| Proposal for 08 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 14 | |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2017/128 | |
|
Proposal to transfer all ISOFIX requirements from UN R14 into a new UN Regulation. Within the context of the international whole vehicle type approval program, the removal of these CRS anchorage provisions would align UN R14 with its Australian Design Rule counterpart and enable Australia to apply the revised UN R14 narrowed down to adult seat-belt anchorages only. |
|
| Meeting Sessions: 173rd WP.29 session (14-17 Nov 2017) | |
| Document date: 23 Aug 17 | |
| Document status: Adopted text published | |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 14 | Safety-Belt and ISOFIX Anchorages and UN Regulation No. 145 | ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions | |
| Adoption Vote | |
| This proposal (WP.29/2017/128) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-five Contracting Parties out of the 47 applying UN R14 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-five voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining. | |
| Click here to view the full document file | |
| Proposal for a new UN Regulation No. XXX on ISOFIX anchorage systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions | |
| Reference Number: WP.29/2017/133 | |
|
Proposal to consolidate provisions concerning ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions removed from Regulation No. 14 in a new regulation. This change removes obstacles to the inclusion of UN R14 into Annex 4 of the future UN Regulation No. 0 of the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA). |
|
| Meeting Sessions: 173rd WP.29 session (14-17 Nov 2017) | |
| Document date: 24 Aug 17 | |
| Document status: Adopted text published | |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 145 | ISOFIX anchorages systems, ISOFIX top tether anchorages and i-Size seating positions | |
| Adoption Vote | |
| This proposal (WP.29/2017/133) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-eight Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-seven voted in favor with zero against and one abstaining. | |
| Click here to view the full document file | |
No matching documents.