Working draft of the updated version of UN Regulation No. 94 on frontal impacts
Document FI-21-06
11 June 2013
Status: Superseded
Download document
Previous Documents, Discussions, and Outcomes
14. | Regulation No. 94 (Frontal collision)

23. The expert from France, Chair of the IWG on frontal impact, introduced the status report of the group (GRSP-54-40). He informed GRSP that the IWG was ready to submit a proposal for the May 2014 session of GRSP and introduced a first draft for information only (GRSP-54-27). He clarified that the amendment would introduce: (i) a full-width frontal crash test against a rigid barrier at 50 km/h, (ii) a new biomechanical criteria for elderly people (65 years and older) and (iii) the 5th percentile female dummy. The expert from Japan made a presentation (GRSP-54-25) to show the influence of the diagonal safety-belt path to chest deflection and announced a proposal to address this issue in the framework of activities of the IWG. The expert from France confirmed the importance of the belt position for the thorax deflection and clarified that the current proposal of the IWG addressed both sexes, as well as covering the safety of younger occupants. Finally, GRSP unanimously agreed to resume consideration on this agenda item at its May 2014 session on the basis of a concrete proposal for a new UN Regulation instead of an amendment to UN Regulation No. 94, drafted by the IWG.

3.3.1. | 53rd GRSP; Frontal Impact Status Report

See document GRSP-53-25 and GRSP-53-26 (status report and first draft for amended ECE 94).
Timeline: the draft has to be sent to GRSP on September 20th 2013 (in order to be a working document).
Target: Amended text to be adopted in May 2014 GRSP.
Impact assessment group: results to be available by end of 2013.

3.3.6. | Proposition of ECE R94 text amendment
14. | Regulation No. 94 (Frontal collision)

34. [The expert from France] concluded by introducing for information only, a draft proposal (GRSP-53-26), that would be submitted as an official document for the December 2013 session of GRSP. The experts from Japan introduced GRSP-53-20, supporting the configuration of the test proposed by the IWG. However, he argued that there are no evidence showing difference in the age and gender ratio of occupants due to the difference of crash configuration between the FWRB and offset deformable barrier (ODB) tests. The expert from Germany raised similar concerns. GRSP agreed, to resume discussion on this agenda item at its December 2013 session, based on an official proposal submitted by the IWG incorporating the comments received and further outcomes of the IWG.

Related and Previous Documents
GRSP-53-26
GRSP-54-27
Relates to UN R94 |