| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Final progress report on the proposal to develop amendment 2 to GTR 9 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRSP/2012/2 | ||||||||
| Date |
13 Mar 2012
|
||||||||
| Summary | Review of the work behind the proposal to clarify GTR 9, in particular concerning the definition of the headform testing/contact area for measurement purposes. | ||||||||
| Source(s) | Netherlands | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 9 Pedestrian Safety (GTR) | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| WP.29/2021/54 | GTR 9: Final progress report on the development of Amendment 3 | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .doc format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRSP | Session 51 | 21-25 May 2012 |
11. As follow-up of the concerns raised during the December 2011 session of GRSP, the expert from EC introduced GRSP-51-10-Rev.1, jointly prepared by the experts from the Netherlands and OICA, amending the initial proposal. The proposal received further comments from the experts from South Korea, Japan and the United States of America. Accordingly, GRSP considered GRSP-51-33-Rev.2 (superseding GRSP-51-10 GRSP-51-10-Rev.1 and GRSP-51-33-Rev.1). However, some experts requested a study reservation of the proposal. GRSP requested the secretariat to distribute GRSP-51-33-Rev.2 with an official symbol at its December 2012 session. Finally, GRSP recommended experts to prepare an update of the final report of the amendment of the UN GTR (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2012/2), if needed and draft a similar proposal of amendments to the UN Regulation on pedestrian safety for the next session of GRSP. |
||||||||