| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | UN R48: Proposal for a new series of amendments | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRE/2020/8/Rev.1 | ||||||||
| Date |
6 Aug 2020
|
||||||||
| Summary | Proposal to introduce new requirements for headlamp levelling, in particular on the vertical inclination in relation to the dipped-beam headlamp mounting height. | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R48 Installation of Lighting | ||||||||
| Proposal Status | Superseded | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRE-82-25 | UN R48: Proposal for a new series of amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
| SLR-39-19/Rev.1 | UN R48: Justification for GRE/2020/8 | ||||||||
| SLR-39-20 | UN R48: Proposal to retain Manual Headlamp Levelling | ||||||||
| GRE-83-41 | UN R48: Comments on document GRE/2020/8/Rev.1 (superseded) | ||||||||
| GRE-83-31 | UN R48: Revised proposal for a new [0x] series of amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
| SLR-HL-03 | UN R48: Headlamp leveling provisions including 5 November 2020 SLR informal group session | ||||||||
| SLR-HL-03-Rev.1 | UN R48: Revised proposal aligned with the 07 and [08] series of amendments | ||||||||
| SLR-HL-07-Rev.2 | UN R48: Manual levelling for M2, M3, N2, N3, MG (off road), NG (off road) | ||||||||
| GRE/2020/8/Rev.2 | UN R48: Revised proposal for a new series of amendments (superseded) | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRE | Session 83 | 19-23 Oct 2020 |
29. Based on a proposal of IWG SLR, GRE continued its deliberations for preparing a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 with new requirements for headlamp aiming and automatic levelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/8/Rev.1). The expert from Poland held the view that the justification part contained mistakes and inconsistencies and recalled his earlier proposals on the subject (GRE-83-41). Several experts expressed their support to the IWG SLR proposal. 30. The expert from OICA proposed to keep an option of manual levelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/23 and GRE-83-31). Some experts supported this option, while others were not in favour. 31. In the absence of a consensus, GRE stressed the need to finalize the issue as soon as possible and requested IWG SLR to take into account the comments made and to prepare a revised working document for the next session, based on the following principles:
32. The expert from Poland did not agree to that conclusion. 33. GRE instructed IWG SLR to organize a separate meeting on this issue and encouraged all experts of Contracting Parties to participate. 29. Based on a proposal of IWG SLR, GRE continued its deliberations for preparing a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 with new requirements for headlamp aiming and automatic levelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/8/Rev.1). The expert from Poland held the view that the justification part contained mistakes and inconsistencies and recalled his earlier proposals on the subject (GRE-83-41). Several experts expressed their support to the IWG SLR proposal. 30. The expert from OICA proposed to keep an option of manual levelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/23 and GRE-83-31). Some experts supported this option, while others were not in favour. 31. In the absence of a consensus, GRE stressed the need to finalize the issue as soon as possible and requested IWG SLR to take into account the comments made and to prepare a revised working document for the next session, based on the following principles:
32. The expert from Poland did not agree to that conclusion. 33. GRE instructed IWG SLR to organize a separate meeting on this issue and encouraged all experts of Contracting Parties to participate. 29. Based on a proposal of IWG SLR, GRE continued its deliberations for preparing a new series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 48 with new requirements for headlamp aiming and automatic levelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/8/Rev.1). The expert from Poland held the view that the justification part contained mistakes and inconsistencies and recalled his earlier proposals on the subject (GRE-83-41). Several experts expressed their support to the IWG SLR proposal. 30. The expert from OICA proposed to keep an option of manual levelling (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2020/23 and GRE-83-31). Some experts supported this option, while others were not in favour. 31. In the absence of a consensus, GRE stressed the need to finalize the issue as soon as possible and requested IWG SLR to take into account the comments made and to prepare a revised working document for the next session, based on the following principles:
32. The expert from Poland did not agree to that conclusion. 33. GRE instructed IWG SLR to organize a separate meeting on this issue and encouraged all experts of Contracting Parties to participate. |
||||||||