1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | Sweden: Review of interim Targets and Indicators for Road Safety in 2010–2020 | ||||||||
Reference Number | LKAS-01-09 | ||||||||
Date |
20 Jan 2014
|
||||||||
Summary | Analysis based upon data from the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition System (STRADA) to inform decision-making on future road safety targets and performance indicators. | ||||||||
Source(s) | STA | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | ELKS and UN R79 Steering Equipment | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
LKAS | Session 1 | 19-20 Nov 2013 |
Sweden was keen to introduce their vision. The Chair, as representative of Sweden, introduced LKAS-01-09, made by the
OICA found a conflict with the LDWS EU commitment. The delegate from S clarified that the document was tabled to explain the commitment of Sweden in the ad hoc group. The delegate stress that the authorities usually rely very much on the good functionning of fthe driver assistance systems, which explains the need for a certain level of performance. The expert from OICA pointed out that passenger cars are not driven by trained professionals, rather by usual customers (e.g. rental cars). The experts were informed that in addition, Sweden believes the LKAS to be a corner stone toward autonomous driving (in Sweden, by 2016). OICA stressed that current LKAS are used only above a certain speed, in straight roads, etc. the experts questionned whether S has the objective of making the system work in all conditions. It was stressed by OICA that there are two kinds of systems currently on the market, comfort systems and safety systems. The expert wondered whether excluding low cost vehicles because the system may be too expensive for them. J was ready to discuss this item, relating to the content of the requirements. |
||||||||