GRVA-02-01
|
GRVA: Running order of the agenda for the 2nd session
Document Title: GRVA: Running order of the agenda for the 2nd session
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-01
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 24 Dec 18 (Posted 26 Dec 18)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
2. GRVA considered the provisional agenda prepared for this first session and adopted it (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/1 and Add.1). The adopted agenda is reproduced in GRVA-02-15-Rev.1, including all informal documents received until the session’s starting date. GRVA also agreed on the running order for the session as proposed in GRVA-02-01. The informal documents distributed during the session are listed in Annex I of the session report.
|
|
26 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
|
|
GRVA-02-0001
|
GRVA-02-02
|
AEBS: Proposal for amendments to document GRVA/2019/5
|
09 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Proposal of amendments from the AEBS informal group to their original submission for a new UN Regulation.
|
GRVA-02-0002
|
GRVA-02-03
|
Status report of the Cybersecurity and Software Updates Task Force
Document Title: Status report of the Cybersecurity and Software Updates Task Force
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-03
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 08 Jan 19 (Posted 09 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management, WP.29 Regulatory Project | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements, and UN Regulation No. 156 | Software Update Processes and Management Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
|
09 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
|
|
GRVA-02-0003
|
GRVA-02-04
|
ISO 16206-1: Requirements for passenger vehicle rear-end targets
(ISO)
|
09 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Password protected .zip file of the ISO standard provided to GRVA for limited use. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.
|
GRVA-02-0004
|
GRVA-02-05
|
ISO 19206-2: Requirements for pedestrian targets
(ISO)
|
09 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Password protected .zip file of the standard for limited GRVA use. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.
|
GRVA-02-0005
|
GRVA-02-06
|
ISO 19206-3: Requirements for passenger vehicle 3D targets
(ISO)
|
09 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Password-protected .zip file of the standard for limited GRVA use. Please contact the GRVA secretariat for access.
|
GRVA-02-0006
|
GRVA-02-07
|
GTR 3: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2018/9
(Italy)
Document Title: GTR 3: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2018/9
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-07
|
Description: Refinements to the proposal to align the GTR text with updates to UN R78 introduced in response to technological progress in motorcycle braking.
|
Submitted by: Italy
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 14 Jan 19 (Posted 16 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns GTR No. 3 | Motorcycle Brake Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
54. The expert from Italy introduced GRVA-02-07 proposing amendments to the original proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9) for amendments to UN GTR No. 3 for harmonization of the GTR and UN Regulation No. 78. The proposal received some comments. The expert from the Netherlands asked why the proposal contained technical requirements that differed from those in UN Regulation No. 78. The expert from Canada highlighted some formulations that could be better defined to facilitate the implementation of the UN GTR into Self Certification regulations.
|
|
16 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Motorcycle Brake Systems
Motorcycle Brakes
Global Technical Regulation No. 3: Motorcycle Brake Systems
|
Refinements to the proposal to align the GTR text with updates to UN R78 introduced in response to technological progress in motorcycle braking.
|
GRVA-02-0007
|
GRVA-02-08
|
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/8 (RCM)
(UK)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/8 (RCM)
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-08
|
Description: Proposal to - correct numbering of paragraph 2.3.4.18.
- limit the initial scope to M1 and N1 vehicles
- further modify the numbering to clarify that remote-controlled maneuvering (RCM) is not a form of ACSF
- clarify that all RCM are subject to the requirements of the Electronics Annex (Annex 6 to UN R79).
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 14 Jan 19 (Posted 16 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
56. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/8 and
GRVA-02-08 amending it, proposing to insert technical prescriptions on Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) which were systems that were already installed on vehicles without being regulated to date. The expert from Germany did not support the proposal and suggested to insert one sentence in the Regulation that would forbid RCM in vehicles of category M1 and N1. The expert from OICA explained that such system already existed for vehicles of category M1G and that there would be future applications such as reverse assistant for trailers that would bring quantifiable benefits in terms of safety. Following comments and input from the experts from Australia, France and Sweden, the Chair asked GRVA whether the status quo would be acceptable, i.e. do Contracting Parties accept that such systems are permitted and do not require recognition by Regulation. The expert from the Russian Federation summed-up the discussion and suggested to adopt the proposal. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (Annex VII). GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their November 2019 session. GRVA unanimously agreed with this delayed submission until the November 2019, so that the dissent from the experts from Germany and the Netherlands could be considered again during the September 2019 session of GRVA, in view of reaching a broader consensus.
|
|
16 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal to<ol class="alpha"><li>correct numbering of paragraph 2.3.4.18.</li><li>limit the initial scope to M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles</li><li>further modify the numbering to clarify that remote-controlled maneuvering (RCM) is <u>not</u> a form of ACSF</li><li>clarify that all RCM are subject to the requirements of the Electronics Annex (Annex 6 to UN R79).</li></ol>
|
GRVA-02-0008
|
GRVA-02-09
|
Future Certification of Automated/Autonomous Driving Systems
(OICA)
|
16 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
|
Presentation on current OICA thinking on methodologies for the certification or approval of automated vehicles and automated driving systems. This presentation supports document GRVA/2019/13.
|
GRVA-02-0009
|
GRVA-02-10
|
UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement to the 11 series of amendments
(Russia)
Document Title: UN R13: Proposal for a Supplement to the 11 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-10
|
Description: Proposal to clarify the test method for the evaluation of performance of energy sources and energy storage devices reproduced in Annex 7 to the UN Regulation No. 13.
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 23 Jan 19 (Posted 24 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 13 | Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
51. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced GRVA-02-10, aimed at clarifying the provisions on the evaluation of the energy source and energy storage devices performance defined in Annex 7 to UN Regulation No. 13. GRVA discussed in detail the proposal and requested the secretariat to distribute this document with an official symbol for the September 2019 session of GRVA.
|
|
24 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Heavy-Duty Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles of Categories M, N and O with regard to Braking
|
Proposal to clarify the test method for the evaluation of performance of energy sources and energy storage devices reproduced in Annex 7 to the UN Regulation No. 13.
|
GRVA-02-0010
|
GRVA-02-11
|
New validation approaches for automated driving safety
(France)
|
24 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
GRVA-02-0011
|
GRVA-02-12
|
GRVA-2: Highlights of the 176th WP.29 session and general information
Document Title: GRVA-2: Highlights of the 176th WP.29 session and general information
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-12
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 23 Jan 19 (Posted 24 Jan 19)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
3. The Secretary introduced GRVA-02-12, informing on the highlights of the November 2018 session of WP.29. He referred to the session report ECE/TRANS/WP.29/1142 for further details.
4. The Secretary of WP.29 invited the GRVA delegates to participate in the Global Forum for Road Traffic Safety (WP.1) and WP.29 event during the week of the eighty-first session of the Inland Transport Committee (ITC) and presented the programme of the ITC week.
|
|
24 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
|
|
GRVA-02-0012
|
GRVA-02-13
|
Status report of the [VMAD] informal group
Document Title: Status report of the [VMAD] informal group
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-13
|
Description: Status report on the consideration of new methods for the assessment of automated driving systems (pending approval of the terms of reference for a group on Validation Methods for Automated Driving).
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 24 Jan 19 (Posted 24 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
13. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Automated Vehicle Testing, introduced the status report (GRVA-02-13) of the group, reporting the outcome of the meetings in Japan and China. The group decided to propose new ToR (see GRVA-02-14) for the group, renamed “Validation Method of Automated Driving (VMAD)”. He presented GRVA-02-16, providing clarity on the proposed activities of the group in the form of questions and answers. He also presented GRVA-02-26 with a proposed roadmap for the group. GRVA heard concerns about the proposed ToR, in particular it was felt that more precision was required regarding the objectives and the timeline for delivery. GRVA did not adopt the proposed ToR.
|
|
24 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Status report on the consideration of new methods for the assessment of automated driving systems (pending approval of the terms of reference for a group on Validation Methods for Automated Driving).
|
GRVA-02-0013
|
GRVA-02-14
|
Proposal for Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedures for the IWG on VMAD
Document Title: Proposal for Terms of Reference and Rules of Procedures for the IWG on VMAD
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-14
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 24 Jan 19 (Posted 24 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
13. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Automated Vehicle Testing, introduced the status report (GRVA-02-13) of the group, reporting the outcome of the meetings in Japan and China. The group decided to propose new ToR (see GRVA-02-14) for the group, renamed “Validation Method of Automated Driving (VMAD)”. He presented GRVA-02-16, providing clarity on the proposed activities of the group in the form of questions and answers. He also presented GRVA-02-26 with a proposed roadmap for the group. GRVA heard concerns about the proposed ToR, in particular it was felt that more precision was required regarding the objectives and the timeline for delivery. GRVA did not adopt the proposed ToR.
|
|
24 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
GRVA-02-0014
|
GRVA-02-15/Rev.1
|
GRVA-2: Updated and consolidated provisional agenda
Document Title: GRVA-2: Updated and consolidated provisional agenda
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-15/Rev.1
|
Description: Including submissions received through 23 January.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
2. GRVA considered the provisional agenda prepared for this first session and adopted it (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/1 and Add.1). The adopted agenda is reproduced in GRVA-02-15-Rev.1, including all informal documents received until the session’s starting date. GRVA also agreed on the running order for the session as proposed in GRVA-02-01. The informal documents distributed during the session are listed in Annex I of the session report.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
|
Including submissions received through 23 January.
|
GRVA-02-0015/Rev.1
|
GRVA-02-16
|
Explanation on VMAD: Questions and answers
Document Title: Explanation on VMAD: Questions and answers
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-16
|
Description: Explanation of the scope of the proposed informal working group on Validation Methods for Automated Driving (VMAD), including relation to other informal working groups such as ACSF.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
13. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Automated Vehicle Testing, introduced the status report (GRVA-02-13) of the group, reporting the outcome of the meetings in Japan and China. The group decided to propose new ToR (see GRVA-02-14) for the group, renamed “Validation Method of Automated Driving (VMAD)”. He presented GRVA-02-16, providing clarity on the proposed activities of the group in the form of questions and answers. He also presented GRVA-02-26 with a proposed roadmap for the group. GRVA heard concerns about the proposed ToR, in particular it was felt that more precision was required regarding the objectives and the timeline for delivery. GRVA did not adopt the proposed ToR.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Explanation of the scope of the proposed informal working group on Validation Methods for Automated Driving (VMAD), including relation to other informal working groups such as ACSF.
|
GRVA-02-0016
|
GRVA-02-17
|
Reference guidelines for automated driving vehicles
Document Title: Reference guidelines for automated driving vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-17
|
Description: Broad comparison of AV safety elements under GRVA purview and elements present in AV safety guidance issued by Contracting Parties.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
10. The expert from Japan introduced GRVA-02-17, prepared by the Validation Method of Automated Driving (VMAD) group, providing a consolidated overview of items within Guidelines on ADVs, issued in Australia, Canada, Europe, Japan and USA. He explained that the group was dealing with a novel assessment method, had to look at existing reference documents including Guidelines on ADVs from various Contracting Parties and therefore produced this document. GRVA noted that this work would be very useful for the work under other agenda items.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Broad comparison of AV safety elements under GRVA purview and elements present in AV safety guidance issued by Contracting Parties.
|
GRVA-02-0017
|
GRVA-02-18
|
Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3
(IMMA)
Document Title: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/2 and GRVA/2019/3
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-18
|
Description: Proposal to exclude L-category vehicles (motorcycles, etc.) from the scope of the cybersecurity and software updates activities.
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management, WP.29 Regulatory Project | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements, and UN Regulation No. 156 | Software Update Processes and Management Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
|
Proposal to exclude L-category vehicles (motorcycles, etc.) from the scope of the cybersecurity and software updates activities.
|
GRVA-02-0018
|
GRVA-02-19
|
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/4
(UK)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/4
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-19
|
Description: Proposal to ensure that the safety approach for complex electronics of remote controlled maneuvering addresses malfunctions, non-fault errors, and misuse.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
38. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/4 as amended by GRVA-02-19, proposing clarifications to Annex 6 of UN Regulation No. 79. The expert from OICA stated that the amendments proposed would require too much work for the approval of simple braking systems. He added that these amendments would make sense to properly assess Advanced Driver Assistant Systems (ADAS). The expert from EC stated that this proposal would be suitable as an amendment to UN Regulation No. 79 but would not be enough for the assessment of ALKS and ADAS. The expert from Spain mentioned that the Type Approval Authority signature provisions’ implications were too far-reaching to be mentioned in a footnote. Spain also observed that the proposal placed too much responsibility on the Type Approval Authority to identify risks and stated that the manufacturer should have that responsibility. The expert from the Netherlands explained that this work initially started for the purpose of ACSF of Category B2 defined in UN Regulation No. 79 and that this explained why the document was titled “Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 79”. The expert from UK volunteered to submit a revised proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 79, addressing the comment received. GRVA agreed that similar provisions should be specifically developed for ALKS and systems with higher levels of autonomy. The Chair noted the implications that this would have on the delivery of a regulatory provision for ALKS.
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 3 | 3-4
Jun 2019
51. No information was provided under this agenda item.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal to ensure that the safety approach for complex electronics of remote controlled maneuvering addresses malfunctions, non-fault errors, and misuse.
|
GRVA-02-0019
|
GRVA-02-20
|
Data Storage System for Automated Driving (DSSAD)
(OICA)
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving
DSSAD
Event Data Recorders
EDR
|
|
GRVA-02-0020
|
GRVA-02-21
|
Proposal for a draft Regulation on DSSAD
(OICA)
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving
DSSAD
Event Data Recorders
EDR
|
Initial outline and elements for development into a new UN Regulation for data and event recording systems for L3-5 automated vehicles.
|
GRVA-02-0021
|
GRVA-02-22
|
AEBS: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/5
(OICA)
Document Title: AEBS: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/5
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-22
|
Description: Amendment proposal to the draft text for a new UN Regulation on M1 and N1vehicle automatic emergency braking systems.
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 28 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 152 | Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
46. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-02-22, proposing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/5. GRVA recommended that the proposal be reviewed by the IWG on AEBS and that this proposal would either be included in the submission of the IWG for the September 2019 session or be submitted as a separate proposal for review in September 2019, if no consensus would be reached on this proposal by the IWG on AEBS.
|
|
28 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Amendment proposal to the draft text for a new UN Regulation on M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub>vehicle automatic emergency braking systems.
|
GRVA-02-0022
|
GRVA-02-23
|
UN R140: Proposal for amendments
(CLEPA and OICA)
Document Title: UN R140: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-23
|
Description: This document proposes amendments to the ESC prescribed test conditions in anticipation of future developments in steering systems.
|
Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
48. The expert from OICA, on behalf of OICA and CLEPA, and anticipating the development of future steering systems, introduced GRVA-02-23, proposing amendments to the Electronic Stability Control related test conditions. GRVA questioned the impact on UN Global Technical Regulation (GTR) No. 8. as well as the unintended impact on the compliance with the initial spirit of the Regulation.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Electronic Stability Control Systems
ESC Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars with regard to electronic stability control systems
|
This document proposes amendments to the ESC prescribed test conditions in anticipation of future developments in steering systems.
|
GRVA-02-0023
|
GRVA-02-24
|
UN R79: Proposal for a draft Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
(CLEPA and OICA)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for a draft Supplement to the 03 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-24
|
Description: Proposal for amendments to the requirements for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF) of Category C, introducing specific provisions for the use of a lane change function with a two-step Human Machine Interface (HMI).
|
Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
37. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-02-24 (based on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/2), proposing to insert in the Regulation some provisions for ACSF of Category C with a two-step Human Machine Interface (HMI) approach. The expert from the Netherlands disagreed with the proposed seven seconds as the time during which the second deliberate action by the driver should take place while this time for the one-step HMI approach (latest time by which an automatic initiation should occur), already in force, is limited to five seconds. The expert from France supported the proposal and showed flexibility on the seven seconds value to reach consensus among CPs. The expert from Germany asked whether this proposal would allow one single vehicle to be equipped with both a one-step HMI and a two-step HMI and how the combination of both would work. GRVA invited OICA to consider the issues raised by the experts and requested the secretariat to distribute the proposal with an official symbol for review at its September 2019 session.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal for amendments to the requirements for Automatically Commanded Steering Functions (ACSF) of Category C, introducing specific provisions for the use of a lane change function with a two-step Human Machine Interface (HMI).
|
GRVA-02-0024
|
GRVA-02-25
|
UN R13-H: Proposal for a Supplement to the 01 series of amendments
(CLEPA and OICA)
Document Title: UN R13-H: Proposal for a Supplement to the 01 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-25
|
Description: Proposal for amendments to the draft proposal concerning changes to the provisions introduced by the 02 series of amendments for remote-controlled parking (RCP).
|
Submitted by: CLEPA and OICA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 13-H | Light-Duty Vehicle Braking.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
52. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-02-25, proposing clarifications of the requirements regarding the generation of a brake signal to illuminate the stop lamp especially in the context of hybrid electric and battery electric vehicles. The proposal received some comments. GRVA invited the expert from OICA to submit a revised proposal for review at the September 2019 session of GRVA.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Light-Duty Vehicle Braking
Light Vehicle Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Passenger Cars with regard to Braking
|
Proposal for amendments to the draft proposal concerning changes to the provisions introduced by the 02 series of amendments for remote-controlled parking (RCP).
|
GRVA-02-0025
|
GRVA-02-26
|
Roadmap and working schedule for VMAD informal working group
Document Title: Roadmap and working schedule for VMAD informal working group
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-26
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
13. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Automated Vehicle Testing, introduced the status report (GRVA-02-13) of the group, reporting the outcome of the meetings in Japan and China. The group decided to propose new ToR (see GRVA-02-14) for the group, renamed “Validation Method of Automated Driving (VMAD)”. He presented GRVA-02-16, providing clarity on the proposed activities of the group in the form of questions and answers. He also presented GRVA-02-26 with a proposed roadmap for the group. GRVA heard concerns about the proposed ToR, in particular it was felt that more precision was required regarding the objectives and the timeline for delivery. GRVA did not adopt the proposed ToR.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
GRVA-02-0026
|
GRVA-02-27
|
Future Certification of Automated Driving Systems
(OICA)
Document Title: Future Certification of Automated Driving Systems
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-27
|
Description: Updated document to provide information on a “multi-pillar approach” certification scheme to demonstrate the level of safety and reliability which allows for safe market introduction of automated/autonomous vehicles, including refinement via the synthesis of Contracting Party AV guidance to provide a framework for defining specific safety elements.
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 28 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
17. Due to lack of time, GRVA did not consider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/13, describing the principles of the “Three-Pillar Approach”, proposed by the experts from OICA (see GRVA-02-09 and GRVA-02-27).
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Updated document to provide information on a “multi-pillar approach” certification scheme to demonstrate the level of safety and reliability which allows for safe market introduction of automated/autonomous vehicles, including refinement via the synthesis of Contracting Party AV guidance to provide a framework for defining specific safety elements.
|
GRVA-02-0027
|
GRVA-02-28
|
Status report of the AEBS informal working group
Document Title: Status report of the AEBS informal working group
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-28
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 29 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 152 | Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
40. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS presented GRVA-02-28 with a status report on the activities of the group drafting a new UN Regulation with provisions applicable to vehicles of category M1 and N1 and introduced the corresponding proposal in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/5. He presented the key performance requirements defined for so called vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-pedestrians AEBS. He mentioned that some provisions were contained in square brackets indicating that decisions by GRVA were needed, e.g. the provisions for manual AEBS deactivation and the definition of performance requirements for vehicle-to-bicycle systems.
41. GRVA discussed provisions allowing for the manual deactivation of an AEBS. The expert from Australia informed that according to their survey, 93 per cent of respondents answered that they never deactivated their AEBS. GRVA, taking into account the risks in case of a misalignment of sensors, agreed to include provisions allowing manual deactivation on the basis that the provisions in the proposal ensured that the process required more than one action to complete.
42. GRVA reviewed the proposal and agreed with the text as reproduced in GRVA-02-39-Corr.1.
43. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit the proposal as amended in para. 42 as draft UN Regulation on Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M1 and N1 vehicles for consideration and vote by WP.29 and the Administrative Committee AC.1 at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
|
GRVA-02-0028
|
GRVA-02-29
|
UN R139: Agreed amendments to GRVA/2019/12
Document Title: UN R139: Agreed amendments to GRVA/2019/12
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-29
|
Description: Proposal to clarify that UN R139 does not mandate the installation of brake assist systems (BAS) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with a BAS system.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 29 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 139 | Brake Assist Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
50. GRVA considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/12 (together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/6) under agenda item 7 (a) above. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-02-29) and reproduced in Annex V. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 139 (BAS) for consideration and vote at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Brake Assist Systems
Brake Assist Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars with regard to brake assist systems
|
Proposal to clarify that UN R139 does not mandate the installation of brake assist systems (BAS) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with a BAS system.
|
GRVA-02-0029
|
GRVA-02-30
|
UN R140: Agreed amendments to GRVA/2019/6
Document Title: UN R140: Agreed amendments to GRVA/2019/6
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-30
|
Description: Proposal to clarify that UN R140 does not mandate the installation of electronic stability control systems (ESC) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with an ESC system.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 29 Jan 19 (Posted 29 Jan 19)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
47. The expert from Australia introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/6 addressing the concern expressed during the 175th WP.29 session. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-02-30) and reproduced in Annex IV. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 3 to UN Regulation No. 140 for consideration and vote at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
29 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Electronic Stability Control Systems
ESC Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars with regard to electronic stability control systems
|
Proposal to clarify that UN R140 does not mandate the installation of electronic stability control systems (ESC) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with an ESC system.
|
GRVA-02-0030
|
GRVA-02-31
|
GRVA work priorities - Proposal for a Draft Structure
(Germany)
Document Title: GRVA work priorities - Proposal for a Draft Structure
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-31
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 29 Jan 19 (Posted 30 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management, WP.29 Regulatory Project | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements, and UN Regulation No. 156 | Software Update Processes and Management Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
|
30 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
|
|
GRVA-02-0031
|
GRVA-02-32
|
Safety of The Intended Functionality (SOTIF)
(ISO)
|
30 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
<ul><li>Safety aspects of automated driving</li><li>What is the Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF)?</li><li>ISO/PAS 21448 status and activities</li><li>Connection with Automated Driving (AD) regulatory activities</li></ul>
|
GRVA-02-0032
|
GRVA-02-33
|
UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/9
(Germany)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2019/9
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-33
|
Description: Proposal to amend the draft text (GRVA/2019/9) submitted to resolve measurement concerns in the test requirements for ACSF of Category B1 and C by introducing provisions for tolerances, including: - inclusion of the position at which the lateral acceleration was measured and the position of the centre of gravity of the vehicle for better traceablility,
- sampling rate of at least 100 Hz for dynamic testing,
- specification of filters and cut-off frequency for determination of lateral acceleration.
|
Submitted by: Germany
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 29 Jan 19 (Posted 30 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
|
30 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal to amend the draft text (GRVA/2019/9) submitted to resolve measurement concerns in the test requirements for ACSF of Category B1 and C by introducing provisions for tolerances, including:<ol class="alpha"><li>inclusion of the position at which the lateral acceleration was measured and the position of the centre of gravity of the vehicle for better traceablility,</li><li>sampling rate of at least 100 Hz for dynamic testing,</li><li>specification of filters and cut-off frequency for determination of lateral acceleration.</li></ol>
|
GRVA-02-0033
|
GRVA-02-34
|
AEROFLEX - For the next Generation of Long Distance Road Transport
(Spain)
Document Title: AEROFLEX - For the next Generation of Long Distance Road Transport
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-34
|
Description: EU-funded project to develop and demonstrate new technologies, concepts and architectures for complete heavy-duty commercial vehicles and trailers that are energy efficient, safe, comfortable, configurable and cost-effective, while ensuring that the varying needs of customers are satisfied by being flexible and adaptable with respect to the continuously changing operational conditions.
|
Submitted by: Spain
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 29 Jan 19 (Posted 30 Jan 19)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
11. The expert from Spain introduced GRVA-02-34, presenting the Aerodynamic and Flexible Truck for Next Generation of Long Distance Road Transport (AEROFLEX project). GRVA noted that such project could potentially lead to future regulatory activities and agreed that technical barriers should be removed if the safety performance of such systems would be demonstrated.
|
|
30 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
|
EU-funded project to develop and demonstrate new technologies, concepts and architectures for complete heavy-duty commercial vehicles and trailers that are energy efficient, safe, comfortable, configurable and cost-effective, while ensuring that the varying needs of customers are satisfied by being flexible and adaptable with respect to the continuously changing operational conditions.
|
GRVA-02-0034
|
GRVA-02-35
|
Status report of the ACSF informal group
Document Title: Status report of the ACSF informal group
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-35
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 30 Jan 19 (Posted 31 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS) and UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
32. The expert from Japan, on behalf of the Co-chair of the IWG on Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF), introduced GRVA-02-35, containing a status report on the activities of the IWG. He mentioned the consensus reached by the group so far on: Automated Lane Keeping System (ALKS) activation criteria, driver presence provisions, transition demand provisions, minimum risk manoeuvre and emergency manoeuvre considered in parallel with the transition demand provisions. He also mentioned the challenge related to a vehicle not implementing all driver inputs when an ALKS was activated (e.g. in the case of unintended action by the driver), that should be discussed with WP.1. The Chair of GRVA noted that there was a concern that the minimum risk manoeuvre should not automatically result in a vehicle stopping in a live traffic lane.
33. The expert from Spain asked how to verify the activation criteria related to the vehicle driving on roads where pedestrians and cyclists are prohibited at the time of Type Approval. The expert from Germany answered that one technical solution could imply inspecting the maps used by the system.
34. The secretariat asked whether maps would be in the scope of the Regulation. The expert from OICA stated that maps belong to the technical solutions being part of the designs of the system, implying that Regulations on maps would be undesired design requirements. The expert from ITU stated that maps would have to be certified in the future in case maps would serve as redundancy for safety reasons. He also mentioned that maps could have other purposes, e.g. helping Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) to eliminate false positive activations on stationary objects and that therefore map providers would have to be fully liable for their products. He offered to provide GRVA with an overview of map development.
|
|
31 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
|
GRVA-02-0035
|
GRVA-02-36
|
Proposal to revised the ACSF informal group terms of reference
|
31 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Request to extend the ACSF mandate a further 12 months.
|
GRVA-02-0036
|
GRVA-02-37
|
Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2
(EC)
Document Title: Cybersecurity: Comments on document GRVA/2019/2
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-37
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 30 Jan 19 (Posted 31 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
|
31 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
|
GRVA-02-0037
|
GRVA-02-38
|
Software updates: Comments on document GRVA/2019/3
(EC)
Document Title: Software updates: Comments on document GRVA/2019/3
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-38
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 30 Jan 19 (Posted 31 Jan 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
|
31 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
|
|
GRVA-02-0038
|
GRVA-02-39
|
AEBS: Agreed amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/5
|
31 Jan 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Changes to the draft proposal for a new UN Regulation on light vehicle AEBS as noted during the second GRVA session.
|
GRVA-02-0039
|
GRVA-02-39/Corr.1
|
AEBS: Agreed amendments to document GRVA/2019/5
Document Title: AEBS: Agreed amendments to document GRVA/2019/5
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-39/Corr.1
|
Description: Correction to the agreed changes to the draft AEBS regulation for light vehicles as noted by the GRVA secretariat.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019) and 8th AEBS session (8-9
May 2019)
|
Document date: 08 Feb 19 (Posted 11 Feb 19)
|
Document status: Informal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 152 | Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
40. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS presented GRVA-02-28 with a status report on the activities of the group drafting a new UN Regulation with provisions applicable to vehicles of category M1 and N1 and introduced the corresponding proposal in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/5. He presented the key performance requirements defined for so called vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-pedestrians AEBS. He mentioned that some provisions were contained in square brackets indicating that decisions by GRVA were needed, e.g. the provisions for manual AEBS deactivation and the definition of performance requirements for vehicle-to-bicycle systems.
41. GRVA discussed provisions allowing for the manual deactivation of an AEBS. The expert from Australia informed that according to their survey, 93 per cent of respondents answered that they never deactivated their AEBS. GRVA, taking into account the risks in case of a misalignment of sensors, agreed to include provisions allowing manual deactivation on the basis that the provisions in the proposal ensured that the process required more than one action to complete.
42. GRVA reviewed the proposal and agreed with the text as reproduced in GRVA-02-39-Corr.1.
43. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit the proposal as amended in para. 42 as draft UN Regulation on Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M1 and N1 vehicles for consideration and vote by WP.29 and the Administrative Committee AC.1 at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
11 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Correction to the agreed changes to the draft AEBS regulation for light vehicles as noted by the GRVA secretariat.
|
GRVA-02-0039/Corr.1
|
GRVA-02-40
|
Discussion of GRVA priorities
(EC)
Document Title: Discussion of GRVA priorities
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-40
|
Submitted by: EC
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 01 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, WP.29 Regulatory Project | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements, and UN Regulation No. 156 | Software Update Processes and Management Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
|
01 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
|
|
GRVA-02-0040
|
GRVA-02-41
|
Informal Working Group on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles
Document Title: Informal Working Group on Functional Requirements for Automated and Autonomous Vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-41
|
Description: Proposal submitted by the GRVA chair for the scope and objectives of a new informal group.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 01 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
|
01 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Proposal submitted by the GRVA chair for the scope and objectives of a new informal group.
|
GRVA-02-0041
|
GRVA-02-42
|
Proposal for a new GRVA structure based on document WP.29/2019/2
(Japan)
Document Title: Proposal for a new GRVA structure based on document WP.29/2019/2
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-42
|
Submitted by: Japan
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 03 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
|
03 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
GRVA-02-0042
|
GRVA-02-43
|
Preliminary suggestions for the framework document on automated/autonomous driving
(China and Japan)
Document Title: Preliminary suggestions for the framework document on automated/autonomous driving
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-43
|
Submitted by: China and Japan
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 03 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
12. The experts from China and Japan introduced GRVA-02-43 containing preliminary suggestions to the framework document on automated/autonomous driving. GRVA agreed that the workstream on the framework document was strategic and that further work needed to be further discussed in view of March 2019 session of WP.29. Therefore, GRVA requested the Secretary to organize a series of virtual meetings of the Contracting Parties to discuss this matter.
|
|
03 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
|
GRVA-02-0043
|
GRVA-02-44
|
Current allocation of the priorities (in document WP.29/2019/2) to the IWGs of GRVA.
Document Title: Current allocation of the priorities (in document WP.29/2019/2) to the IWGs of GRVA.
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-44
|
Description: Document prepared by the GRVA secretariat pursuant to discussions held during the 2nd GRVA session (originally posted on 3 February and reissued on 21 February 2019).
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 21 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
|
21 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Document prepared by the GRVA secretariat pursuant to discussions held during the 2nd GRVA session (originally posted on 3 February and reissued on 21 February 2019).
|
GRVA-02-0044
|
GRVA-02-45
|
UN R79: Agreed amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/10
Document Title: UN R79: Agreed amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/10
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-45
|
Description: Outcomes from the discussion of the proposal from France to clarify requirements of the optical signal for a CSF intervention to ensure sufficient flashing tell-tale visibility for the driver, to specify the duration of such ACSF signals, to ensure a safe hierarchy of signals (e.g., ESF over CSF) by priority, to clarify that deactivation when departing an ODD means the “off mode”, and to add a cross-reference pointing to paragraphs that define cases of manual and automatic deactivation.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 03 Feb 19)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
|
03 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Outcomes from the discussion of the proposal from France to clarify requirements of the optical signal for a CSF intervention to ensure sufficient flashing tell-tale visibility for the driver, to specify the duration of such ACSF signals, to ensure a safe hierarchy of signals (e.g., ESF over CSF) by priority, to clarify that deactivation when departing an ODD means the “off mode”, and to add a cross-reference pointing to paragraphs that define cases of manual and automatic deactivation.
|
GRVA-02-0045
|
GRVA-02-46
|
Issues identified in connection with the work of the TF on CS/OTA
Document Title: Issues identified in connection with the work of the TF on CS/OTA
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-46
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 31 Jan 19 (Posted 04 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management.
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
|
|
04 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
|
GRVA-02-0046
|
GRVA-02-47
|
GRVA informal working groups - Structure and management proposal
Document Title: GRVA informal working groups - Structure and management proposal
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA-02-47
|
Description: Proposal from the GRVA chair.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 01 Feb 19 (Posted 01 Feb 19)
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems, WP.29 Regulatory Project | Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving, and UN Regulation No. 157 | Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS).
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
5. The Chair introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 proposing priorities related to WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies activities on Automated Driving Vehicles (ADVs).
6. The expert from Japan mentioned that the framework document work stream proposed in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2 should be based on the existing national and regional guidelines to provide the big picture of what GRVA should do. GRVA agreed to make progress on this work stream but noted some minor variations in the precise understanding of what this document should include: a document setting principles and guidelines (compiling existing guidelines) and a document that would also have an operational dimension to guide the future work on ADVs.
7. GRVA also reviewed the other priority items listed in the document and agreed that these priorities proposed can be addressed by GRVA.
8. GRVA discussed the need to address both the activities already started as well as the short-term priorities. Therefore, GRVA discussed the potential structure of GRVA to best address these current activities as well as the new short-term priorities defined in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/2. Several proposals for a new structure were presented
(GRVA-02-31, GRVA-02-40, GRVA-02-42 and GRVA-02-47). The Chair also submitted GRVA-02-41 with draft Terms of Reference (ToR) and Rules of Procedures (RoP) for a new Informal Working Group (IWG).
9. The secretariat drafted at the end of the session a consolidation of inputs made by the Contracting Parties during the discussions (GRVA-02-44). GRVA agreed with this consolidation in form of a table as reproduced in Annex II, with the expectation that this would provide a base for continued discussions at the March 2019 session of WP.29.
|
|
01 Feb 2019
|
Working Party
|
Informal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
Data Storage Systems for Automated Driving
DSSAD
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems (ALKS)
Automated Lane-Keeping Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to Automated Lane Keeping System
|
Proposal from the GRVA chair.
|
GRVA-02-0047
|
GRVA/2
|
Report of the GRVA on its 2nd session
Document Title: Report of the GRVA on its 2nd session
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 12 Mar 19 (Posted 12 Mar 19)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations | Session 177 | 11-15
Mar 2019
67. The representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Chair of GRVA, reported to WP.29 on the results achieved by GRVA during its second session (for more details see the report of the session ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2).
68. WP.29 requested that a special session of GRVA be organized in May or June 2019 according to room availabilities. The secretariat had been informed that no meeting room was available in the Palais des Nations from the mid-May to the mid-July period. The expert from the European Union offered to host the meeting in Brussels. The secretariat mentioned that this would require the establishment of a Host Country Agreement. The expert from Germany informed that this process was cumbersome and not feasible to conclude within a few weeks. The representative of OICA also offered to host, if deemed desirable, an informal meeting (without interpretation) in their office in Paris. WP.29 requested the secretariat (i) to verify the information provided on the room availability in the Palais des Nations, then (ii) to explore the possibility to host a meeting in one of the UN agencies in Geneva (as it was done for the GRPE session in June 2014 at the World Trade Organization), then (iii) to explore the possibility to host the meeting in one of the UN premises such as Bonn in Germany or New York City in the United States of America.
69. WP.29 approved the proposed mandate extensions for the IWGs on Modular Vehicle Combination (MVC) and on Automatically Commanded Steering Function (ACSF) until February 2020, as well as for the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air software updates until March 2020.
70. WP.29 noted the election of Mrs. C. Chen (China) and Mr. T. Onoda (Japan) as Vice-Chairpersons for the GRVA sessions in 2019.
World Forum for the Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations | Session 178 | 24-28
Jun 2019
43. The World Forum recalled the report of the Chair of GRVA on its second session (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2) and approved the report.
|
|
12 Mar 2019
|
Working Party
|
Report
|
|
|
GRVA/2
|
GRVA/2019/1
|
Annotated provisional agenda for the 2nd GRVA session
Document Title: Annotated provisional agenda for the 2nd GRVA session
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/1
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 21 Nov 18)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
2. GRVA considered the provisional agenda prepared for this first session and adopted it (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/1 and Add.1). The adopted agenda is reproduced in GRVA-02-15-Rev.1, including all informal documents received until the session’s starting date. GRVA also agreed on the running order for the session as proposed in GRVA-02-01. The informal documents distributed during the session are listed in Annex I of the session report.
|
|
21 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Agenda
|
|
|
GRVA/2019/0001
|
GRVA/2019/1/Add.1
|
Addendum to the provisional agenda for the 2nd (January 2019) GRVA session
Document Title: Addendum to the provisional agenda for the 2nd (January 2019) GRVA session
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/1/Add.1
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 14 Dec 18 (Posted 14 Dec 18)
|
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
2. GRVA considered the provisional agenda prepared for this first session and adopted it (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/1 and Add.1). The adopted agenda is reproduced in GRVA-02-15-Rev.1, including all informal documents received until the session’s starting date. GRVA also agreed on the running order for the session as proposed in GRVA-02-01. The informal documents distributed during the session are listed in Annex I of the session report.
|
|
14 Dec 2018
|
Working Party
|
Agenda
|
|
|
GRVA/2019/0001/Add.1
|
GRVA/2019/2
|
Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
Document Title: Proposal for a Recommendation on Cyber Security
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/2
|
Description: Proposal from the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air Software Update Issues to provide recommendations for the mitigation of risks of unauthorized access to critical automated vehicle software systems, including a proposal for a new UN Regulation.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 22 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 155 | Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
18. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates presented GRVA-02-03, containing a status report of the group’s activities since the previous GRVA session and introducing ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He mentioned that the group responded in writing to all the questions and comments received on the proposal.
19. The expert from FIA welcomed the proposal produced by the group but mentioned that it did not reflect their position regarding life time requirements.
20. The expert from OICA wondered whether such aspect raised by FIA would belong to the scope of the 1958 Agreement. The secretariat answered that some precedents could help answering this question e.g. UN Regulation No. 49 (including conformity of in-service vehicles/engines provisions), UN Regulation No. 59 (Replacement (retrofit) silencing systems), UN Regulation No. 83 (including durability requirements and “in use” requirements), UN Regulation No. 90 (Replacement braking parts) and UN Regulation No. 133 (Recyclability of motor vehicles). He stated that he was not aware of any provision of the Agreement that would limit the activities under this Agreement only to the performance of new vehicles. The expert from OICA, Secretary of the Task Force agreed to submit in written an informal document highlighting the difficulty faced by the group with this aspect. He presented, on the last day of the second GRVA session, GRVA-02-46 that described the issue of post-production, understood as the product lifetime starting after the production is definitely discontinued.
21. The expert from Germany and the Netherlands stated that the document should address the three following phases: system/vehicle development, production and post-production.
22. The expert from Japan supported the proposal ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2 and stated the need to adopt this document during this session, since the new UN Regulation proposed in the document was one of the important and needed Regulations for the improvement of vehicle safety.
23. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
24. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of category L from the scope of the document.
25. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the Task Force, responding to the advice received from the previous session of GRVA, reported on its proposal for a test phase to assure the draft produced. He presented the aim and the desired output of this activity.
26. GRVA agreed to keep the documents under this agenda item for continued review at next GRVA session. GRVA invited the Task Force to address the comments received and to proceed with the test phase. GRVA noted the need to make further progress on this item and requested the secretariat to explore the possibility to organize a special session of GRVA in May or June 2019.
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 3 | 3-4
Jun 2019
24. The expert from the United Kingdom, Co-Chair of the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air software updates (TF CS/OTA) reported (GRVA-03-02) on the work of the group (recommendations, a draft regulatory text with provisions for the approval of a manufacturer Cyber Security Management System and provisions for the approval of a vehicle with regards to cyber security), including the ongoing testing activities. He clarified that the outcome of the work did not aim at specifying technical solutions, preventing all kind of cyber security events to happen, securing systems outside of the vehicles (e.g. pendrives), specifying durability requirements, listing all risks and corresponding mitigation solutions, but rather a systems-based approach to security management.
25. He explained that the current testing phase was aimed at checking the robustness of the proposal. He noted that manufacturer involvement represented seventy per cent of the global sales. The expert from AVERE confirmed that North American manufacturers were involved in the testing phase. The output could result in the production of interpretation guidelines if necessary.
26. He answered to the questions raised by the GRVA experts. He confirmed that the work was involving Contracting Parties using the regime of self-certification, but that no Country had indicated their intention to become a sponsor in the sense of the 1998 Agreement.
27. The expert from the European Commission requested clarifications about the purpose of the non-regulatory text in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/2. He noted the importance to define pass/fail criteria (also for audits) in the context of mutual recognition of type approvals. He expressed the need to consider covering hardware updated in this context. He stated that cyber security impacts privacy protection and mentioned other regulations in other jurisdictions that could complement or impact the ongoing work, such as the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
28. The expert from France proposed to revisit the definition of a type in the regulatory draft. He proposed to consider the vehicle architecture as one discriminatory feature.
29. The expert from Germany expressed support to the test phase work and expressed the need to consider lifetime provisions.
30. The expert from CLEPA explained that their industry would have a role to play to support cyber security and asked that GRVA consider provisions that would address their role.
31. The expert from Sweden noted the proposal on slide 16 of GRVA-03-02 “UNECE may decide to develop a harmonized framework on [the post production and vehicle support by the manufacturer] topic” and proposed to reflect on this point.
32. The expert from Spain expressed concern with the lack of guarantee over the whole life cycle and proposed to look at practices of other industry sectors to explore best practices. She also noted that these activities were linked with the activities of existing cyber security authorities and that frameworks were already existing. She stated that the outcome of the test phase should result into amendments instead of interpretation documents.
33. The expert from ITU stated that basic requirements should be built in the communication side and that support provisions could be linked to the life of the communication system (He mentioned as an example the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) protocol shutdown).
34. The expert from FIGIEFA introduced GRVA-03-16 proposing amendments to ECE/TRAN/WP29/GRVA/2019/2. She mentioned the importance for the after sales sector to take into consideration their needs when drafting provisions. She proposed that Approval Authorities should, as neutral entities, determine independently from manufacturers the companies that are authorized parties. She proposed that the Regulation specifies that the manufacturers shall share with authorized parties: data, function calls and resources inside of the vehicle to allow third parties to provide services to maintain safety and security of vehicles during their lifetime. She also proposed to replace throughout the proposal “life cycle” by “life time”.
35. The expert from the United Kingdom, Co-Chair of the Task Force, explained that the Contracting Parties were able to nominate Approval Authorities according to their competencies (1958 Agreement, Article 2, para.2). He explained that the group did not reach consensus on the post production and support duration issue and that in that case existing national regulations would apply. He confirmed that the work of the group did not conflict with other regulations such as the European GDPR. He also confirmed that the group did not discuss in detail the level of access required in GRVA-03-16.
36. The expert from France stated that the Regulation should not freeze the market for repair and maintenance. But he also expressed concerns with safety and cyber security risks posed by automotive product modification and access as proposed in GRVA-03-16. The expert from Sweden also expressed interest to the position expressed in the document and agreed with France on the need for the right balance between access and security.
37. The expert from OICA stated that the access right matter is not a cyber security one. He added that such provisions clarifying access to data for the purpose of balanced market would be relevant for a Regulation dealing with access right issues.
|
|
22 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Cyber Security and Cyber Security Management
Cybersecurity
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to cyber security and cyber security management system
|
Proposal from the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air Software Update Issues to provide recommendations for the mitigation of risks of unauthorized access to critical automated vehicle software systems, including a proposal for a new UN Regulation.
|
GRVA/2019/0002
|
GRVA/2019/3
|
Recommendation on Software Updates
Document Title: Recommendation on Software Updates
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/3
|
Description: Proposal from the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air Software Update Issues for recommendations on requirements for the certification of software updates and processes to ensure their safe execution, including proposals for a new UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of software updates processes and for the establishment of software identification numbers (RXSWIN).
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 22 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements and UN Regulation No. 156 | Software Update Processes and Management Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
17. Due to lack of time, GRVA did not consider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/13, describing the principles of the “Three-Pillar Approach”, proposed by the experts from OICA (see GRVA-02-09 and GRVA-02-27).
27. GRVA noted that the presentation of GRVA-02-03 also introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3, that the proposal for a test phase would also apply to the software updates work stream. The expert from Japan also supported the document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3. He indicated Japan’s support for the earliest adoption (during this session), since the issue was important and a UN Regulation was needed for the improvement of vehicle safety.
28. The expert from EC provided comments on the proposal (GRVA-02-37).
29. The expert from IMMA presented GRVA-02-18, proposing to exclude vehicles of Category L from the scope of the document.
30. The expert from ITU stated that regulating communication would require specific expertise and that the precedent at the Working Party on General Safety provisions with the UN Regulation No. 144 (Accident Emergency Call Systems) ignored communication aspects and durability provisions. He raised the question whether a vehicle equipped with safety systems based on communication would still be roadworthy in case the communication would no longer function e.g. when the communication system would be obsolete. GRVA agreed that the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-the-Air Software Updates was a good example demonstrating that WP.29 was able to attract the required experts with the right expertise and to make very quick progress on such strategic issues. GRVA agreed about the need to discuss the roadworthiness of vehicles in case of the vehicle communication unit obsolescence would impact the well performing of safety systems.
31. GRVA agreed to keep ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/3 and GRVA-01-18 on the agenda of the next GRVA session.
|
|
22 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Guidelines of Software Update Technical Requirements
Software Updates Guidelines
Software Update Processes and Management Systems
SW Updates
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regards to software update and software update management system
|
Proposal from the Task Force on Cyber Security and Over-The-Air Software Update Issues for recommendations on requirements for the certification of software updates and processes to ensure their safe execution, including proposals for a new UN Regulation on uniform provisions concerning the approval of software updates processes and for the establishment of software identification numbers (RXSWIN).
|
GRVA/2019/0003
|
GRVA/2019/4
|
UN R79: Proposal for amendments
(UK)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/4
|
Description: Proposal to clarify the assessments to be conducted by a technical service for complex electronic systems, particularly with regard to advanced driver assistance systems. The proposal includes a new definition to ensure the assessment includes system response to changes in the ambient and/or operating conditions, provisions to ensure that any disabled functions intended for use on a production vehicle are declared and assessed, and a footnote to clarify that the assessment must be reviewed and signed by the same type approval authority as the one responsible for issuing the approval to UN R79.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 22 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
38. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/4 as amended by GRVA-02-19, proposing clarifications to Annex 6 of UN Regulation No. 79. The expert from OICA stated that the amendments proposed would require too much work for the approval of simple braking systems. He added that these amendments would make sense to properly assess Advanced Driver Assistant Systems (ADAS). The expert from EC stated that this proposal would be suitable as an amendment to UN Regulation No. 79 but would not be enough for the assessment of ALKS and ADAS. The expert from Spain mentioned that the Type Approval Authority signature provisions’ implications were too far-reaching to be mentioned in a footnote. Spain also observed that the proposal placed too much responsibility on the Type Approval Authority to identify risks and stated that the manufacturer should have that responsibility. The expert from the Netherlands explained that this work initially started for the purpose of ACSF of Category B2 defined in UN Regulation No. 79 and that this explained why the document was titled “Proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 79”. The expert from UK volunteered to submit a revised proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 79, addressing the comment received. GRVA agreed that similar provisions should be specifically developed for ALKS and systems with higher levels of autonomy. The Chair noted the implications that this would have on the delivery of a regulatory provision for ALKS.
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 4 | 24-27
Sep 2019
40. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/20, proposing amendments to Annex 6. He referred to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/4 and reported on the progress made since then. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-04-29 with amendment proposals to the official document. GRVA discussed and then adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/20, amended by Annex V, as a draft supplement to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2020 sessions.
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 3 | 3-4
Jun 2019
51. No information was provided under this agenda item.
|
|
22 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal to clarify the assessments to be conducted by a technical service for complex electronic systems, particularly with regard to advanced driver assistance systems. The proposal includes a new definition to ensure the assessment includes system response to changes in the ambient and/or operating conditions, provisions to ensure that any disabled functions intended for use on a production vehicle are declared and assessed, and a footnote to clarify that the assessment must be reviewed and signed by the same type approval authority as the one responsible for issuing the approval to UN R79.
|
GRVA/2019/0004
|
GRVA/2019/5
|
AEBS: Proposal for a new draft UN Regulation on the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their Advanced Emergency Braking System for M1 and N1 vehicles
Document Title: AEBS: Proposal for a new draft UN Regulation on the approval of motor vehicles with regard to their Advanced Emergency Braking System for M1 and N1 vehicles
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/5
|
Description: Document prepared by Japan and the European Commission on behalf of the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS). It provides the status of the proposed regulation through November 2018 in order to provide a basis for review and discussion during the January 2019 GRVA session.
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 22 Nov 18)
|
Document status: GR information
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 152 | Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
40. The expert from Japan, Co-Chair of the IWG on AEBS presented GRVA-02-28 with a status report on the activities of the group drafting a new UN Regulation with provisions applicable to vehicles of category M1 and N1 and introduced the corresponding proposal in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2019/5. He presented the key performance requirements defined for so called vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-pedestrians AEBS. He mentioned that some provisions were contained in square brackets indicating that decisions by GRVA were needed, e.g. the provisions for manual AEBS deactivation and the definition of performance requirements for vehicle-to-bicycle systems.
41. GRVA discussed provisions allowing for the manual deactivation of an AEBS. The expert from Australia informed that according to their survey, 93 per cent of respondents answered that they never deactivated their AEBS. GRVA, taking into account the risks in case of a misalignment of sensors, agreed to include provisions allowing manual deactivation on the basis that the provisions in the proposal ensured that the process required more than one action to complete.
42. GRVA reviewed the proposal and agreed with the text as reproduced in GRVA-02-39-Corr.1.
43. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit the proposal as amended in para. 42 as draft UN Regulation on Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M1 and N1 vehicles for consideration and vote by WP.29 and the Administrative Committee AC.1 at their June 2019 sessions.
46. The expert from OICA introduced GRVA-02-22, proposing amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/5. GRVA recommended that the proposal be reviewed by the IWG on AEBS and that this proposal would either be included in the submission of the IWG for the September 2019 session or be submitted as a separate proposal for review in September 2019, if no consensus would be reached on this proposal by the IWG on AEBS.
|
|
22 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Automatic Emergency Braking for M1/N1 vehicles
Light Vehicle AEBS
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles with regard to the Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS) for M<sub>1</sub> and N<sub>1</sub> vehicles
|
Document prepared by Japan and the European Commission on behalf of the Informal Working Group on Advanced Emergency Braking System (AEBS). It provides the status of the proposed regulation through November 2018 in order to provide a basis for review and discussion during the January 2019 GRVA session.
|
GRVA/2019/0005
|
GRVA/2019/6
|
UN R140: Proposal for a Supplement
(Australia)
Document Title: UN R140: Proposal for a Supplement
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/6
|
Description: Proposal to clarify that UN R140 does not mandate the installation of electronic stability control systems (ESC) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with an ESC system.
|
Submitted by: Australia
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 22 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 140 | Electronic Stability Control Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
47. The expert from Australia introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/6 addressing the concern expressed during the 175th WP.29 session. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-02-30) and reproduced in Annex IV. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 3 to UN Regulation No. 140 for consideration and vote at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
22 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Electronic Stability Control Systems
ESC Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars with regard to electronic stability control systems
|
Proposal to clarify that UN R140 does not mandate the installation of electronic stability control systems (ESC) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with an ESC system.
|
GRVA/2019/0006
|
GRVA/2019/7
|
UN R78: Proposal for amendments to the 04 series of amendments
(IMMA)
Document Title: UN R78: Proposal for amendments to the 04 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/7
|
Description: Proposal to introduce provisions relevant to the activation of stop lamps under more conditions than application of the service brake only, e.g. also by regenerative braking.
|
Submitted by: IMMA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 23 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 78 | Motorcycle and Moped Braking.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
55. The expert from IMMA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/7, introducing revised provisions on the stop lamps activation under more conditions than the application of the service brake only (e.g. regenerative braking). GRVA adopted the proposal as amended and reproduced in Annex VI to the report. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit Annex VI to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 78 for consideration and vote at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
23 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Motorcycle and Moped Braking
Motorcycle Braking
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles of Categories L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 with regard to Braking
|
Proposal to introduce provisions relevant to the activation of stop lamps under more conditions than application of the service brake only, e.g. also by regenerative braking.
|
GRVA/2019/0007
|
GRVA/2019/8
|
UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement
(UK)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for a Supplement
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/8
|
Description: Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) systems.
|
Submitted by: UK
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 23 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
56. The expert from UK introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/8 and
GRVA-02-08 amending it, proposing to insert technical prescriptions on Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) which were systems that were already installed on vehicles without being regulated to date. The expert from Germany did not support the proposal and suggested to insert one sentence in the Regulation that would forbid RCM in vehicles of category M1 and N1. The expert from OICA explained that such system already existed for vehicles of category M1G and that there would be future applications such as reverse assistant for trailers that would bring quantifiable benefits in terms of safety. Following comments and input from the experts from Australia, France and Sweden, the Chair asked GRVA whether the status quo would be acceptable, i.e. do Contracting Parties accept that such systems are permitted and do not require recognition by Regulation. The expert from the Russian Federation summed-up the discussion and suggested to adopt the proposal. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (Annex VII). GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their November 2019 session. GRVA unanimously agreed with this delayed submission until the November 2019, so that the dissent from the experts from Germany and the Netherlands could be considered again during the September 2019 session of GRVA, in view of reaching a broader consensus.
|
|
23 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of Remote Control Manoeuvring (RCM) systems.
|
GRVA/2019/0008
|
GRVA/2019/9
|
UN R79: Proposal for amendments
(France)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/9
|
Description: Proposal, based on document GRRF-86-13, to resolve measurement concerns in the test requirements for ACSF of Category B1 and C. The proposal addresses issues identified in Annex 8, improves reproducibility and robustness of the procedures, fills in gaps in the test cases, and provides additional details on measuring equipment and test execution.
|
Submitted by: France
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 23 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Next GR session
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
35. The expert from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/9 based on GRRF-86-13 proposing clarifications of the Annex 8 testing provisions. The proposal received some comments from Japan, France, Germany and OICA. The expert from France agreed with the suggestion of GRVA to submit a revised proposal with more data for consideration at the September 2019 session. The experts from Japan, Germany and OICA were invited to share with GRVA their test data, supporting their positions.
|
|
23 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal, based on document GRRF-86-13, to resolve measurement concerns in the test requirements for ACSF of Category B1 and C. The proposal addresses issues identified in Annex 8, improves reproducibility and robustness of the procedures, fills in gaps in the test cases, and provides additional details on measuring equipment and test execution.
|
GRVA/2019/0009
|
GRVA/2019/10
|
UN R79: Proposal for amendments
(France)
Document Title: UN R79: Proposal for amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/10
|
Description: Proposal to clarify requirements of the optical signal for a CSF intervention to ensure sufficient flashing tell-tale visibility for the driver, to specify the duration of such ACSF signals, to ensure a safe hierarchy of signals (e.g., ESF over CSF) by priority, to clarify that deactivation when departing an ODD means the “off mode”, and to add a cross-reference pointing to paragraphs that define cases of manual and automatic deactivation.
|
Submitted by: France
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 23 Nov 18)
|
Document status: GR amended and approved
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 79 | Steering Equipment.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
36. The expert from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/10, proposing clarifications to the tall-tell requirements for Corrective Steering Function (CSF), Emergency steering Function (ESF) and ACSF. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended and reproduced in Annex III. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit Annex III to the report as draft Supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79 to WP.29 and the Administrative Committee of the 1958 Agreement (AC. 1) for consideration and vote at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
23 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Steering Equipment
Steering Equipment
Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with regard to Steering Equipment
|
Proposal to clarify requirements of the optical signal for a CSF intervention to ensure sufficient flashing tell-tale visibility for the driver, to specify the duration of such ACSF signals, to ensure a safe hierarchy of signals (e.g., ESF over CSF) by priority, to clarify that deactivation when departing an ODD means the "off mode", and to add a cross-reference pointing to paragraphs that define cases of manual and automatic deactivation.
|
GRVA/2019/0010
|
GRVA/2019/11
|
UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement to the 02 series of amendments
(Russia)
Document Title: UN R90: Proposal for a Supplement to the 02 series of amendments
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/11
|
Description: Proposal to align the provisions of UN R90 related to approval numbers and markings with the provisions of Schedule 4 to the 1958 Agreement.
|
Submitted by: Russia
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 23 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Formal GR review
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 90 | Replacement Brake Linings, Discs, and Drums.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
62. The expert from the Russian Federation introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/11 aimed at addressing the issue raised in WP.29-176-19. The expert from CLEPA expressed reservations because customs could be confused by the introduction of differences between the Approval Number and the Approval Code proposed in this document. The expert from Spain mentioned that UN Regulation No. 90 was used in various countries not being Contracting Party to the 1958 Agreement and that therefore the issue raised concerning customs could be valid. The expert from Spain stated that Transitional Provisions could be added to the document. The expert from CLEPA stated the need to first test the markets with this new approach and agreed to undertake a study. The expert from the Russian Federation agreed to submit a revised proposal for consideration at the September 2019 session of GRVA.
|
|
23 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Replacement Brake Linings, Discs, and Drums
Replacement Brake Components
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement brake lining assemblies, drum brake linings and discs and drums for power-driven vehicles and their trailers
|
Proposal to align the provisions of UN R90 related to approval numbers and markings with the provisions of Schedule 4 to the 1958 Agreement.
|
GRVA/2019/0011
|
GRVA/2019/12
|
UN R139: Proposal for a Supplement
(Australia)
Document Title: UN R139: Proposal for a Supplement
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/12
|
Description: Proposal to clarify that UN R139 does not mandate the installation of brake assist systems (BAS) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with a BAS system.
|
Submitted by: Australia
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 23 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns UN Regulation No. 139 | Brake Assist Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
Meeting Reports
|
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1
Feb 2019
50. GRVA considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/12 (together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/6) under agenda item 7 (a) above. GRVA adopted the proposal as amended (GRVA-02-29) and reproduced in Annex V. GRVA requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 and AC.1 as draft Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 139 (BAS) for consideration and vote at their June 2019 sessions.
|
|
23 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Brake Assist Systems
Brake Assist Systems
Uniform provisions concerning the approval of passenger cars with regard to brake assist systems
|
Proposal to clarify that UN R139 does not mandate the installation of brake assist systems (BAS) on vehicles but rather specifies requirements for the approval of vehicles should they be equipped with a BAS system.
|
GRVA/2019/0012
|
GRVA/2019/13
|
Proposal for the Future Certification of Automated/Autonomous Driving Systems
(OICA)
Document Title: Proposal for the Future Certification of Automated/Autonomous Driving Systems
|
Document Reference Number: GRVA/2019/13
|
Description: Document to provide information on the proposed “3-pillar approach” certification scheme to demonstrate the level of safety and reliability which allows for safe market introduction of automated/autonomous vehicles.
|
Submitted by: OICA
|
Meeting Session: 2nd GRVA session (28 Jan-1
Feb 2019)
|
Document date: 19 Nov 18 (Posted 21 Nov 18)
|
Document status: Superseded
|
This document concerns WP.29 Regulatory Project | Automated Driving Systems.
This submission is related to the following document(s):
|
|
21 Nov 2018
|
Working Party
|
Formal Documents
|
Automated Driving Systems
Automated Driving
|
Document to provide information on the proposed "3-pillar approach" certification scheme to demonstrate the level of safety and reliability which allows for safe market introduction of automated/autonomous vehicles.
|
GRVA/2019/0013
|