| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document Title | Tables of Taber test results: Revised | ||||||||
| Reference Number | IGPG-02-03/Rev.1 | ||||||||
| Date |
29 Jun 2011
|
||||||||
| Source(s) | Taber | ||||||||
| Rulemaking Area(s) | UN R43 Safety Glazing | ||||||||
| Meeting(s) | |||||||||
| Downloads | |||||||||
| UNECE server | .pdf format | ||||||||
| Excerpts from session reports related to this document | |||||||||
| IGPG | Session 2 | 14-15 Jun 2011 |
Dr. Buckel presented in detail document IGPG-02-02-Rev.1 as a completed version of the document IGPG-02-02 providing the results of the Taber Round Robin test. Mr Terragni (Sabic) firstly informed that the timing was not the reason why his company did not provide samples, rather a company decision (reference to the statement in 3rd paragraph of page 2 of document IGPG-02-02). J provided information about their wheels (CS-10F for generations 1 to 4; Daiwa C180 0FX) and comparison test. The delegate from J informed that these results were presented the week before at the ISO group in Detroit. The generation N°1 CS-10F wheel (expired in 2002) produced similar results according to the time compared to the Daiwa C180 0FX. The experts were also informed about the ISO Round robin test currently conducted and addressing Daiwa wheels for plastics and glass. It was suggested that the IGPG refers to ISO, but the experts acknowledged that the timeframe does not permit to do this. ISO will probably compare the wheels from Daiwa and Taber. |
||||||||