UN R134 | 00 series of amendments
(2015)
WP.29/2014/78: Transposition of the HFCV GTR into a UN Regulation with the exception of the deletion of references to liquefied hydrogen.
|
|
Discussion from 164th WP.29 session (11-14
Nov 2014)
|
71(bis). The representative of OICA supported the adoption of the new draft UN Regulation on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles as submitted to WP.29 and AC.1. He pointed out that this draft also contains post-crash requirements, because it fully transposes UN GTR No. 13 into the 1958 Agreement framework. He added that the normal procedure would have been to insert these provisions in the relevant UN Regulations on frontal and lateral collision, such as UN Regulations Nos. 94 or 95, similar to the approach used for UN Regulation No. 100 (Safety of battery electric vehicles). Therefore, he suggested that GRSP should revise, in a further step, the UN Regulation focusing on safety requirements for the construction and use of HFCV vehicles, while the post-crash requirements would be transferred to the relevant post-crash Regulations under the 1958 Agreement. WP.29 endorsed this approach.
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Corrigendum 1
(GR amended and approved)
GRSP-74-12: Proposal from the task force on the Transposition of GTR 13 Phase 2 amendments into UN R134.
|
|
Discussion from 74th GRSP session (4-8
Dec 2023)
|
28. The expert of the Task Force to transpose Amendment 1 of UN GTR No. 13 into UN Regulation No. 134 introduced GRSP-74-12, correcting UN Regulation No. 134 (Hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles). GRSP adopted GRSP-74-12, as reproduced by annex VII to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposal as corrigendum 1 to the original version of UN Regulation No. 134 for consideration and vote to the June 2024 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.
|
|
0
|
|
1
|
|
UN R134 | 00 series of amendments | Supplement 1
(2016)
WP.29/2015/53: Proposal to include “MFP” in the labeling requirement for hydrogen containers. MFP refers to the maximum allowable container pressure under normal use.
|
|
|
0
|
1
|
|
|
UN R134 | 00 series of amendments | Supplement 2
(2017)
WP.29/2016/39: Proposal to correct a reference in UN R134, Annex 3, paragraph 3.4. The reference to paragraph 6.2.2.2. was transposed from GTR No. 13; however, it ostensibly refers paragraph 2.2 of Annex 3 in UN R134. With 40 of the 51 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2016/39 by a vote of 40 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
0
|
2
|
|
|
UN R134 | 00 series of amendments | Supplement 3
(2018)
WP.29/2017/127: Proposal to- align the regulation with legislation of the European Union, United States of America, and Japan,
- clarify the test procedure, including ambient temperature provisions,
- reduce unnecessary time and cost demands of the COP test procedures,
- apply the minimum burst pressure BPmin as the pressure limit in the hydrostatic pressure rupture test for COP batch testing, and
- delete the phrase "and in no case less than the value necessary to meet the stress ratio requirements" erroneously introduced into paragraph 9.3.2.1.
With 38 of the 53 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2017/127 by a vote of 38 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
0
|
3
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 4
(Adopted)
WP.29/2021/123: Proposal from GRSP to to allow alternative test methods for heavy duty vehicles in order to improve applicability of the requirements to vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3.. With 40 of the 56 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2021/123 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 3 abstaining.
|
|
|
0
|
4
|
|
|
00 series of amendments
| Supplement 5
(Adopted)
WP.29/2023/52: Proposal to clarify the procedure and the characteristics of the measuring device used for the compliance test of the vehicle exhaust system. With 35 of the 58 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2023/52 by a vote of 35 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
0
|
5
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
(Adopted)
WP.29/2021/65: Proposal to align UN R134 with UN R67 and UN R110 with regard to labelling requirements and to assist emergency services in determining appropriate responses in case of fire. With 40 of the 56 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2021/65 by a vote of 38 in favor, 0 opposed, with 2 abstaining.
|
|
Discussion from 184th WP.29 session (22-24
Jun 2021)
|
95. The Chair of GRSP presented draft amendment proposals contained in document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2021/65 under agenda item 4.6.4., to amend UN Regulation No. 134.
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 1
(Adopted)
WP.29/2021/124: Proposal from GRSP to allow alternative test methods for heavy duty vehicles in order to improve applicability of the requirements to vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2 and N3. With 40 of the 56 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2021/124 by a vote of 37 in favor, 0 opposed, with 3 abstaining.
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
01 series of amendments
| Supplement 2
(Adopted)
WP.29/2023/53: Proposal to clarify the procedure and the characteristics of the measuring device used for the compliance test of the vehicle exhaust system. With 35 of the 58 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2023/53 by a vote of 35 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
|
02 series of amendments
(Adopted)
WP.29/2023/110: Proposal to transpose Amendment 1 to UN GTR13, Phase 2 (GTR13-PH2) into UN R134. With 39 of the 58 Contracting Parties applying UN R134 present and voting, AC.1 adopted document WP.29/2023/110 by a vote of 39 in favor, 0 opposed, with 0 abstaining.
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|