Working Party on Passive Safety
← GRSP 78
GRSP 80 →
1-5 Jun  · Geneva
Agenda All Documents Formal Informal Report
Originally scheduled for 18-22 May.
GRSP/79 Passive Safety: Report of the 79th (June 2026) session
UNECE: .pdf | .docx GAR: .pdf | .docx
← Agenda Item 10. Agenda Item 12. →
11. UN Regulation No. 100 (Electric power trained vehicles)

19. The expert from OICA presented plans to streamline UN Regulation No. 100 by removing 11 tests and requirements (informal documents GRSP-79-13-Rev.1 and GRSP-79-14). He argued that their analyses and the lack of incidents with the current rules showed that these requirements were redundant and that removing them would not decrease the level of safety. Several experts were sympathetic with the objective of streamlining UN Regulation No. 100 but where not in a position to agree to such sweeping changes in the timeframe suggested by OICA. Some experts further argued that the lack of incidents was not proof that the current requirements were redundant, but rather that they were effective. Answering a question, the expert from OICA clarified that these changes were only proposed for the UN Regulation, and not for UN GTR No. 20. GRSP advised that the matter be analysed to ensure that both regulations remained harmonized. The expert from OICA requested that as a first step, experts send him their feedback in writing.

20. The expert from OICA also presented a draft proposal for a guidance document to aid in the practical interpretation of the concept of “type of rechargeable electrical energy storage system (REESS)”, as defined in paragraph 2.48. of UN Regulation No. 100 (informal documents GRSP-79-13-Rev.1 and GRSP-79-15). This document was not intended to modify existing requirements and would not be part of the UN Regulation, but would be hosted in the ECE website. He mentioned the existence of similar guidance documents in other areas under the umbrella of WP.29. The expert from Italy expressed support for the idea. The expert from the Kingdom of the Netherlands was of the opinion that it might be convenient to revisit the drafting of paragraph 2.48. and said that he would send his written feedback to the expert from OICA.

21. The expert from OICA announced his intention to submit two working documents to the next session based on informal documents GRSP-79-14 and GRSP-79-15 and the feedback received.