1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Document Title | NSG Group comments on the results of the taber round robin tests | ||||||||
Reference Number | IGPG-02-07 | ||||||||
Date |
29 Jun 2011
|
||||||||
Source(s) | NSG | ||||||||
Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R43 Safety Glazing | ||||||||
Meeting(s) | |||||||||
Downloads | |||||||||
UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
IGPG | Session 2 | 14-15 Jun 2011 |
The expert from NSG Group presented the document IGPG-02-07. The group in general was of the opinion that other test procedures should be investigated additional to the Taber test. It was also decided to watch the results of the ISO working group. Bayer presented the results of their investigation about the possible relevant abrasion tests (document IGPG-02-05). The Technical Services confirmed it is possible to perform some of the proposed test methods. An additional option was proposed as keeping the Taber test, and adding another relevant one for the plastic glazing. Some ideas were proposed to combine a less severe Taber test (500 cycles) with e.g. car wash test. The Chair recalled in this view document IGPG-01-06 where J proposed some successive tests on the same sample. The Secretary informed that UNECE regulations are always possible to amend and improve if the necessity appears. OPEL supported this statement and suggested adding the Taber test at a later stage. The Chair suggested having a closer look to the sand drop test and the Amtec-Kistler test and the proposal raised to organise two round robin tests for those tests: Sand drop test
Car wash (Amtec-Kistler)
Conclusion:
|
||||||||