The deadline for the submission of official working documents is 20 November 2017.
Agenda Item 6.
Regulation No. 90
Documentation
GRRF-86-37
UN R90: Presentation highlighting cost concerns with the new 1958 Agreement approval numbering system
UN R90: Presentation highlighting cost concerns with the new 1958 Agreement approval numbering system
CLEPA presentation on the type approval process for replacement brake pads, linings, and drums and the impact of the new approval numbering system adopted under Revision 3 to the 1958 Agreement on approvals and markings of these products.
Proposal to resolve inconsistencies present from Supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments resulting from the approval of proposals in documents GRRF/2014/23/Rev.2, GRRF/2015/22 and GRRF/2016/22. The proposal also introduces provisions for L category (motorcycle and related) vehicles.
Proposal of requirements for L category vehicles. The original proposal addressed a broader range of issues and could not be finalized during the GRRF session. This document allows items where consensus was reached to move forward for WP.29 consideration.
GRRF-86-41
UN R90: Draft proposal for amendments to Annex 7
UN R90: Draft proposal for amendments to Annex 7
Proposal to add replacement brake components for L6 and L7 (quadricycles) to the regulation, to correct references, and to clarify the text. This proposal aligns UN R90 with UN R78 (motorcycle braking).
WP.29/2016/58
Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 90
Proposal for Supplement 3 to the 02 series of amendments to Regulation No. 90
Proposal to introduce provisions for the approval of replacement brake discs for L-category (motorcycle and related) vehicles, to remove tables specifying general values for replacement discs and drums that are identical to the original, change the maximum permitted thickness variation of discs for medium and heavy vehicles from 0.030 mm to 0.040 mm, and clarify the text in order to avoid additional administrative and financial costs to the applicant due to misinterpretation of the intent of the text.
This proposal (WP.29/2016/58) was adopted by the World Forum. Thirty-four Contracting Parties out of the 42 applying UN R90 were present for the vote by AC.1. Thirty-four voted in favor with zero against and zero abstaining.