21. Recalling the discussion at the previous session of GRPE, the Chairman of the informal group on Worldwide harmonized Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC) introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 proposing to introduce limit values into gtr No. 2. He reported that the discussions on the proposal were still ongoing on the following three issues:
(i) final set of limit values,
(ii) reference fuel and
(iii) durability requirements.

He announced his intention to hold a further meeting in Brussels on 13-14 September 2010 to resolve the remaining open issues. He expected to submit the final proposal to GRPE for consideration at its next session.

22. The expert from IMMA raised concerns (GRPE-60-04) and suggested improving the text of ECE/TRANS/WP.2/GRPE/2010/10. The expert from Japan proposed to amend the provisions in part 1 (preamble) regarding reference fuel (GRPE-60-14). The expert from the United States of America presented GRPE-60-07 proposing a number of improvements and clarifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10. The experts from India and Canada supported these comments. GRPE agreed to refer these informal documents to the WMTC informal group for a detailed consideration.

23. The GRPE Chairman expressed his intention to inform WP.29 and AC.3 in June 2010 about the status and he recommended having a final review of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 at the next session of GRPE in January 2011.

21. Recalling the discussion at the previous session of GRPE, the Chairman of the informal group on Worldwide harmonized Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC) introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 proposing to introduce limit values into gtr No. 2. He reported that the discussions on the proposal were still ongoing on the following three issues:
(i) final set of limit values,
(ii) reference fuel and
(iii) durability requirements.

He announced his intention to hold a further meeting in Brussels on 13-14 September 2010 to resolve the remaining open issues. He expected to submit the final proposal to GRPE for consideration at its next session.

22. The expert from IMMA raised concerns (GRPE-60-04) and suggested improving the text of ECE/TRANS/WP.2/GRPE/2010/10. The expert from Japan proposed to amend the provisions in part 1 (preamble) regarding reference fuel (GRPE-60-14). The expert from the United States of America presented GRPE-60-07 proposing a number of improvements and clarifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10. The experts from India and Canada supported these comments. GRPE agreed to refer these informal documents to the WMTC informal group for a detailed consideration.

23. The GRPE Chairman expressed his intention to inform WP.29 and AC.3 in June 2010 about the status and he recommended having a final review of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 at the next session of GRPE in January 2011.

21. Recalling the discussion at the previous session of GRPE, the Chairman of the informal group on Worldwide harmonized Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC) introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 proposing to introduce limit values into gtr No. 2. He reported that the discussions on the proposal were still ongoing on the following three issues:
(i) final set of limit values,
(ii) reference fuel and
(iii) durability requirements.

He announced his intention to hold a further meeting in Brussels on 13-14 September 2010 to resolve the remaining open issues. He expected to submit the final proposal to GRPE for consideration at its next session.

22. The expert from IMMA raised concerns (GRPE-60-04) and suggested improving the text of ECE/TRANS/WP.2/GRPE/2010/10. The expert from Japan proposed to amend the provisions in part 1 (preamble) regarding reference fuel (GRPE-60-14). The expert from the United States of America presented GRPE-60-07 proposing a number of improvements and clarifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10. The experts from India and Canada supported these comments. GRPE agreed to refer these informal documents to the WMTC informal group for a detailed consideration.

23. The GRPE Chairman expressed his intention to inform WP.29 and AC.3 in June 2010 about the status and he recommended having a final review of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 at the next session of GRPE in January 2011.

21. Recalling the discussion at the previous session of GRPE, the Chairman of the informal group on Worldwide harmonized Motorcycle emission Test Cycle (WMTC) introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 proposing to introduce limit values into gtr No. 2. He reported that the discussions on the proposal were still ongoing on the following three issues:
(i) final set of limit values,
(ii) reference fuel and
(iii) durability requirements.

He announced his intention to hold a further meeting in Brussels on 13-14 September 2010 to resolve the remaining open issues. He expected to submit the final proposal to GRPE for consideration at its next session.

22. The expert from IMMA raised concerns (GRPE-60-04) and suggested improving the text of ECE/TRANS/WP.2/GRPE/2010/10. The expert from Japan proposed to amend the provisions in part 1 (preamble) regarding reference fuel (GRPE-60-14). The expert from the United States of America presented GRPE-60-07 proposing a number of improvements and clarifications to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10. The experts from India and Canada supported these comments. GRPE agreed to refer these informal documents to the WMTC informal group for a detailed consideration.

23. The GRPE Chairman expressed his intention to inform WP.29 and AC.3 in June 2010 about the status and he recommended having a final review of ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRPE/2010/10 at the next session of GRPE in January 2011.