| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Concerns over the current draft of the retrofit emissions control (REC) devices regulation | ||||||||
| Reference Number | REC-14-10 | ||||||||
| Date |
19 Feb 2013
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | EIC-UK | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R132 Retrofit Emissions | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .docx format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| REC | Session 14 | 19-20 Feb 2013 |
Galey presented document REC-14-10. He said the same system showed 85% NOx conversion on the London bus cycle but only 47% on the WHTC. Himmen added that the conversion is determined by the moment when urea can be injected. May noted that this was on the cold-WHTC and asked what the conversion would be on the weighted WHTC. Galey said it would be near 60%. His concern is that BAT would not be able to meet the 60% NOx conversion. Baarbé suggested not reopening the discussion on the 60% figure. At the side of this discussion, Martinez asked to get clarification from the UNECE secretariat on the applicability of the REC regulation in the CPs. |
||||||||