Show admin view
Presentation: Cumulative 3ms Not Consistent in R129
Document CRS-54-05
27 October 2015

Presentation to highlight inconsistencies in the lateral and forward cumulative head and chest acceleration injury criteria (determination of the maximum acceleration with a cumulative duration of at least 3ms).

Submitted by Tass
Download document
Previous Documents, Discussions, and Outcomes
5. | Validation of Amendment 1 of ECE R129
6. | Work on Amendment 2 of ECE R129 (phase II)
6.1. | Double marking on modular systems
6.2. | Shoulder belt positioning
6.3. | Feedback from TRL study (Chest deflection measurement,…)
6.5. | Internal dimensions
6.7. | Presentation of German workshop organised by the German Kindersicherheit Kreiss (“child safety working group”) from Sebastian WEBER (AUDI)
6.8. | Cumulative acceleration (3ms) presentation by TASS

show and explain difference between γ(3ms) cumulatively & γ(3ms) continually.

According to Farid BENDJELLAL (BRITAX) , it’s not clear in the current R129 regulation.

It’s different in the R44 regulation because it’s defines 3ms “exceedance”. For Tommy PETTERSSON (VTI), we do not have to change the current R44 regulation. Pierre CASTAING (UTAC & chairman) agree to make modification for γ(3ms) cumulatively for phase I in chapter 8.1 and Annex 17. Erik SALTERS (DOREL): we can add something like “Align R129 to R44 by improving definition of R129.

8. | Work on phase III
Relates to UN R129 |