GAR | FI-21-04

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 131 \| Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Document:	Revision 1 \| Amendment 3
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 24 Sep 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2023/11 Proposal to increase the potential speed reduction during the collision warning phase and clarify the interpretation of “engine start/run cycle”.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 131 \| Advanced Emergency Braking Systems
Document:	Revision 2 \| Amendment 1
Corresponds to:	02 series of amendments \| Supplement 1 (Entered into force on 24 Sep 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2023/12 Proposal to align provisions with corresponding provisions of UN R152 and to clarify the interpretation of the provisions on system robustness when applied to heavy duty vehicles.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 137 \| Restraint System in Frontal Impact
Document:	Revision 2
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 1 (Entered into force on 29 Dec 2018)
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 2 (Entered into force on 28 May 2019)
Corresponds to:	01 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 3 Jan 2021)
Corresponds to:	02 series of amendments (Entered into force on 9 Jun 2021)

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 161 \| Devices for Protection against Unauthorized Use
Document:	Revision 0 \| Amendment 3
Corresponds to:	00 series of amendments \| Supplement 3 (Entered into force on 5 Jun 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2022/146 Proposal from GRSG to clarify the scope of the UN Regulation and to complement the text with the missing Supplement 7 to the original version of UN R116.

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 13 \| Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Document:	Revision 9 \| Amendment 2
Corresponds to:	12 series of amendments \| Supplement 2 (Entered into force on 5 Jun 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2022/138

Regulation:	UN Regulation No. 13 \| Heavy-Duty Vehicle Braking
Document:	Revision 8 \| Amendment 11
Corresponds to:	11 series of amendments \| Supplement 20 (Entered into force on 5 Jun 2023)
Based on:	Document WP.29/2022/137 Proposal to clarify provisions regarding the actuation of the parking brake warning device to cover the case of electric control transmission systems where there may be a transition between parked (applied) and un-parked (released) braking states.

Proposals for changes to the ECE-R 94: Dummy position, seat position, and injury risk values

Document FI-21-04

11 June 2013

21st FI session (11 Jun 2013)

Submitted by BASt

21st FI session (11 Jun 2013)

3.3.2. | Test Set Configuration - Barrier, Dummy, Criteria Limits

THIRD BAST PRESENTATION (FI-21-04): Proposal for Changes to the ECE-R 94 to address acceleration induced injuries – Dummy position – Seat position – Injury risk values

CLEPA (C.Sunnevang, Autoliv) comments that the wording used in the presentation could be clarified: acceleration induced means the pulse (acceleration of the car), and not any acceleration on the dummy.

- Discussion on the dummy age and dummy size:

Pierre Castaing recalls that if only the elderly age for the whole scenario is chosen, then car manufacturers would be pushed towards a softer restraint system. The situation of a 35yo male at higher speed (more energy) should also be taken into account. Regulation 94 aims at covering the whole population. As an example in helmets regulation, the compromise chosen for a low pulse (low acceleration) is not necessarily optimized for a higher acceleration.

Regarding the legs of the 5th dummy, OICA (A.Pott) underlines that there is no calibration procedure because they are not used in the US FMVSS 208. If the proposal is to have a 5th in the intrusion test (ODB), the group has to keep in mind that there might be some question marks with the calibration, and repeatability of this leg.
Furthermore, the dummies placements were deeply discussed one year ago. The group had in mind to cover most of our customers. Therefore it was decided not to change the intrusion test (ODB) and therefore to keep both driver and passenger 50th dummies. OICA strongly proposes again not to change the dummies in the ODB test.
OICA (I.Dausse) adds that any change in the ODB protocol would go against harmonization (China, Brazil…).

Pierre Castaing states that going to an extremely low chest deflection with HIII rodpot would go to the limit of confidence of measurement of the rodpot system, and could lead to less coverage of the real world. He recalls that the group already decided to keep the chest deflection criteria for 5th HIII dummy at 45yo:
chest deflexion: 34mm corresponding to 50% risk, 5th, 65
chest deflexion: 45mm corresponding to 50% risk, 5th, 45
An alternative could be to keep the 45mm for the 5th dummy, and stating that it is for 65yo with higher than 50% risk.

Reference Number:	TA-23-07
Meeting Session(s):	23rd TA session (25 Apr)
Document date:	29 May 24

Reference Number:	AVC-05-01
Meeting Session(s):	5th AVC session (15 May)
Document date:	13 May 24
Regarding:	AV categories

Reference Number:	AVC-04-07
Meeting Session(s):	4th AVC session (30 Apr)
Document date:	13 May 24
Regarding:	AV categories

Reference Number:	R134-24-04/Rev.1
Submitted by:	OICA
Meeting Session(s):	24th R134 session (7 May)
Document date:	09 May 24
Regarding:	UN R134 Hydrogen Fuel Cell Safety

How Do You Want Call Up the List of Documents?

AC.3 Select Year

GRB Select Year

GRBP Select Year

GRE Select Year

GRPE Select Year

GRRF Select Year

GRSG Select Year

GRSP Select Year

GRVA Select Year

WP.29 Select Year

Documents concerning UN R94 Frontal Collision Protection

AC.3

Select Year

GRB

Select Year

GRBP

Select Year

GRE

Select Year

GRPE

Select Year

GRRF

Select Year

GRSG

Select Year

GRSP

Select Year

GRVA

Select Year

WP.29

Select Year