1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | WLTP: RCB correction for (N-)OVC-HEV charge sustaining test (Open issue no. 50) | ||||||||
Reference Number | WLTP-SG-EV-06-11 | ||||||||
Date |
16 Nov 2014
|
||||||||
Source(s) | ACEA | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | GTR No. 15 WLTP | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
WLTP-SG-EV | WLTP-SG-EV Session 6 | 17 Nov 2014 |
- Re-opening of the OI after request from ACEA EV group. Christoph Lueginger introduced the ACEA document on behalf of Nico Schütze (member of the ACEA WLTP EV group) and the ACEA WLTP EV group. Main issue for phase specific values. One issue that cycle energy does not take into consideration the effect from cold start only the effect from RLD. Last slide summaries the proposal. According to Japan there are two new concepts, use for CO 2 family and a warm start test to determine correction. This is an important step to reduced test burden. Japan shows test data (WLTP-SG-EV-06-14). Time consuming to determine data from test. Changing unit to Ah/km gives the same slope, almost. ACEA proposal will improve the procedure. India thinks the approach could be used. European Commission (EC) and Japan need to scrutinize the proposal to confirm at the next WLTP IWG meeting. Sub Group EV needs to prepare short introduction for next WLTP IWG meeting. Conclusion: JPN will bring this proposal and response until #9 meeting. Then, this issue could be closed in #9 meeting, after the JPN’s response. |
||||||||