In accordance with Chapter III, Rule 7 of the Rules of Procedure (TRANS/WP.29/690/Rev.1) of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), the first item on the provisional agenda is the adoption of the agenda.

GRSP agreed to resume discussion on the worst cases of high-injury risk for all possible scenarios due, for example, to different heights of the vehicle from adjustable suspension systems (GRSP-65-17), as a follow-up of consideration of the Executive Committee of the 1998 Agreement.

GRSP will resume consideration of an amendment proposal to incorporate provisions for active deployable systems in the bonnet area from the Informal Working Group on Deployable Pedestrian Protection Systems (IWG-DPPS).

GRSP will resume discussion on Phase 2 of the UN GTR, based on the latest results of IWG work.

GRSP agreed to resume discussion on Phase 2 of the UN GTR and on the work progress of the IWG on Electric Vehicle Safety Phase 2 (EVS PH2).

GRSP agreed to start discussion based on a possible proposal tabled by the expert from the Netherlands to introduce requirements concerning post-crash electrical safety in the event of a frontal collision, as was agreed for UN Regulation No. 94.

GRSP also agreed to resume consideration of a proposal of a supplement tabled by the expert from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA) (GRSP-66-14), aimed at introducing an alternative (at the choice of the manufacturer) to the airbag switch-off for frontal airbags in combination with rearward-facing child restraint systems in the rear seat. GRSP also agreed to resume consideration of a proposal from the expert from Finland, suggesting discussions on the possibility to have three-point safety-belts in M2 and M3 categories of vehicles (GRSP-66-08).

GRSP might wish to resume consideration of a revised proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/12) tabled by the expert from OICA to clarify the test procedure for the height of head restraints in the case of vehicles having a low roof construction.

GRSP agreed to consider a proposal of amendments tabled by the expert from Israel addressing the need to not create trade barriers for the aftermarket accessories, that are currently being used by the riders, until specific requirements for the homologation of accessories, independent from the helmets would be defined (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/19). GRSP also agreed to resume discussion of this agenda item based on a proposal for a monitoring solution, if available. Moreover, GRSP agreed to consider research results from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to IWG once NHTSA had resumed its activities.

GRSP agreed to resume discussion on the belt-guide, that was type approved by the authority of Poland, based on : (a) the research test results on the belt-guide, which would be made available by the expert from European Commission (EC) and (b) the follow-up discussion at the November 2020 session of WP.29.

GRSP may wish to consider a proposal of amendments by the experts from OICA to clarify the transitional provisions of the 05 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 95 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/13).

GRSP may wish to consider additional proposals concerning UN R95.

GRSP may wish to resume discussion on the basis of a possible, revised proposal from the experts of Germany, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of OICA which clarifies different interpretations of vehicle configuration testing in the presence of active suspensions. GRSP also agreed to resume consideration of a possible revised proposal prepared by the experts of the drafting task force to align the UN Regulation with the provisions of the revised General Safety Regulation of the European Union with appropriate transitional provisions, and to make minor adaptations and clarifications to the existing requirements.

GRSP agreed to resume consideration on a proposal for limit values on the chest vertical acceleration of Q-dummies during the dynamic testing of Enhanced Child Restraint Systems (ECRS) tabled by the expert from Japan (GRSP-66-28). GRSP may also wish to consider three proposals prepared by the expert from the European Association of Automotive Suppliers: (a) to provide instructions to consumers in a digital form (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/15), (b) on the test report template and dimension assessment method (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/16) and (c) to clarify that specific vehicle belted ECRS may be fitted with a support leg, top tether and lower tether attachments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/18).

GRSP may wish to consider additional proposals regarding UN R129.

GRSP agreed to resume discussion on a revised proposal tabled by the expert from the Netherlands in cooperation with the expert from EC and OICA (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/17) aimed to identify hydrogen-fuelled buses which were consistent with the existing regulated identification for Liquid Petroleum Gas, Compressed Natural Gas and Liquid Natural Gas fuelled buses.

GRSP agreed to start discussion based on a possible proposal tabled by the expert from the Netherlands to introduce requirements concerning post-crash electrical safety in the event of a frontal collision, as was agreed for UN Regulation No. 94.

GRSP might wish to consider a proposal tabled by the expert from OICA aimed at clarifying the transitional provisions of the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No.137 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2020/14). GRSP may also wish to resume discussion on the inclusion of the L7 category of vehicles into the scope of the UN Regulation.

GRSP will resume discussion of proposals to include dummy specifications and drawings (e.g. Q dummies) into M.R.1.

GRSP may wish to discuss test dummy specifications and female occupant protection.

GRSP will resume discussion on how to secure children in buses, based on the progress of IWG on this subject.

GRSP may wish to be informed about the recent session of WP.29 on vehicle automation. Moreover, GRSP agreed to start discussion on which areas under its responsibility should be revised by developing vehicle automation, based on a document tabled by the expert from Germany and other concerned parties, if available.

GRSP may wish to be informed about the outcome of the future strategy of the Inland Transport Committee.

GRSP may wish to revise the list of priorities of GRSP (GRSP-67-06-Rev.1) as a follow-up to the discussion at the November 2020 session of WP.29.

Rule 37 of the Rules of Procedure (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/690/Rev.1) states that GRSP will elect the Chair and Vice-Chair of the sessions scheduled for the year 2021.

GRSP may wish to exchange information.

GRSP may wish to be informed by the International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA) Ambassador about the outcome of the recent meetings of IWG on IWVTA, the follow-up of the horizontal issue of the new provisions on numbering UN type approvals in accordance with Schedule 4, and the existing format of the communication form which affects all UN Regulations annexed to the 1958 Agreement.

GRSP will be briefed by the secretariat about the highlights of the noted session of WP.29 on GRSP and other common issues.

GRSP may wish to consider the draft terms of references and the IWG work progress in harmonizing the provisions.

GRSP may resume discussion of ITS.

GRSP may wish to resume consideration of this subject based on exchanges of information and national initiatives.

GRSP may wish to consider a proposal to clarify the requirements for the location of ISOFIX systems in case the vehicle type is equipped with rearward facing seats.

GRSP may wish to consider submissions regarding UN R136.