Proposal to facilitate the administrative control of two-stage requirements

25. The experts from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18
and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19, on behalf of the ad hoc group to develop an amendment that clarifies the definitions of the cowl monitoring and windscreen areas, as well as of the jerk area. The expert from the Netherlands recommended that a specific symbol in the type-approval marking should be added for vehicles approved using the specific provisions related to bonnet rear reference line. Accordingly, the experts from France and OICA introduced GRSP-72-41 and GRSP-72-44 amending respectively ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19.

26. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19, both as amended by annex IV of the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals as Supplement 2 to the 03 Series of Amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18) and as Supplement 1 to the 04 Series of Amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19) to UN Regulation No. 127 (Pedestrian safety) to the June 2023 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.

Proposal makes a few minor adaptations and clarifications to the existing requirements.

25. The experts from France introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18
and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19, on behalf of the ad hoc group to develop an amendment that clarifies the definitions of the cowl monitoring and windscreen areas, as well as of the jerk area. The expert from the Netherlands recommended that a specific symbol in the type-approval marking should be added for vehicles approved using the specific provisions related to bonnet rear reference line. Accordingly, the experts from France and OICA introduced GRSP-72-41 and GRSP-72-44 amending respectively ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19.

26. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19, both as amended by annex IV of the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals as Supplement 2 to the 03 Series of Amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/18) and as Supplement 1 to the 04 Series of Amendments (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/19) to UN Regulation No. 127 (Pedestrian safety) to the June 2023 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.

This proposal aims at re-introducing a text (allowing tolerances on the vehicle mass) that was deleted by the 02 series of amendments.

42. The expert from Germany introduced ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/22, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/23 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/24 to reintroduce a text that allows tolerances of the vehicle mass and simplified testing into UN Regulations Nos. 94, 95 and 137. Moreover, GRSP noted GRSP-72-46, jointly prepared by the experts from Germany and the Netherlands, to re-introduce the same provisions into UN Regulation No. 135.

43. GRSP adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/22, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/23 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/24, all not amended, and GRSP-72-46, as reproduced in annex VII to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the proposals – as draft Supplement 2 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 94 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/22), draft Supplement 3 to the 05 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 95 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/23), draft Supplement 3 to the 02 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 137 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2022/24), and draft Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendment to UN Regulation No. 135 (GRSP-72-46) – to the June 2023 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1.

30. The expert from the Netherlands, on behalf of the ad hoc group on Child Restraint Systems (CRS) introduced GRSP-72-28, aimed at explaining the current situation concerning inconsistency of requirements on lower tether anchorages and for the use of a support leg for other situations than i-Size seating positions in UN Regulations Nos. 129 and 145. GRSP referred discussion to agenda item 24 (g) on priorities identified by GRSP-72-28 (see paragraph 60 below).

The H-point machine is used to verify the Seat Reference Point of the driver seat (and other seating positions in the car). This SRP is the basis of many prescriptions related to e.g. seat strength/head restraint requirements, seat belt anchorage locations, forward field of vision requirements, rearward visibility, etc.

59. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSP-72-33 on a possible solution to harmonize the three-dimensional H-Point Machine (3D HPM). He informed GRSP that the Working Party on General Safety Provisions already begun work with an ad hoc group supported by the expert from Spain. GRSP agreed to resume consideration on GRSP-72-33 and on the outcome of discussion of a group of interested experts (China, the Netherlands, Spain CLEPA and OICA) at its May 2023 session.

Proposal to introduce new requirements for Complex Electronic Control Systems, in line with the corresponding provisions for passenger cars in UN Regulation No. 13-H

Draft proposal to introduce a definition, requirements, and a test procedure for CRS lower tether anchorages.

43. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSG-124-27, narrating a lack of consistency between different UN Regulations and UN GTRs when referencing different versions of the three-dimensional H point machine and the test procedures to measure the H point. He further provided a proposal (GRSG-124-30) indicating possible solutions to solve such inconsistencies. GRSG agreed on GRSG-124-30 as a possible solution and to: (a) introduce it informally at the AC.2 November 2022 session, (b) explain the GRSG solution in the highlights of the Chair of GRSG at the November 2022 session of WP.29, and (c) seek agreement on the use of the concerned SAE standard (drawings and specifications of the machine) with an SAE representative to WP.29, with the support of the representative of the Netherlands.

43. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSG-124-27, narrating a lack of consistency between different UN Regulations and UN GTRs when referencing different versions of the three-dimensional H point machine and the test procedures to measure the H point. He further provided a proposal (GRSG-124-30) indicating possible solutions to solve such inconsistencies. GRSG agreed on GRSG-124-30 as a possible solution and to: (a) introduce it informally at the AC.2 November 2022 session, (b) explain the GRSG solution in the highlights of the Chair of GRSG at the November 2022 session of WP.29, and (c) seek agreement on the use of the concerned SAE standard (drawings and specifications of the machine) with an SAE representative to WP.29, with the support of the representative of the Netherlands.

55. GRVA discussed GRVA-14-54, prepared by the Secretary on the basis of input received, and proposing guidance to the GRs dealing with the screening of UN Regulations and UN GTRs. The proposal received comments from the experts from China, France (GRVA-14-53), Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and the Russian Federation as well as from OICA (GRVA-14-56). GRVA confirmed that ALKS was not in the scope of this screening. GRVA endorsed GRVA-14-54/Rev.1 with guidance for the experts from all GRs, involved in these activities. GRVA requested the Chair to inform AC.2 about this coordination between the GRs.

Input concerning the review of existing UN Regulations and Global Technical Regulations with regard to their application to vehicles equipped with Automated Driving Systems.

This informal document proposes amendments to UN R78 to introduce new requirements for “Complex Electronic Control Systems” aimed at addressing new technologies such as automatically commanded braking.

106. The expert from IMMA presented ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/26, introducing provisions for the type approval of automatically commanded braking systems. The experts from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland supported the proposal. The expert from Canada noted that automatically commanded braking systems might surprise riders and might have unintended consequences. He inquired whether the safety of these systems would be covered elsewhere. The expert from IMMA explained that the safety requirements were included in the proposal in GRVA-14-09.

107. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRVA-14-09, prepared together with the expert from IMMA. He explained that the proposal was aimed at introducing a complex electronic annex on the model of the one in other braking regulations.

108. The expert from Canada noted that such annex was based on audit requirements, without pass/fail requirements. The expert from IMMA acknowledged that a discussion under the 1998 Agreement would require measurable pass/fail criteria.

109. The expert from France and from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland supported the aim of the proposal.

110. GRVA adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2022/26 and requested the secretariat to submit it as a supplement to the 05 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 78 to WP.29 and AC.1 for consideration and vote at their March 2023 sessions.

111. GRVA requested the secretariat to distribute GRVA-14-09 with an official symbol at the next GRVA session. The expert from IMMA confirmed, upon request by the secretariat, that it was a proposal for a new 06 series of amendments.

Proposes the addition of design qualification tests also will harmonize with ISO 15500-13:2012, and the North American CSA/ANSI PRD 1 (2020).

20. GRSG considered documents prepared by the Task Force on UN Regulation No 110: (a) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/23 that introduces the minimum opening set pressure of the primary Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) relief valve, (b) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/24 and (c) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/25 that updates the existing requirements for CNG/LNG fuelled components. The expert from OICA proposed that the three documents be combined together as a new series of amendments. Therefore, he introduced GRSG-124-31-Rev.1, consolidating the three proposals and amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/24. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/23, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/24 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/25 as amended by annex II to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the combined document of the three proposals as the 06 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 110 for consideration and vote at the March 2023 sessions of AC.1 and WP.29.

Update paragraphs to be in line with the requirements of ISO15500 and NGV3.1 (industry standards for CNG).

20. GRSG considered documents prepared by the Task Force on UN Regulation No 110: (a) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/23 that introduces the minimum opening set pressure of the primary Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) relief valve, (b) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/24 and (c) ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/25 that updates the existing requirements for CNG/LNG fuelled components. The expert from OICA proposed that the three documents be combined together as a new series of amendments. Therefore, he introduced GRSG-124-31-Rev.1, consolidating the three proposals and amending ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/24. GRSG adopted ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/23, ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/24 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/25 as amended by annex II to the session report. The secretariat was requested to submit the combined document of the three proposals as the 06 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 110 for consideration and vote at the March 2023 sessions of AC.1 and WP.29.

67. The representative from The Netherlands introduced GRPE-86-39 on the developments in the Netherlands with regard to checking vehicle emissions in PTI. The representative from EUROMOT sought further clarifications about the intention with non-road mobile machinery data. The representative from The Netherlands informed that the intention was to provide emission requirements for any construction/ renovation projects for public procurements, including NOx emissions quotas for the projects to be met by the service provider, where an amount of NOx emissions would be contractually agreed.

18. The expert from the Netherlands introduced GRSP-71-17 to GRSP which decided to collect more information on the barriers that have been used for type approval testing of lateral impact and on their compliance or not with UN Regulation No. 95. For the time being, GRSP agreed to resume discussion at the December 2022 session until more information would be made available to make sure that barriers used for type approval testing are fully compliant.

46. The expert from the Netherlands gave a presentation (GRSP-71-18) to introduce a future proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 134, considering the background of UN Regulations Nos. 12, 94 and 95 to have a consistent approach in all crash test configurations. He added that all UN Regulations on vehicle impact concern vehicle categories M1 and N1 against a passenger car (M1) and are not intended to cover the impact of a truck or bus against another vehicle. Impact tests were not required for N2, N3, M2 and M3 category of vehicles. The expert from OICA further proposed to establish a task force to align UN Regulation No. 134 with UN GTR No. 13, Phase 2. GRSP agreed to establish the task force with the Netherlands as coordinator and OICA (Ms. A. Schuessling, contact) as secretariat, which would start transposing UN GTR No. 13, Phase 2 into UN Regulation No. 134. Participants would include the experts from France, Japan, EC, CLEPA and other stakeholders for the time being. The task force would be expected to encompass GRSP-71-12 into the solutions provided for the issues highlighted in GRSP-71-18 and submit at least an informal document to the December 2022 session of GRSP.