| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Proposal for Corrigendum 5 to Revision 6 to Regulation No. 48 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRE/2011/53 | ||||||||
| Date |
2 Aug 2011
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | UK and CLEPA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R48 Installation of Lighting | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRE | Session 66 | 4-6 Oct 2011 |
12. GRE agreed to consider ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2011/53 under item 4.(a) of the agenda (see para. 7). 6. GRE considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2011/49 from the GTB expert introducing the vehicle speed as a criterion for operating adaptive stop-lamps. GRE noted a number of comments and agreed to reconsider this document at its March 2012 session, possibly with a demonstration by GTB on vehicles complying with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2011/49 requirements. 7. GRE considered ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2011/62 by the expert from Germany together with ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2011/53 by the experts from the United Kingdom and CLEPA, both on the conspicuity marking of commercial vehicles. GRE could not reach a final decision on these proposals and agreed to reconsider this issue at its next session on the basis of a joint revised proposal by the experts from Germany, United Kingdom, CLEPA and all interested experts (Focal point: Mr. Mainz – karl.manz@kit.edu. 8. GRE agreed to remove from the agenda the issue raised by the expert from the Netherlands concerning the way to avoid inadvertent changes to the colour allowed for front positions lamps in Regulation No 48. |
||||||||