| previous meeting | next meeting |
| Attendance | |||
| 1. | Adoption of the agenda |
In accordance with Chapter III, Rule 7 of the Rules of Procedure (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/690/Rev.2) of the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), the first item on the provisional agenda is the adoption of the agenda.
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-19 | GRSG-125: Updated agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-19 | GRSG-125: Updated agenda for the March 2023 session
|
GRSG/2023/1 | GRSG: Annotated provisional agenda for the 125th (March 2023) session
GRSG-125-06 | GRSG-125: Running order of the agenda for the March 2023 session
GRSG-125-19 | GRSG-125: Updated agenda for the March 2023 session
|
| 2. | Amendments to Regulations on Buses and Coaches: UN Regulation No. 107 (M2 and M3 vehicles) |
GRSG may wish to be informed by the experts of the Working Party on Passive Safety (GRSP) on the outcome of recent meetings of the informal working group (IWG) on “Securing of Children in buses and coaches” on developing a UN Regulation under the 1958 Agreement.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-125-10 | Crash protection of buses in frontal collisions
GRSG-125-18 | Status report from the STCBC informal group
GRSG-125-18 | Status report from the STCBC informal group
GRSG-125-32 | Commercial Vehicle Safety Priorities-Ranking of future priorities in the UK
GRSG agreed to continue the consideration of specifications on autonomous shuttles with a view to reviewing the applicability of existing requirements or creating new categories of these vehicles.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG-125-10 | Crash protection of buses in frontal collisions
GRSG-125-18 | Status report from the STCBC informal group
GRSG-125-32 | Commercial Vehicle Safety Priorities-Ranking of future priorities in the UK
|
GRSG-125-10 | Crash protection of buses in frontal collisions
GRSG-125-18 | Status report from the STCBC informal group
GRSG-125-29 | UN R107: Bus and coach accessibility
GRSG-125-31 | Paper: Passenger, Goods, and Agricultural Vehicle Safety-Effectiveness of Existing Measures and Ranking of Priorities in the UK
GRSG-115-04 | Front section collision protection on buses
Discussion paper proposing an effort to develop safety requirements for the protection of the driver and
tourist guide situation at the front of motor coaches.
GRSG/2007/33 | Proposal for a new regulation for vehicles of category M3 with regard to the protection of the driver and crew member(s) seated alongside the driver in the case of a frontal collision
GRSG-125-32 | Commercial Vehicle Safety Priorities-Ranking of future priorities in the UK
|
| 3. | Amendments to Safety Glazing Regulations | ||
| 3. (a) | UN Global Technical Regulation No. 6 (Safety glazing) |
GRSG may wish to consider proposals to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 6, if any. |
|
| 3. (b) | UN Regulation No. 43 (Safety glazing) |
GRSG agreed to consider a proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 43 tabled by the expert from the Republic of Korea (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/7), to exempt in Zone I, the possible opaque obscuration in the test area on the windscreen, and to maintain accurate harmonization between the 1958 and 1998 Agreements.
GRSG-125-09 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles. This proposal updates and supersedes document GRSG/2023/7.
GRSG-125-09 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles. This proposal updates and supersedes document GRSG/2023/7.
GRSG-125-09 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles. This proposal updates and supersedes document GRSG/2023/7.
GRSG-125-09 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles. This proposal updates and supersedes document GRSG/2023/7.
GRSG-125-09 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles. This proposal updates and supersedes document GRSG/2023/7.
GRSG-125-13 | UN R43: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/7
Proposal to correct a reference in the draft Supplement 11 to the 01 series of amendments to the “Test Area B defined in Annex 18”, which actually is meant to refer to Annex 21.
GRSG-125-13 | UN R43: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/7
Proposal to correct a reference in the draft Supplement 11 to the 01 series of amendments to the “Test Area B defined in Annex 18”, which actually is meant to refer to Annex 21.
GRSG/2023/7 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles.
GRSG/2023/7 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles.
GRSG/2023/7 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles.
|
GRSG/2023/7 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles.
GRSG-125-09 | UN R43: Proposal for Supplement 11 to the 01 Series of Amendments
Proposal to align UN R43 with provisions in GTR 6 concerning the exemption of possible opaque obscuration areas from Zone I of the test area on the windscreen of M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub> and N categories of vehicles. This proposal updates and supersedes document GRSG/2023/7.
GRSG-125-13 | UN R43: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/7
Proposal to correct a reference in the draft Supplement 11 to the 01 series of amendments to the “Test Area B defined in Annex 18”, which actually is meant to refer to Annex 21.
GRSG-125-13 | UN R43: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/7
Proposal to correct a reference in the draft Supplement 11 to the 01 series of amendments to the “Test Area B defined in Annex 18”, which actually is meant to refer to Annex 21.
|
| 4. | Awareness of the Proximity of Vulnerable Road Users |
GRSG may wish to be informed on the outcome of work of the IWG on awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity (VRU-Proxi) concerning the improvement of UN Regulation No. 158 on the temporary obstruction of the monitor view and on Phase 2 of UN Regulation No. 167 on Direct Vision.
GRSG-125-21 | VRU-Proxi informal group: Proposal to amend the terms of reference
GRSG-125-21 | VRU-Proxi informal group: Proposal to amend the terms of reference
GRSG-125-21 | VRU-Proxi informal group: Proposal to amend the terms of reference
GRSG-125-21 | VRU-Proxi informal group: Proposal to amend the terms of reference
GRSG-125-22 | Status report of the VRU-Proxi informal group
|
GRSG-125-22 | Status report of the VRU-Proxi informal group
GRSG-125-21 | VRU-Proxi informal group: Proposal to amend the terms of reference
|
| 4. (a) | UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision) |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on a proposal of amendments to UN Regulation No. 46 tabled by the expert from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA), to introduce provisions adapted to centre-steered vehicles of categories M2, M3, N2, N3 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/9 based on GRSG-124-20-Rev.1).
GRSG-125-03/Rev.1 | UN R46: Proposal supplementing document GRSG/2023/16
Proposal to add illustrations and editorial improvements to the original proposal in document GRSG/2023/16.
GRSG-125-03/Rev.1 | UN R46: Proposal supplementing document GRSG/2023/16
Proposal to add illustrations and editorial improvements to the original proposal in document GRSG/2023/16.
GRSG-125-03/Rev.1 | UN R46: Proposal supplementing document GRSG/2023/16
Proposal to add illustrations and editorial improvements to the original proposal in document GRSG/2023/16.
GRSG/2023/9 | UN R46: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to<ol><li>Establish terms and definitions to enable differentiation of "centre-steer vehicles" and "side-steer vehicles" (paragraphs 12.7. to 12.9.), and</li><li>to ensure that the indirect vision provides the driver with adequate view in both vehicle designs.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/9 | UN R46: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to<ol><li>Establish terms and definitions to enable differentiation of "centre-steer vehicles" and "side-steer vehicles" (paragraphs 12.7. to 12.9.), and</li><li>to ensure that the indirect vision provides the driver with adequate view in both vehicle designs.</li></ol>
|
GRSG-124-20/Rev.1 | UN R46: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions adapted to centre-steered vehicles of category M<sub>2,</sub> M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>3</sub>.
GRSG/2023/9 | UN R46: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to<ol><li>Establish terms and definitions to enable differentiation of "centre-steer vehicles" and "side-steer vehicles" (paragraphs 12.7. to 12.9.), and</li><li>to ensure that the indirect vision provides the driver with adequate view in both vehicle designs.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/16 | UN R46: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions for exterior rearview mirrors fixed to the protective housing.
GRSG-125-03/Rev.1 | UN R46: Proposal supplementing document GRSG/2023/16
Proposal to add illustrations and editorial improvements to the original proposal in document GRSG/2023/16.
GRSG-125-30 | UN R46: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to clarify permissibility of folding camera-monitor systems, including conditions for warnings to driver.
GRSG-125-24 | UN R46: Request for guidance on interpretation of test rig description provisions
GRSG/2023/16 | UN R46: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 05 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce provisions for exterior rearview mirrors fixed to the protective housing.
|
| 4. (b) | UN Regulation No. 158 (Reversing motion) |
GRSG might wish to resume consideration on the issue of the new UN Regulation No. [165] Reverse Warning, referring to UN Regulation No. 158 as the requirements for the pause switch. In the meantime, GRSG expects to discuss a new proposal of amendments to paragraph 16.1.3.1. of UN Regulation No. 158 revised by the IWG VRU-Proxi, if any.
GRSG-125-20 | UN R158: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to amend provisions concerning “temporarily modified view” for “automatic change of view” and deletion of related provisions under "deactivation" in order to allow systems providing enhanced visibility during manoeuvres. Additional proposal to permit temporary obstruction of view subject to conditions.
GRSG-125-20 | UN R158: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to amend provisions concerning “temporarily modified view” for “automatic change of view” and deletion of related provisions under "deactivation" in order to allow systems providing enhanced visibility during manoeuvres. Additional proposal to permit temporary obstruction of view subject to conditions.
|
GRSG-125-20 | UN R158: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to amend provisions concerning “temporarily modified view” for “automatic change of view” and deletion of related provisions under "deactivation" in order to allow systems providing enhanced visibility during manoeuvres. Additional proposal to permit temporary obstruction of view subject to conditions.
|
| 4. (c) | UN Regulation No. 159 (Moving Off Information System) |
GRSG may wish to consider proposals to amend UN Regulation No. 159, if available. |
|
| 4. (d) | UN Regulation No. [166] (Vulnerable Road Users in Front and Side Close Proximity) |
GRSG agreed to consider a proposal of amendment (supplement/new series of amendments), announced by the expert of the Russian Federation, to UN Regulation No. [166] (VRU in Front and Side Close Proximity), if available. |
|
| 4. (e) | UN Regulation No. [167] (Vulnerable Road Users Direct Vision) |
GRSG may wish to consider proposals to amend UN Regulation No. [167], if available.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
|
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
GRSG-125-22 | Status report of the VRU-Proxi informal group
GRSG/2023/10 | UN R167: Proposal for Supplement 1
Proposal from the VRU-Proxi informal group to introduce an alternative method for assessment of the frontal visible volume to address future cab designs with narrower distances between A pillars. The current measurement method is dependent on the position of the A pillar. The alternative method is independent of the cab design and would be available for use at the manufacturer's discretion.
|
| 5. | UN Regulation No. 66 (Strength of superstructure (buses)) |
GRSG may wish to resume consideration on a proposal for amendments to UN Regulation No. 66 tabled by the expert of the Russian Federation (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/2 based on GRSG-124-28) to allow additional checks in terms of passive safety at the national level.
GRSG/2023/2 | UN R66: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to allow additional checks on passive safety at the national level when conducting tests of a complete vehicle (such as checking for damage to seat mounts, objects presenting injury risks in the residual space, and operability of hatches).
GRSG/2023/2 | UN R66: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to allow additional checks on passive safety at the national level when conducting tests of a complete vehicle (such as checking for damage to seat mounts, objects presenting injury risks in the residual space, and operability of hatches).
|
GRSG-124-28 | UN R66: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to allow additional checks in terms of passive safety on the national level (for example, destruction of seats mounts, injury-causing objects entering the residual space and moving within it, operability of the emergency hatches).
GRSG/2023/2 | UN R66: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to allow additional checks on passive safety at the national level when conducting tests of a complete vehicle (such as checking for damage to seat mounts, objects presenting injury risks in the residual space, and operability of hatches).
GRSG/2023/2 | UN R66: Proposal for Supplement 1 to the 02 series of amendments
Proposal to allow additional checks on passive safety at the national level when conducting tests of a complete vehicle (such as checking for damage to seat mounts, objects presenting injury risks in the residual space, and operability of hatches).
|
| 6. | Amendments to Regulations on Gas-Fuelled Vehicles | ||
| 6. (a) | UN Regulation No. 67 (Liquefied Petroleum Gas vehicles) |
GRSG may wish to consider proposals to amend UN Regulation No. 67, if any. |
|
| 6. (b) | UN Regulation No. 110 (Compressed Natural Gas and Liquefied Natural Gas vehicles) |
GRSG agreed to keep in the agenda the proposal of Supplement 4 to the 04 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 110 (GRSG-124-32), submitted for consideration and vote at the June 2023 sessions of WP.29 and AC.1, for possible further development.
GRSG-124-32 | UN R110: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 04 Series of Amendments
Proposal e to introduce a missing transitional provision to 04 series to cover the acceptance of type approvals according to the preceding series when not affected by the provisions of the new series.
|
GRSG-124-32 | UN R110: Proposal for Supplement 4 to the 04 Series of Amendments
Proposal e to introduce a missing transitional provision to 04 series to cover the acceptance of type approvals according to the preceding series when not affected by the provisions of the new series.
|
| 7. | Amendments to the Regulations on Devices against Unauthorized Use, Immobilizers and Vehicle Alarm systems | ||
| 7. (a) | UN Regulation No. 116 (Anti-theft and alarm systems) |
GRSG may wish to consider proposals to amend UN Regulation No. 116, if any. |
|
| 7. (b) | UN Regulation No. 161 (Devices against Unauthorized Use) |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on a proposal to align the reference to UN Regulation No. 10 (Electromagnetic compatibility) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/3 based on GRSG-124-25), which resulted from the split of UN Regulation No. 116.
GRSG-124-25 | UN R161: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to update a reference to the 06 series of amendments to UN R10 on electromagnetic compatibility.
GRSG/2023/3 | UN R161: Proposal for Supplement 4
Proposal to align the reference to UN R10 (electromagnetic compatibility) resulting from the split of UN R116 into three regulations with the current series.
|
GRSG-124-25 | UN R161: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to update a reference to the 06 series of amendments to UN R10 on electromagnetic compatibility.
GRSG/2023/3 | UN R161: Proposal for Supplement 4
Proposal to align the reference to UN R10 (electromagnetic compatibility) resulting from the split of UN R116 into three regulations with the current series.
|
| 7. (c) | UN Regulation No. 162 (Immobilizers) |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on a proposal to align the reference to UN Regulation No.10 (Electromagnetic compatibility) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/4 based on GRSG-124-24).
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
GRSG/2023/4 | UN R162: Proposal for Supplement 5
Proposal to align the three UN Regulations resulting from the split of UN R116 with regard to their references to UN R10 on electromagnetic compatibility.
|
GRSG-124-24 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal to update the reference to UN R10 (electromagnetic compatibility) to the 06 series of amendments.
GRSG/2023/4 | UN R162: Proposal for Supplement 5
Proposal to align the three UN Regulations resulting from the split of UN R116 with regard to their references to UN R10 on electromagnetic compatibility.
GRSG-125-12 | UN R162: Proposal for amendments
Proposal for editorial corrections to Annexes 2a and 2b.
|
| 7. (d) | UN Regulation No. 163 (Vehicle Alarm systems) |
GRSG may wish to consider proposals to amend UN Regulation No. 163, if available. |
|
| 8. | UN Regulation No. 122 (Heating systems) |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on a proposal tabled by the expert from the Republic of Korea to allow the use of a new technology (radiation warmer) as a heating system to maximize the energy efficiency of electric vehicles (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/8 based on GRSG-124-04 and GRSG-124-05).
GRSG-124-04 | UN R122: Proposal for amendment
Proposal to introduce a new definition for "radiant warmer", to exclude such devices from the definition of "electric heater", and to add a new safety requirement that such warmers must turn off immediately if there is contact with a vehicle occupant's skin.
GRSG-125-15 | UN R122: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/8
Proposal to amend the draft text to introduce provisions for radiant warmers into the regulation.
GRSG-125-15 | UN R122: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/8
Proposal to amend the draft text to introduce provisions for radiant warmers into the regulation.
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-17 | Investigation of threshold to prevent burns from textile surface of radiant warmers
GRSG-125-17 | Investigation of threshold to prevent burns from textile surface of radiant warmers
GRSG-125-17 | Investigation of threshold to prevent burns from textile surface of radiant warmers
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
GRSG/2023/8 | UN R122: Proposal for Supplement 7
Proposal to align UN R122 to technological progress concerning the use of radiation warmers in electric vehicles. The radiation warmer is expected to increase energy efficiency of EV and is also able to prevent the sharp reduction of All Electric Range (AER).
GRSG/2023/8 | UN R122: Proposal for Supplement 7
Proposal to align UN R122 to technological progress concerning the use of radiation warmers in electric vehicles. The radiation warmer is expected to increase energy efficiency of EV and is also able to prevent the sharp reduction of All Electric Range (AER).
GRSG/2023/8 | UN R122: Proposal for Supplement 7
Proposal to align UN R122 to technological progress concerning the use of radiation warmers in electric vehicles. The radiation warmer is expected to increase energy efficiency of EV and is also able to prevent the sharp reduction of All Electric Range (AER).
|
GRSG-124-04 | UN R122: Proposal for amendment
Proposal to introduce a new definition for "radiant warmer", to exclude such devices from the definition of "electric heater", and to add a new safety requirement that such warmers must turn off immediately if there is contact with a vehicle occupant's skin.
GRSG-124-05 | Electric Radiant Warmers for Energy Saving and Improved Comfort in EVs
GRSG/2023/8 | UN R122: Proposal for Supplement 7
Proposal to align UN R122 to technological progress concerning the use of radiation warmers in electric vehicles. The radiation warmer is expected to increase energy efficiency of EV and is also able to prevent the sharp reduction of All Electric Range (AER).
GRSG-125-16 | Summary report of the technical seminar on radiant warmers
GRSG-125-15 | UN R122: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/8
Proposal to amend the draft text to introduce provisions for radiant warmers into the regulation.
GRSG-125-17 | Investigation of threshold to prevent burns from textile surface of radiant warmers
GRSG-125-33/Rev.4 | UN R122: Proposal for amendments to documents GRSG/2023/8 and GRSG-125-15
|
| 9. | UN Regulation No. 125 (Forward field of vision of drivers) |
GRSG may wish to be informed on the outcome of work of the IWG on Field of Vision Assistant (FVA) of Drivers.
GRSG-125-27/Rev.1 | Status report from the FVA informal group
GRSG-125-27/Rev.1 | Status report from the FVA informal group
GRSG-125-27/Rev.1 | Status report from the FVA informal group
GRSG-125-27/Rev.1 | Status report from the FVA informal group
GRSG-125-28 | FVA: Draft proposal for a new UN Regulation
Draft proposal from the FVA informal group for a new UN Regulation on uniform technical provisions concerning the approval of a vehicle with regard to its Field of Vision Assistant (FVA).
|
GRSG-125-27/Rev.1 | Status report from the FVA informal group
GRSG-125-28 | FVA: Draft proposal for a new UN Regulation
Draft proposal from the FVA informal group for a new UN Regulation on uniform technical provisions concerning the approval of a vehicle with regard to its Field of Vision Assistant (FVA).
GRSG-125-28 | FVA: Draft proposal for a new UN Regulation
Draft proposal from the FVA informal group for a new UN Regulation on uniform technical provisions concerning the approval of a vehicle with regard to its Field of Vision Assistant (FVA).
|
| 10. | Event Data Recorder | ||
| 10. (a) | Guidance on Event Data Recorder Performance Elements Appropriate for Adoption in the 1958 and 1998 Agreements Resolutions or Regulations |
GRSG may wish to consider a proposal to amend the guidance on Event Data Recorder (EDR) performance elements appropriate for adoption in resolutions and regulations of the 1958 and 1998 Agreements, tabled by the experts from the IWG on EDR/ Data Storage System for Automated Driving vehicles (DSSAD) to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/12).
GRSG-125-14 | China: Introduction of the EDR technology and regulations
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG/2021/32 | Guidance on EDR performance elements: Proposal for amendment
GRSG/2021/32 | Guidance on EDR performance elements: Proposal for amendment
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG may also wish to consider a proposal for guidance on heavy duty vehicles’ event data recorder performance elements appropriate for adoption in resolutions and regulations of the 1958 and 1998 Agreements (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/14).
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-08 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/14
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to amend the text of their proposal for guidelines on EDR data elements for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-14 | China: Introduction of the EDR technology and regulations
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG/2021/32 | Guidance on EDR performance elements: Proposal for amendment
GRSG/2021/32 | Guidance on EDR performance elements: Proposal for amendment
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/14 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for guidance under the 1998 Agreement
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to provide guidance on specification for EDR used in medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
|
GRSG/2023/12 | EDR guidance: Proposal for amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/14 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for guidance under the 1998 Agreement
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to provide guidance on specification for EDR used in medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG-125-08 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/14
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to amend the text of their proposal for guidelines on EDR data elements for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-14 | China: Introduction of the EDR technology and regulations
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-25 | EDR/DSSAD informal group status report to GRSG
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-122-35 | Guidance on Event Data Recorder (EDR): Proposal for amendments
Proposal by IWG EDR/DSSAD to revise document ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2021/32
GRSG/2021/32 | Guidance on EDR performance elements: Proposal for amendment
|
| 10. (b) | UN Regulation No. 160 (Event Data Recorder) |
GRSG may wish to consider a proposal to amend the provisions of UN Regulation No. 160, tabled by the experts from the of EDR/DSSAD IWG to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/11 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/15).
GRSG-125-01/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/11
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-01/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/11
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-02/Rev.2 | UN R160: Proposal for a new 02 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a new component-level verification procedure for acceleration sensor accuracy with a two-year transitional period to allow for implementation.
GRSG-125-02/Rev.2 | UN R160: Proposal for a new 02 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a new component-level verification procedure for acceleration sensor accuracy with a two-year transitional period to allow for implementation.
GRSG-125-04/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/15
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-04/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/15
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
|
GRSG/2023/11 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/15 | UN R160: Proposal for Supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments
Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to revise and clarify the acceleration data accuracy for the lateral and longitudinal acceleration data elements and introduce procedures to verify compliance of the acceleration data with the acceleration sensor accuracy specifications. The proposal is based on the following considerations:<ol><li>There are multiple ways in which the acceleration data accuracy tolerance can be applied. This can potentially lead to different interpretations when applied by type-approval authorities. For clarity, the accuracy tolerance is specified as "+/- 10 per cent of the full range of the accelerometer used in the ECU containing the EDR function".</li><li>The proposal enables a component test (including a time-shifting algorithm to address differences in sampling rates between an EDR and bench test) to address difficulties in verifying acceleration sensor accuracy under vehicle crash tests.</li><li>The proposal adds a footnote to clarify that the manufacturer has discretion (option) over the format for lateral acceleration data in rollover event because such data is not recorded using the lateral airbag deployment sensors.</li><li>The proposal adds Annex 6 on the verification procedure with an illustration of the tolerance corridor for lateral and longitudinal acceleration.</li></ol>
GRSG-125-01/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/11
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-02/Rev.2 | UN R160: Proposal for a new 02 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a new component-level verification procedure for acceleration sensor accuracy with a two-year transitional period to allow for implementation.
GRSG-125-04/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/15
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-01/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/11
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-02/Rev.2 | UN R160: Proposal for a new 02 series of amendments
Proposal to introduce a new component-level verification procedure for acceleration sensor accuracy with a two-year transitional period to allow for implementation.
GRSG-125-01/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/11
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
GRSG-125-04/Rev.1 | UN R160: Proposal for amendments to document GRSG/2023/15
Proposal to remove provisions for the verification of the acceleration data accuracy that require lead time for implementation. Specifically, lateral acceleration in rollover events are not recorded using the same sensors as used for lateral air bag deployments. A separate document proposes to include these verification procedures via a new series of amendments rather than as a supplement.
|
| 10. (c) | New UN Regulation on Event Data Recorder for Heavy Duty Vehicles |
GRSG may wish to consider a proposal of new UN Regulation on Event Data Recorder (EDR) for Heavy Duty Vehicles (HDV), tabled by the tabled by the experts from EDR/DSSAD IWG (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/13).
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-36/Rev.1 | Heavy-duty vehicle EDR: Timeline
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
|
GRSG/2023/13 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for a new UN Regulation
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to enable the type approval of medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data of their event data recorders. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG-125-26 | Statement on EDR provisions for heavy-duty vehicles
GRSG-125-36/Rev.1 | Heavy-duty vehicle EDR: Timeline
GRSG/2023/14 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for guidance under the 1998 Agreement
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to provide guidance on specification for EDR used in medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
GRSG-125-07 | Heavy vehicle EDR: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2023/13
Revisions from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to their proposal for a new UN Regulation on EDR for heavy vehicles.
GRSG/2023/14 | EDR for heavy vehicles: Proposal for guidance under the 1998 Agreement
<ol><li>Proposal from the EDR/DSSAD informal group to provide guidance on specification for EDR used in medium and heavy vehicles with regard to the minimum collection, storage, and crash survivability of crash-event data. The performance elements do not include specifications for data retrieval tools and methods which are subject to national or regional requirements.</li><li>The purpose of these performance elements is to ensure that EDR record, in a readily usable manner, data valuable for effective crash investigations and for analysis of safety equipment performance. These data elements aim to improve understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur and facilitate the development of safer vehicle designs. In this context, crashes should be understood as involving property damage and/or personal harm, including that of vulnerable road users involved in the events.</li><li>Contracting Parties may but are not required to make EDR requirements mandatory for M<sub>2</sub>, M<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>3</sub> vehicles.</li></ol>
|
| 11. | UN Regulation No. 0 (International Whole Vehicle Type Approval) |
GRSG will be informed about the outcome of the recent meetings of IWG on IWVTA and the follow-up of GRSG on the new priorities of IWVTA, Phase 2, in particular, the UN Regulations under the responsibility of GRSG that are to be added to annex 4 of UN Regulation No. 0. Moreover, GRSG agreed to resume discussion on the use of the Unique Identifier (UI) on the basis of the principle agreed by WP.29 that any prohibition of UI be clearly specified in the concerned UN Regulation.
GRSG-124-21 | DETA: Assessment of Regulations with regard to the Unique Identifier
GRSG-124-21 | DETA: Assessment of Regulations with regard to the Unique Identifier
GRSG-125-35 | 1958 Agreement - Unique Identifier Proposed actions for the IWG on DETA, GRs and WP.29
WP.29-188-20 | 1958 Agreement: Unique Identifier - Proposed actions for the DETA informal group, GR working parties, and WP.29
Note from the WP.29 secretariat
|
GRSG-124-21 | DETA: Assessment of Regulations with regard to the Unique Identifier
WP.29-188-20 | 1958 Agreement: Unique Identifier - Proposed actions for the DETA informal group, GR working parties, and WP.29
Note from the WP.29 secretariat
GRSG-125-35 | 1958 Agreement - Unique Identifier Proposed actions for the IWG on DETA, GRs and WP.29
|
| 12. | Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on a revised proposal tabled by the expert from the International Association of the Body and Trailer Building Industry (CLCCR) to amendment the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3) (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/5 based on GRSG-124-12).
GRSG-124-12 | RE3: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2022/17
Document GRSG/2022/17 addresses provisions for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars. This proposal would make editorial changes without altering the meaning of the proposed definitions.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
|
GRSG-124-12 | RE3: Proposal to amend document GRSG/2022/17
Document GRSG/2022/17 addresses provisions for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars. This proposal would make editorial changes without altering the meaning of the proposed definitions.
GRSG/2023/5 | RE3: Proposal for Amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles
Proposal to amend definitions in RE.3 taking into account new technical developments for heavy duty vehicles and battery electric cars.
|
| 13. | Special Resolution No. 1 concerning the Common Definitions of Vehicle Categories, Masses and Dimensions |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on a proposal of amendments to the Special Resolution No. 1 concerning the Common Definitions of Vehicle Categories, Masses and Dimensions (S.R.1) superseding ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2022/18, if available. |
GRSG/2022/18 | SR1: Proposal for Amendments
to amend the Special Resolution No. 1 concerning the common definitions of vehicle categories, masses and dimensions (S.R.1).
|
| 14. | Exchange of Views on Vehicle Automation |
GRSG agreed to resume consideration on the outcome of work of the Task Force on Automated Vehicles Regulatory Screening (TF AVRS) of regulations covered by GRSG and on the coordinated approach agreed by the TF Chair with the Chairs of TFs of other Working Parties.
GRSG-125-34/Rev.1 | AVRS task force: Status report to GRSG
|
GRSG-125-34/Rev.1 | AVRS task force: Status report to GRSG
GRSG-125-34/Rev.1 | AVRS task force: Status report to GRSG
|
| 15. | Other Business | ||
| 15. (a) | Exchange of Views on the Future Work of the Working Party on General Safety Provisions |
GRSG may wish review the list of priorities for the future work. |
|
| 15. (b) | Periodical Technical Inspections |
GRSG is expected to resume consideration on a revised proposal tabled by the expert from the Russian Federation proposing a New Rule (1997 Agreement), drafted by the IWG on Periodical Technical Inspections (PTI) to introduce PTI of Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS), intended to be fitted to vehicles of categories M1 and N1 covered by UN Regulation No. 144 (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2023/6 based on GRSG-124-11).
GRSG/2023/6 | AECS PTI: Proposal for a new Rule (1997 Agreement)
GRSG/2023/6 | AECS PTI: Proposal for a new Rule (1997 Agreement)
GRSG/2023/6 | AECS PTI: Proposal for a new Rule (1997 Agreement)
GRSG/2023/6 | AECS PTI: Proposal for a new Rule (1997 Agreement)
|
GRSG-124-11 | Periodical technical inspections of accident emergency call systems: Proposal for a new UN Rule
GRSG/2023/6 | AECS PTI: Proposal for a new Rule (1997 Agreement)
|
| 15. (c) | Highlights of the November 2022 and March 2023 sessions of World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations |
GRSG will be briefed by the secretariat about the highlights of the noted sessions of World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) on GRSG and other common issues.
GRSG-125-11 | GRSG: Highlights from the November 2022 and March 2023 WP.29 session
GRSG-125-11 | GRSG: Highlights from the November 2022 and March 2023 WP.29 session
GRSG-125-11 | GRSG: Highlights from the November 2022 and March 2023 WP.29 session
|
GRSG-125-11 | GRSG: Highlights from the November 2022 and March 2023 WP.29 session
|
| 15. (d) | Three-dimensional H point machine |
GRSP agreed to continue consideration on the issue of lack of harmonization of the 3D H-point machine, so as to provide support to GRSG for a common a understanding and solutions. |
|
| 15. (e) | UN Regulation No. 39 (Speedometer equipment) |
GRSG-125-05 | UN R39: Proposal for provisions on accuracy and anti-tampering for mileage and odometers
Proposal to consider exploring possibilities for ensuring reliable and robust mileage values as generated by and stored in vehicles (and/or elsewhere).
|
|
| 15. (f) | Any Other Business |
GRSG will consider any other subjects, as appropriate. |
GRSG-125-23 | Request for comments on windscreen tints
|
| 15. (g) | Agenda for the next GRSG session |
GRSG-125-37 | Provisional agenda for the 126th (October 2023) session
|