights remain on if deceleration continuous from the higher threshold. Reg allows regen blended with service braking, but UK concerned about consistency of user experience between friction braking and regen braking (because regen braking a function of battery charge so not uniform). Chair thinks need to make sure regen requirements fully understood in light of proposed changes. So proposes to adopt (1) and return to discussion of (2) in September. Accepted and, since informal doc, annex to session report. 7063 Show Edit Destroy
approved and will be dealt with by the secretariat as an erratum. 16137 7063 Show Edit Destroy
Germany: what is off-road? Specify that additional requirements to current ACSF. Excluded remote handling controls from RCP, so raises issue. France: d'accord avec Allemagne--c'est quoi exactement hors route? UK: definitely not on any public roads, system could be fitted to on-road capable vehicles, but system restricted to off-road. Agree to clarify that ACSF-A system only. OICA: concern about GPS coverage and feasibility of having two independent means to verify position. Obstacle detection with auto stop technically problematic when vehicle purpose to penetrate through brush, etc. As explained in OICA proposal, also does not address many other applications for RCM, including outside ACSF (have existed since well before ACSF discussions). Need to further discuss. Looks like irreconcilable difference between CP and OICA views. 15650 7086 Show Edit Destroy
CPs, including France, Netherlands, Czech Republic, raised technical reservations. Since informal document, won't be adopted at this session, so time to resolve and submit as formal document at September GRRF. 16064 7087 Show Edit Destroy
ACSF decided to work on ACSF B2 (L3) first and then C2. Had considered working both in parallel. See first brainstorming list of 13 items 16107 7087 Show Edit Destroy
imperative to get B2 within ToR mandate deadline and so question on whether really feasible to handle everything in ACSF report. Also why mandate to look at L3-L4 but report on L2-L3? Does ACSF have expertise to handle since elements, such as longitudinal control, merging of systems, that are beyond steering and UN R79. Frost: don't need new group (don't want to go to WP.29 to ask for new group)--transition in ACSF--bring TFCS into ACSF work, etc.--discuss data with GRSG (will they deliver something to GRRF or does GRRF do something or do we collaborate). don't want to keep asking to extend mandates. Wants to work out strategy for delivering results, describe packets in order of priority to work out schedule. break from GRRF to hold ACSF session so can return in morning with plan. 7087 Show Edit Destroy
NL opposes--UN R13-H gives 0.7 m/s<sub>2</sub> threshold and specifically wanted to avoid brake lamp illumination just from slowing by engine retardation. UK agrees that proposal should use R13-H specifications. Canada concurs, adding that frequent lamp activation would dilute significance of stop lamp. Frost adds concerns from regen braking discussion earlier in the week. Decision took into account interest in harvesting kinetic energy, but specifically looked at relation with service brake such that cat A and cat B regen braking systems. Recommends aligning with R13-H provisions. Regen used for energy purposes should only send brake signal at high deceleration to avoid confusion with engine braking. 16144 7071 Show Edit Destroy
Informal group decided not to further consider re-manufactured calipers: would require new regulation because involves different manufacturing process. Will not pursue pending further information to support action. 7072 Show Edit Destroy
4K traffic deaths last year in Colombia. Created National Road Safety Agency (in 2011?). Goal to harmonize Colombian regulations with international standards. Know that many vehicles sold in Colombia do not meet international standards as shown in Latin NCAP testing. So that's why we commit to being part of this global forum on vehicle safety. Wants a real transformation among governments of LA. Presidential terms ends this year. Safety currently a state policy, not a program, so look to continue efforts after change of administrations. 7319 Show Edit Destroy
Discussion over creation of new GR for automated technologies or stop-gap measure to put under GRRF. GRRF option to transfer tyre items from GRRF to GRB with GRRF focused on steering, braking, and automation. Yarnold supporting this "reshaping GRRF" based on UN resources. France position that there should be a new GR given importance of subject. France also argues GRRF does not have expertise in advanced technologies. It's still a new topic for GRRF experts. US wants issue to be fully considered and put in writing to ensure a proper and efficient creation of appropriate forum. Germany supports GRRF as intermediate, but will concrete commitment to new dedicated GR. Frost suggests "emotional" reaction among some parties: difficult to find resources to address all issues present. Even if we created a new reg on automated braking, will impact 13 and 13-H because overlaps. Current regs impacted and aligned with new regs. Also possibility of adding third GRRF session to allow more resources. Industry waiting for regs in order to bring product to market, cannot be responsible for delay. Yarnold asks CPs to get clearance for eventual vote on solution, whether new GR, third GRRF, or other. 7105 Show Edit Destroy
2018/2 subject to final review so deferred to June session. FIA wants WP.29 to maintain oversight of cybersecurity, software updates, and broad issues (as opposed to putting everything under GRRF). Three points: a) how long shall vehicle manufacturer support updates for vehicles, b) software and hardware updates, c) use reference model that can stand test of time, not based on 2017. 7105 Show Edit Destroy
paras. 12 & 13 & 19. 19 raises idea of separate GR. Also notes DETA developments, including German offer to host. 7106 Show Edit Destroy
GTR 9 Flex PLI and BTA approved; however, work remains so ask for mandate extension to end 2018 (OK). DPPS under task force, so GRSP wants tf upgrade to iwg (OK). WorldSID mandate extension to end 2018 to consider German proposal for advisory group of experts (academics, mfrs, other experts) that can formulate amendments to MR2 (OK). Adopted second-level warning for rear seat belt reminders under UN R16. Request for new iwg on protective helmets because new research on biomechanics of head protection (OK). GRSP agreed to UN R44 phase out, crotch straps, etc. GRSP agreed to dissolve iwg on ECRS. 7113 Show Edit Destroy
François Guenot from WP.29 as secretary. Agreement to pursue RDE harmonization-remains to be decided whether to develop particular activities under the 1998 Agreement and/or 1958 Agreement. 06 and 07 series amendment supplements on SCR provisions and value of reagent container, but found errors after session so adopted for June but will be reviewed at June GRPE and push amendments to Nov WP.29 session. WLTP amend. 4 approved for June WP.29 session. Agreed to hold off on amendments to GTR 15 to bring one consolidated amendment per year to WP.29. WLTP UNR only Type I and IV tests (since covered by GTR 15 and 19 EVAP). Fuel economy measurement harmonization for heavy-duty vehicles. Some aspects hard to harmonize, but others can be pursued as first step. Again open question whether to pursue under 1998, 1958, or both. 7114 Show Edit Destroy
OICA willing to pay half the estimated 100K€ budget to establish providing long term operating funding present (i.e., don't want to finance an experiment closed down after 2-3 years). DoC as developed under IWVTA not satisfactory. ETRTO, OICA, CLEPA will support UI if handled by UN. Budget is the main issue. UK will support if other CPs will support. Australia willing to support. CITA expresses support. German intention to start immediately to put DETA in place and be operational within 4 months (Stage 0 where can only exchange TA documents). VIN database in Stage 2. Other ideas: Use of DETA for software: SW approval numbers, including versions/updtates, which SW can be used on which vehicles/systems. Use of DETA for PTI. 7136 Show Edit Destroy
Target for Jan 2019 GRPE. Not ready for transpo into UN R (resource issue). 7189 Show Edit Destroy
[Eric's report] WP.1 draft document on driving and secondary tasks. WP.1 resolution on the deployment of highly automated vehicles into traffic intended before year end. WP.1 meets next week. [Frost] Concerned about cursory acceptance of secondary tasks. No knowledge on technologies that would make such behavior acceptable. Needs to be coordination to move in tandem based upon what is technically possible at this time. [Eric] Will take relationship with technical feasibility into account in text of WP.1 document. GRRF: remote controlled maneuvering, but little on "valet parking". Expect current RCM to expand, but haven't started discussions yet. Also relates to pods under control of central operator. [WP.1] Currently concept of operator beside vehicle, but not yet pods or distance control although some discussion given testing and proto-programs. 7325 Show Edit Destroy
Commission proposal to allow temporarily until 31 December 2019 while specific amendments are established for the list of UN Regulations in OICA document. This would allow amendments to clarify application by the GRs. OICA says good transitional solution but would like paragraph in WP.29 report while avoiding changes to new guidelines document. 7369 Show Edit Destroy
IMMA refers to WP.29-174-03 to ask for inclusion of motorcycle lighting regulation. 7369 Show Edit Destroy
Change approval numbers from 4 to 6? Switzerland would need consent of Federal Council to implement this change. Onoda-san says not change to UN Regulation but to Schedule. Change can be effected by administrative procedures under Rev.3. AC.1 will consider but must be voted in unanimity not 4/5 majority (because touches 1958 Agreement??). Frost: issue of approvals under UN R90 because principle of approving in test groups has been removed (so UN R90 could result in 30 or more separate approvals for essentially identical parts). Substantially raises testing costs which would impact consumer pricing if interpretation is correct. Guichard mentions similar concern with UN R117. Wet grip, rolling resistance included in tire marking. Don't have answer for UN R90 because of the way marking requirements written. General issue of marking requirements under IWVTA. Either modify regulations to comply with Schedule 4 or modify Schedule 4 to allow flexibility for UN Regulation marking provisions. Frost: issue not marking/numbering issue but test groups under UN R90 and because of financial implications need to find swiftest solution. 7370 Show Edit Destroy
CI intends to propose an end to approvals under UN R44 from the earliest possible date now that UN R129 development is complete. 7383 Show Edit Destroy
Addendum not under consideration for adoption. Vote only on principal document. 7388 Show Edit Destroy
Addendum not under consideration for adoption. Vote only on principal document. 7387 Show Edit Destroy
Footnote, in-use compliance or in-service conformity but not in-service compliance existing concept. PTI group confirms term chosen consciously to avoid confusion with type approval terms. ToR adopted, keeping terms in brackets. 7425 Show Edit Destroy
Japan agrees on need to address automation, connectivity, etc. in PTI but concerned over national requirements and wish to ensure harmony even with those outside 1997 Agreement. 7425 Show Edit Destroy
[No quorum] 7464 Show Edit Destroy
Japan, UK treats document as homologous to GRVA agenda. In other words, treating "new 1998 Agreement priorities" as a agenda on autonomous vehicles. 7447 Show Edit Destroy
GTR 18 OBD II for 2020. 7448 Show Edit Destroy
parallel amendments to GTR 7 and UN R25 to GRSP at December 2018 session based on bracketed IARV developed using empirical methods. Informal doc would be presented prior to GRSP to confirm intention based upon one IWG session. Extend mandate by one year to next summer. Edoardo requests update IWG status report. 7451 Show Edit Destroy
document 4 postponed since AVERE representative (Tesla Jos Dings??) not present. 7598 Show Edit Destroy
Opposition to two phases, delay in cyclist protection, and to deactivation function/design. 17288 Show Edit Destroy
OICA explains table of "principles", stakeholders agree not principles: elements; paradigm shift gets more attention; Canada: paradigm shift slide: multiple drivers licenses; test new drivers with hardest maneuvers (parallel parking); how will address new situations. OICA: humans good drivers--millions of statistical km to produce collision; argues based on driver's permit approach: challenges analogy of driver tests using most difficult tests--more challenging circumstance in real world traffic; Sweden: in-use compliance; AAPC: not just approval testing, drivers permit + traffic laws (performance over time); possibilities to be assured of safety through testing prior to TA testing; UK: driver learns but car doesn't; OICA: cars do learn; plus learns as a fleet; UK: will need continuing validation with SW updates; [Discussion of complexity of certifying software updates--"of course" major updates have to be re-approved];Ododa-have to be clear for what we explain to GRVA/WP.29 (three pillars, etc.); examples of different pillars functions slide: typical traffic=>rwtd, critical traffic=>test track, edge cases=>simulation; can apply multiple methods of the pillars (can run track, rwtd, and simulation to cover normal traffic situation); 17956 Show Edit Destroy
180129: GRVA postpones until September. 18186 Show Edit Destroy
OICA doc 10: editorial mistake concerning alignment of C2C and C2P: copied M1 values for N1 vehicle (should align N1 C2P with N1 C2C, not M1 C2C). Japan: OICA correct so accept proposal to change table. 8377 Show Edit Destroy
<u>2019/25</u> 4.8. The approval markings required by this UN Regulation <strike>may</strike> <b>shall</b> not be replaced by a Unique Identifier (UI) described in Schedule 5 to the 1958 Agreement." <i>Document adopted as amended.</i> <u>01-12</u> amended to add L<sub>6</sub> and L<sub>7</sub> under 5.3.4.1.1. <i>adopted and will be added to 2019/25 as package.</i> 8378 Show Edit Destroy
ITC director's remarks (Lee) with emphasis on climate change and transition to electric vehicles. 10181 23 Nov 2021 Show Edit Destroy
FRAV to determine if external signaling is needed and if so, to whom and under what conditions and also general positioning where to be visible (e.g., front, lateral, rear). Once determined, send tp GRE [or other relevant GR]. Talk to Antonio and Walter for grammar (by whom) and stipulation that could be other group than GRE. Safer Streets accreditation approved for two years Clean Air Association-referred to GRPE Auto-SAR-referred to GRVA OICA: Has external signaling been decided? Me: No. Under discussion. OICA: Need coordination between WP.1 and WP.29 to be sure all consistent. Antonio: Each party does their work. If conflict, reconcile such as was done for conflict concerning emergency lighting signaling. EC: OICA says urgency for clarification. Is there a deadline? Antonio: possible deadlines to be decided by GRVA and GRE. Richard: Communicating with WP.1 as GRVA chair. WP.29 should have position that can be presented to WP.1. Should avoid "blue lamps" in one country and "green lamps" in another. 9985 23 Nov 2021 Show Edit Destroy
GRVA approached by WP.1 about holding a joint meeting/event next year. 9992 24 Nov 2021 Show Edit Destroy
DETA discussion on extending program to support the VMAD scenario catalog. [This raises an issue for countries not parties to the 1958 Agreement and/or not using type approvals.] 2019/77 amendments to UI. 10008 24 Nov 2021 Show Edit Destroy
Opening Remarks UNECE secretary Japan: Notsu MLIT Director Engineering • Safety: Keyword “VRU” • CO2 emissions-lifecycle assessment • Make WP.29 more attractive and increase participation • 27th ESV: 3-6 April 2023 in Yokohama Korea: Ji-Hong Park: DG of Motor Vehicle Bureau Nicklaus: DG GROW • Green and digital transition • Zero emission by 2035 for cars, target for bus, truck pending • End-of-Life vehicles • Small-series AV regulation • Access to vehicle data • 2050 target for zero fatalities—framework EIF in couple of days 10764 21 Jun 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Intention is to update "complex electronic control systems"' assessment based mainly on work done under UN R79 to handle ACSF. UK is working with OICA on an updated CEL annex. Discussions still under way, so text is not final. Hoping to provide at least an informal document for the next GRVA with aim to adopt the electromechanical braking (EMB) proposal at the same time in a single package. 29441 29 Sep 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Main aim to address demands for CO2 reduction. Relates to introduction of "e-axles" which come in two main configurations/use cases. CLCCR interested in electric regenerative braking systems covering simple dynamo systems and more complex/advanced systems. Very simple systems below 60 kW level are out of scope because no issues with braking (vehicle stability, communication with master braking system of towing vehicle, etc.). CLCCR in beginning of this process, so document and proposal provided to solicit feedback. OICA has some issues but can work through them with CLCCR. CLEPA also has issues: stresses that amendment also covers <b>caravans</b>. Intention to submit a new document for GRVA-15 as a formal document. 29404 29 Sep 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Envisions two-step approach: 13-H CEL annex into UN R78 and then after UN R13 CEL elaborated, introduce revised CEL provisions. Document will be updated to a formal document for GRVA-15. 29400 10807 29 Sep 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Netherlands sees no value in UI. Russia has similar view. Paper technically to decide whether UI should be prohibited ("careful phrasing of text"-François G.). Document will be revised but likely will need more changes. Decision to continue discussion at next session. Richard D. notes that application of UI would depend on CP proposing to use it (registering a UI under DETA?). 29372 30 Sep 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Same modifications as for the 02 series (GRVA/2022/22). 29254 30 Sep 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Sweden stressed their support for DEOP work. 10880 14 Nov 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Frances sees potential conflict between GRSG VRU-Proxi and GRVA in dealing with UEBS proposal. Suggests creating joint expert group to deliver views next March or June. See if we can reach consensus on how to handle and tech feasibility. OICA Yves: Work progressing well on CV direct vision; not sure what UEBS is. See potential conflict with two alternative to meet same concern. Appreciates tech-neutral aim. Welcomed German proposal for UEBS but concerned about uncertainty and not sure about technical requirements and whether truly equivalent solution. Damm supportive to allow for alternative solutions to VRU safety. Decision to organize cooperation per French proposal. <u>Heavy vehicle EDR</u> Jane repeats that co-chairs discussed and agreed that March and November deadlines not feasible. Issue involves new areas and reliance on North American experts educating others. EU: 1958 Agreement with position of 27 CPs represented by Commission. EDR/DSSAD: decision to aim to finalize for November 2023 based on initial WP.29 proposal for March 2023 allowing for GRSG review in October 2023. <u> H-point machine</u> Reconcile differences between UN Regs and GTR in use of H-point. GRSG accepted SAE reference so decision for NL to get in touch with SAE. Also ISO standard on upper and lower leg use. Edoardo notes that H-point is also a GRSP issue. Longstanding problem interfering with application of UN Regs and GTR. Want SAE and ISO permission to use text in MR2. 10886 14 Nov 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Issue that UN R94 and R95 better addresses crash impact testing so UN R34 provides some redundant provisions in this regard. 29554 15 Nov 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Deleted "immobilizer" in brackets in para. 1 of the amendment to Annex 6. Since list of examples (e.g.), EC okay to delete. 29564 15 Nov 2022 Show Edit Destroy
Korea supports proposal but also noted support for accelerator pedal error proposal from Japan in GRVA. 10922 15 Nov 2022 Show Edit Destroy
EU said they support but will not make this regulation mandatory. 10922 15 Nov 2022 Show Edit Destroy
The agendas were adopted. 11958 2621 2 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
The agenda was adopted. 11958 2621 5 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
2024 calendar: GRPE canceled May session and organizing a workshop. GRVA "informal" May session. Looking to hold 2025 GR session in Bangkok (ESCAP). WP.1-WP.29 coordination on automation (GRs should see earlier document (WP.29-190-07)). Richard thanks secretariat for GRVA US meeting and for 2025 session at UN ESCAP). 11960 2621 5 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
WP.29-190-07 WP.1 coordination document 11960 2621 5 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
Programme of work adopted (even though revised document not posted yet). EC urges streamlining of document and priorities. 11961 2621 5 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
Table updated to reflect iwg and workshops with "challenging" June 2026 deadline for GTR and UNR. Objective of March Ottawa meeting to prepare schedule of meetings. Supporting comments: EC, Canada, Japan, China, USA, UK, OICA, CLEPA. Richard notes OICA, JASIC, SAE, and AAPC secretary support. WP.29 adopts table. 11962 2621 5 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
Richard explains GRVA formal plus informal amendment, including title change as draft guidance reference. Impact of AI on NATM. Requires further elaboration before any consideration as resolution or other legal instrument. Asking for WP.29 endorsement. Canada (IS): Asks if required to have WP.29 endorsement. Supportive of proposal as guidance document but as such does not see need for formal endorsement. EC (AL): Agrees with Canada. OICA (YvdS): Surprised by discussion: if not endorsed, document is "nothing". Canada: Should be noted as document subject to further discussion across WP.29. Important topic but do not see need for "full endorsement" as WP.29 position. ITU (RS): AI "tremendously important". Agree with Canada, but sees need for formal attention to AI application to automotive. "Take head out of sand" to commit resources and develop robust outcomes. OICA: Agree important; also "living". Work will continue but need to start somewhere. Current document provides that basis. UK (DK): All agree important but also why difficult to agree on document. Needs more development before being brought up as document for WP.29 endorsement. WP.29 agrees to welcome document as a basis for continuation of work towards WP.29 statement/position/resolution. GRVA (RD) asks about further GRVA work--notes that text goes beyond automation and relates to scope of other GR. Asks WP.29 to discuss how to go further/deeper. OICA (Jan): More room, so proposed at GRVA to hold workshop (OICA/CLEPA organized) to define purpose of document and then develop in right directions. 11962 2621 5 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
Triggered discussion on GTR 20 Phase 2 EVS, especially harmonization under 1998 Agreement. EC suggesting "June solution" for UNR with GTR amendment TBD later. USA opposes. EW: EV issues raised in SCUNV. Japan TO accepts SIG to work on UN R100, says strongly supported by AC.2. ECE-WN brings up Art. 7 of 1998A: CPs obliged to initiate national rulemaking (so "legal certainty" to ensure harmonization). WP.29 agrees with SIG to amend UN R100 with TP test methods. 11970 2621 6 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
EVS informal group mandate extended 12 months (based on US proposal), so until March 2025 WP.29 session. 12071 2621 6 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
EU: Amendment 1 approved by GRPE in January, including provisions for replacement brake parts, worst case scenario testing, and determination of vehicle coefficient for dynamometer testing. So expect WP.29 vote in June. Side activities: round robin testing for measurement uncertainties evaluation. 12069 2621 6 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
HD substantially different from light-duty. Expected proposal for WP.29 vote in March 2025. 12068 2621 6 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
EDR/DSSAD informal group withdraws draft guidance document and requests to remove EDR from AC.3 agenda. Guidance document not needed. 12066 2621 6 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy
Unresolved question on whether to authorize work on a GTR. Chair requested TOR if want to develop GTR. US (EW) clarifies that ad hoc group was upgraded to informal group but currently gathering data and views before reaching decision on GTR development. Canada (IS): Supports possibility for GTR but notes current work on studying best practices and discussing possible solutions with manufacturers. Korea supports step-by-step approach. China supports consideration and promises to support. 12065 2621 6 Mar 2024 Show Edit Destroy

New Notation