| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | Human modeling and Q6 dummy kinematics | ||||||||||
| Date | 16 Apr 2013 | ||||||||||
| Source(s) | IFSTTAR | ||||||||||
| Status | |||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| Downloads: | .pdf format | ||||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| CRS | Session 38 | 16 Apr 2013 |
DOREL presents results on tests performed with the NPACS belted bench & Q6 (CRS-38-03). Installation method was in line with R44 regulation. Despite, simulations with the Q6 model show submarining effect when the bench has a 5° angle, there were no evidence of submarining with these current tests. Human modeling and Q6 kinematics (CRS-38-04) from IFSTTAR: Simulation of the bench model from TUB and First results with the 6 years olds human model => Human Model submarines when directly installed on the bench, no submarining occurs when it is in a CRS. The safety benefit of a booster is shown by the human model not by the Q6 dummy. |
||||||||||