1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Document Title Corrigendum 1 to the proposal for the Definitions of Automated Driving under WP.29 and the General Principles for developing a UN Regulation on automated vehicles
Reference Number WP.29/2018/2/Corr.1
Date
2 Mar 2018
Summary Corrigendum from the ITS/AD informal group to note that the provisions in the table ending on page 11 for ACSF Category B2 and ACSF Category E are under discussion.
Rulemaking Area(s) Automated Driving
Proposal Status WP.29 amended and adopted
Meeting(s)
Related Documents
WP.29/2018/2 Proposal for the Definitions of Automated Driving under WP.29 and the General Principles for developing a UN Regulation on automated vehicles
Downloads
UNECE server .pdf format .docx format
Excerpts from session reports related to this document
WP.29 | Session 174 | 12-16 Mar 2018

31. WP.29 agreed with the proposals of the IWG and (a) requested that GRRF address the work item on Data Storage System for Automated Driving (DSSAD), (b) extend the mandate of the group until March 2020 and (c) adopt ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/2 with the following modifications:

  1. Page 2, paragraph 1, sentence 2, amend to read: “These principles may be treated as guidelines for developing new regulations related to automated driving systems at WP.29”
  2. Page 3, Table, Column 3, Line “Outline of Classification”, the footnote (shown by an asterisk * and associated with the words “Operational Design Domain (ODD)”) shall be deleted (along with its content below the main text);
  3. Page 11, endnote, amend to read: “The positioning of these functional categories in this table are subject to further consideration by UNECE WP.29.”

32. WP.29 requested that the secretariat prepare a consolidated version of this document.

31. WP.29 agreed with the proposals of the IWG and (a) requested that GRRF address the work item on Data Storage System for Automated Driving (DSSAD), (b) extend the mandate of the group until March 2020 and (c) adopt ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2018/2 with the following modifications:

  1. Page 2, paragraph 1, sentence 2, amend to read: “These principles may be treated as guidelines for developing new regulations related to automated driving systems at WP.29”
  2. Page 3, Table, Column 3, Line “Outline of Classification”, the footnote (shown by an asterisk * and associated with the words “Operational Design Domain (ODD)”) shall be deleted (along with its content below the main text);
  3. Page 11, endnote, amend to read: “The positioning of these functional categories in this table are subject to further consideration by UNECE WP.29.”

32. WP.29 requested that the secretariat prepare a consolidated version of this document.