1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | Proposal for amendments to GTR No. 3 | ||||||||
Reference Number | GRRF-80-25 | ||||||||
Date |
17 Sep 2015
|
||||||||
Summary | EC responses to IMMA comments (document GRRF-80-13) on the proposal to align the text with the provisions for anti-lock braking systems (ABS) used in other regulations (document GRRF/2015/40). | ||||||||
Source(s) | EC | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 3 Motorcycle Brakes | ||||||||
Proposal Status | Superseded | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Related Documents | |||||||||
GRRF/2015/40 | Proposal for an amendment of Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (superseded) | ||||||||
GRRF-80-13 | IMMA comments on the proposed motorcycle ABS braking changes (Documents GRRF/2015/40 and 41) | ||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
GRRF | Session 80 | 15-18 Sep 2015 |
24. The expert from EC introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/40 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/41, proposing to clarify the possibility to install means to temporarily reduce or disable the ABS function of motorcycles in certain conditions. The expert from Canada submitted an alternative wording (GRRF-80-19) and recalled that an authorization from the Executive Committee AC.3 for developing an amendment to GTR No. 3 would be required. The proposal received some general comments related to road safety. The expert from IMMA briefly introduced GRRF-80-13 commenting the proposals to which the expert from EC responded (GRRF-80-24 and GRRF-80-25). A majority of experts expressed a specific concern related to condition (f). The expert from EC volunteered to prepare two revised proposals for the [February 2016] session of GRRF. 24. The expert from EC introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/40 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/41, proposing to clarify the possibility to install means to temporarily reduce or disable the ABS function of motorcycles in certain conditions. The expert from Canada submitted an alternative wording (GRRF-80-19) and recalled that an authorization from the Executive Committee AC.3 for developing an amendment to GTR No. 3 would be required. The proposal received some general comments related to road safety. The expert from IMMA briefly introduced GRRF-80-13 commenting the proposals to which the expert from EC responded (GRRF-80-24 and GRRF-80-25). A majority of experts expressed a specific concern related to condition (f). The expert from EC volunteered to prepare two revised proposals for the [February 2016] session of GRRF. 24. The expert from EC introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/40 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/2015/41, proposing to clarify the possibility to install means to temporarily reduce or disable the ABS function of motorcycles in certain conditions. The expert from Canada submitted an alternative wording (GRRF-80-19) and recalled that an authorization from the Executive Committee AC.3 for developing an amendment to GTR No. 3 would be required. The proposal received some general comments related to road safety. The expert from IMMA briefly introduced GRRF-80-13 commenting the proposals to which the expert from EC responded (GRRF-80-24 and GRRF-80-25). A majority of experts expressed a specific concern related to condition (f). The expert from EC volunteered to prepare two revised proposals for the [February 2016] session of GRRF. |
||||||||