| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document title | Concerns over the current draft of the retrofit emissions control (REC) devices regulation | ||||||||||
| Date | 17 Feb 2013 | ||||||||||
| Source(s) | EIC-UK | ||||||||||
| Status | |||||||||||
| Rulemaking area(s) | |||||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||||
| Related documents | |||||||||||
| Downloads: | .docx format | ||||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||||
| REC | Session 14 | 19-20 Feb 2013 |
Galey presented document REC-14-10. He said the same system showed 85% NOx conversion on the London bus cycle but only 47% on the WHTC. Himmen added that the conversion is determined by the moment when urea can be injected. May noted that this was on the cold-WHTC and asked what the conversion would be on the weighted WHTC. Galey said it would be near 60%. His concern is that BAT would not be able to meet the 60% NOx conversion. Baarbé suggested not reopening the discussion on the 60% figure. At the side of this discussion, Martinez asked to get clarification from the UNECE secretariat on the applicability of the REC regulation in the CPs. |
||||||||||