GTR 3: Proposal for an amendment
Download in .pdf format Download in .docx format

Proposal to align GTR No. 3 with technical progress, addressing among others: electromagnetic compatibility/immunity of ABS-systems, ABS performance requirements for category 3-5 vehicles (three-wheelers), uniform requirements for equipment such Emergency Stop Signal and the means to disable the ABS, if equipped. This amendment aims to harmonize GTR with recent amendments made to UN Regulation No. 78 while addressing its use under self-certification compliance systems.

Reference Number: GRVA/2018/9
Origin: Italy
Date: 17 July 2018
Proposal Status: Superseded
Related Documents:
GRRF-86-10 | GTR 3: Revised proposal for Amendment 3
GRRF/2017/15 | Proposal to amend Global Technical Regulation No. 3
GRVA-02-07 | GTR 3: Proposal for amendments to GRVA/2018/9
GRVA/2019/23 | GTR 3: Proposal for an amendment
Discussion(s):
Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 1 | 25-28 Sep 2018

50. GRVA agreed with the suggestion of expert from Italy to postpone the consideration of this item until the January 2019 session.

54. The expert from Italy introduced GRVA-02-07 proposing amendments to the original proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9) for amendments to UN GTR No. 3 for harmonization of the GTR and UN Regulation No. 78. The proposal received some comments. The expert from the Netherlands asked why the proposal contained technical requirements that differed from those in UN Regulation No. 78. The expert from Canada highlighted some formulations that could be better defined to facilitate the implementation of the UN GTR into Self Certification regulations.

Working Party on Automated and Connected Vehicles | Session 2 | 28 Jan-1 Feb 2019

50. GRVA agreed with the suggestion of expert from Italy to postpone the consideration of this item until the January 2019 session.

54. The expert from Italy introduced GRVA-02-07 proposing amendments to the original proposal (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9) for amendments to UN GTR No. 3 for harmonization of the GTR and UN Regulation No. 78. The proposal received some comments. The expert from the Netherlands asked why the proposal contained technical requirements that differed from those in UN Regulation No. 78. The expert from Canada highlighted some formulations that could be better defined to facilitate the implementation of the UN GTR into Self Certification regulations.