EMC
Background:

• simply referring to UN R10, or including all necessary requirements into the regulation
• not all UN R10 requirements are necessary for AECD/AECS

Climate resistance
Background:

• Need to ensure proper resistance to climate extremes in order to guarantee emission of e-call in all circumstances. Item of particular importance in RUS
• Resistance to climate usually not defined in other regulations, except UN R97, R116 and few others. Industry and J consider this as “over-regulation”.
• Resistance to climate currently well addressed by the market in the frame of product liability.

Mechanical resistance
Background:

• Need to ensure proper resistance to mechanical aggressions in order to guarantee emission of e-call in all circumstances
• OICA concerned that the proposed requirements could be detrimental to safety as the manufacturers usually adapt the specifications to the vehicle.

AECS triggering conditions (UN R94/R95 environment)
Background:

• Question on whether UN R94/95 are relevant for assessing AECD/AECS resistance to crash
  • Worst case configuration
  • AECD/AECS post-crash functionality assessment
• Proposal to perform a separate AECD sled test

• Status of discussions at GRSG-AECS informal group:
  • Verification (in minimum) of generation of trigger signal during the UN R94/95 impacts,
  • audio capabilities and MSD transmission during crash test procedure.
• This can also be done via other measures.

Navigation module requirements
Background:

• Question on whether the regulation should mandate GNSS for achieving accuracy in positioning (design restriction vs. technical necessity)
• European Commission keen that all AECD/AECS are Galileo compatible