| Tyre abrasion: Proposal for a list of test facilities deemed equivalent under para. 12.8. |
| Reference Number: GRBP-83-50/Rev.1 |
|
Proposal to establish a list of test facilities deemed equivalent pursuant to paragraph 12.8 of the draft UN Regulation on tyre abrasion. The list recognizes six foundational facilities that participated in the initial inter-facility campaign to develop abrasion limits for C1 tyres. The facilities are: DEKRA Test Center SA (France, circuit); IFV (Germany, circuit); Link Engineering Company GmbH (Germany, circuit); Bridgestone Corporation (Japan, indoor drum); Sumitomo Rubber Industries, LTD. (Japan, indoor drum); and The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. (Japan, indoor drum). These facilities generated foundational data used to define abrasion limits and are deemed equivalent for equivalence procedures under Annex 4. |
| Submitted by: EC |
| Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRBP session (10-13 Feb) |
| Document date: 10 Feb 26 |
| Document status: Formal GR review |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Tyre abrasion task force status report (Part II) |
| Reference Number: GRBP-83-51/Rev.1 |
|
This status report documents the Tyre Abrasion Task Force’s progress toward finalizing a draft UN Regulation on tyre abrasion for C1 tyres, as presented to GRBP 83 Part II. The task force pursued three workstreams: data analysis to reduce method uncertainty and inversion risk, editorial improvements to increase clarity of the draft regulation, and development of a method equivalence solution. GRBP 83 Part I achieved consensus on limit values and introductory dates but could not reach consensus on equivalence procedures between convoy and drum methods. Six informal documents (GRBP-83-32-Rev.1, GRBP-83-48-Rev.1, GRBP-83-49, GRBP-83-50-Rev.1, GRBP-83-53, and GRBP-83-55) addressing equivalence methodology, drum specifications, and code of practice frequency were submitted for potential adoption at the extraordinary GRBP 83 Part II session. |
| Submitted by: TA |
| Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRBP session (10-13 Feb) |
| Document date: 12 Feb 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Tyre abrasion: Comments on compromise proposal for Annex 4 |
| Reference Number: GRBP-83-52 |
|
ETRTO comments on EC/JRC compromise proposal for Annex 4 tyre abrasion. ETRTO proposes an ALI range minimum of 0.5 as feasible and consistent with statistical distribution in MA results, rejecting the 0.7 range as unrealistic. For Generic Transfer Function gain, ETRTO recommends retaining a = 1.38 rather than the revised a = 1.45, to minimize rejection of good vehicle test results. ETRTO requests TFTA ToR amendment to confirm these conditions by February 2027 based on TA-45-9. |
| Submitted by: ETRTO |
| Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRBP session (10-13 Feb) |
| Document date: 16 Mar 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Tyre abrasion: Proposal to amend GRBP-83-32/Rev.1 |
| Reference Number: GRBP-83-53 |
|
Proposal to amend document GRBP-83-32-Rev.1. Paragraph 1.2.9. amended to exclude special use Professional off-road tyres from scope. Paragraph 2.51. amended to read that the authority which has granted type approval may verify conformity control methods, with normal minimum frequency of verifications at least once every three years. Justification states special use tyres should be excluded as no limits will be established for them, and the three-year frequency aligns with Schedule 1 of the 1958 Agreement. |
| Submitted by: ETRTO |
| Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRBP session (10-13 Feb) |
| Document date: 13 Feb 26 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Tyre abrasion: Position on the draft UN Regulation |
| Reference Number: GRBP-83-54 |
|
JATMA submitted this position on the draft UN Regulation for tyre abrasion at GRBP-83-54. JATMA requests adoption of the indoor drum test method under conditions equivalent to the vehicle test method for type approval. JATMA proposes that the Generic transfer function coefficient should be 1.14, calculated excluding tyre code 127 which exhibits significant variation. JATMA also proposes that the abrasion index range for tyres used in the Annex 4 procedure should be set between 0.4 and 0.5, and that no restrictions should be imposed on baseline test facilities when applying the Specific Transfer Function. |
| Submitted by: JATMA |
| Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRBP session (10-13 Feb) |
| Document date: 12 Feb 26 |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
| Tyre abrasion: Proposal to amend document GRBP-83-49 |
| Reference Number: GRBP-83-55/Rev.1 |
|
Proposal to amend document GRBP-83-32-Rev.1 to renumber Paragraph 6.1. as 6.1.1., renumber current Paragraph 6.1.1. as 6.1.2., introduce new paragraph 1.4. to Annex 3 Introduction, amend paragraph 2.8. with detailed abrasion index and level calculation equations, renumber items in Appendix 2, delete item 1.3. from Appendix 2, and amend item 1.3. in Appendix 6 to clarify transfer function applicability between circuit and drum test facilities. |
| Submitted by: ETRTO |
| Meeting Sessions: 83rd GRBP session (10-13 Feb) |
| Document date: 13 Feb 26 |
| Document status: Superseded |
| Relevant to: UN Regulation No. 186 | Tyre abrasion |
| Click here to view the full document file |
No matching documents.