| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Proposal for amendments to Regulations No. 90 | ||||||||
| Reference Number | GRRF-80-12 | ||||||||
| Date |
14 Sep 2015
|
||||||||
| Summary | Proposal to remove tables specifying general values for replacement discs and drums that are identical to the original (2.3.3.4) since such replacements must by definition have values identical to the corresponding original parts. The proposal also would change the maximum permitted thickness variation of discs for medium and heavy vehicles from 0.030 mm to 0.050 mm (the common OEM specification). | ||||||||
| Source(s) | CLEPA | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R90 Replacement Brake Components | ||||||||
| Proposal Status | Superseded | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Related Documents | |||||||||
| GRRF/2016/22 | Proposal for an amendment to Regulation No. 90 (superseded) | ||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | .docx format | |||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| GRRF | Session 80 | 15-18 Sep 2015 |
29. The expert from CLEPA introduced GRRF-80-12 proposing amendments to provisions defined for equivalent brake discs and drums and a relaxation of the requirement on the thickness variation for interchangeable replacement discs or drums. The expert from OICA expressed some concerns. The experts from OICA and CLEPA agreed review the proposal together. GRRF requested the secretariat to distribute the proposal with an official symbol for its February 2016 session. |
||||||||